Understanding the Three Languages of Politics

Posted by Solver 9 years, 9 months ago to Politics
2 comments | Share | Flag

I highly recommend this Podcast for helping individuals learn how to more successfully communicate to those with conflicting political views.

From: "Philosophy in Action Radio"

"How many times have you been in political discussions with friends where you find you’re talking past one another? You’ll make points they consider irrelevant, whereas they’ll focus on issues you consider nonessential. Such problems can be overcome, at least in part, using Arnold Kling’s concept of the “Three Languages of Politics.” Paul Hsieh will explain how freedom advocates (e.g., Objectivists and better libertarians), conservatives, and liberals tend to use three vastly different metaphors in political discussions, which can create unintentional misunderstandings and miscommunications. He will also discuss how to frame discussion points so they better resonate with those speaking the other “languages” without compromising on principles."

"About the “three languages of politics”
The differences in the three languages
The difference that the three languages make
Examples of the three languages
Conflict between camps
Alliances between camps
Political argument between camps
The debates over the Hobby Lobby decision
Using the three languages to become more persuasive
Caveats and cautions
Three take-home points"

http://www.philosophyinaction.com/blog/?...
SOURCE URL: http://www.philosophyinaction.com/blog/?p=13900


Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by CircuitGuy 9 years, 9 months ago
    I d/l'ed it. What does it say about those points?
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by 9 years, 9 months ago
      "...political discourse tends to run along three axes…Liberals tend to judge along an oppressor-oppressed axis, Conservatives along a barbarian-civilization axis, Libertarians along a coercion-freedom axis. The purpose of the book is not to deconstruct and criticize what [the author] sees as the dominant heuristics of each group, but to use them to help readers get into their ideological opposition’s shoes."
      - section from an Amazon reviewer

      The Podcast discusses many of the points in the book:
      http://www.amazon.com/Three-Languages-Po...
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo