First we would have to allow the States in the USA
(aka USSA, United Socialist States of America) to secede. (Last time a secession here happened, the North hammered the South.)

Then we can see what would happen, if for instance, California invaded New Mexico.
..or if liberal Coastal CA invaded N.CA united with Northern NV, UT, WY, ND, SD, and Idaho.

You'll get no argument from old dino over that.

Bingo Doc! Too bad I fear there are way too many sheeple wanting to have a feel good moment when they know the one who promised free everything gets the throne, and then "ooops" never delivers. They had it with the Obamanation, and they will have it with The Beast, as long as she lasts, then, I believe, they will have it with Emperor Kaine. There is way too much clear cut corruption that no one cares about going on, I think there are very powerful forces at work here, with lots and lots of money and power pushing it's own agenda. I could be wrong, it could just be that they have grown so arrogant, and feel they own enough of the system, for anyone to stop them now.

Let's see: peaceful relations with the second most powerful nuclear power on the planet, or a possible nuclear exchange thanks to an idiot with a bad foreign relations track record. Seems like an easy choice for me.

Doc, I am afraid that we have known that our government is totally corrupt for a while now, ARE knew it when she wrote AS. The vast majority of America actually believes the crap they feed us, so we are still a small minority. The only hopeful sign is it is all out in the open now. All they have to do is complete the revelation and declare the Republicrat part corrupt for us to be able to start talking a whole sale overhaul. The Convention of States is gathering steam....

Yes, once you read it really closely it does have a spark of humor...and will easily get her another 100K votes.

Excellent point, and very believable.

he doesn't respect the Obamanation either, look at how hey have handled Syria. Total ineptitude for 8 years, and we are in greater danger now than then. Yep we need 8 more years of "progress" down the toilet hole.

Besides, there is no factual connection, that is a Dumbocrapic propaganda line. There is no objective proof that there is a connection. You can say "A vote for HillaryBeast is a vote for illegal voting" and be more accurate.

Uh, because the price of failure is too high, The Beast should not be president if at all preventable, which is highly doubtful...

I have been down that rabbit hole this year, too, Nick. Its good to have friends who got a good night's sleep who haul me back out ;^)

Ukraine would have been fine if the U.S. Presidents (Clinton, Bush) hadn't interfered in the Ukraine-Russia relations. Both Clinton and Bush stated their desire to bring Ukraine into NATO, which could have meant the loss of Black Sea ports in Crimea for Russia. When the elected leader of Ukraine came out against joining the EU (maybe he was prescient as to what a crap organization that has become?), preferring stronger economic connections to Russia, we helped engineer a coup that placed an anti-Russian government in charge.

There are always two sides to every story, and we seem to have a talent for feeding Russian paranoia. The one Mediterranean port available to the Russian navy is Latakia, Syria, so our constantly trying to engineer the overthrow of Bashar Assad hasn't set well with the Russians either.

"It is not a news report." Yep, picked up on that as soon as it put Putin in Tampa. Bad satire, but it is a great piece of propaganda propagating the Hildebeast lie trying to connect Trump and Putin.

It reminds me of when I hear liberals falsely quoting Sarah Palin when they say "I can see Russia from my house!", which was actually said by Tina Fey on SNL mocking Palin.

Don't forget a very large part of geographic Ukraine, especially the Eastern half, is populated with Russians who are very pro Putin. Therefore, when you say "Ukraine's perspective" it also includes the perspective of the country's Russian people.

There's far more involved in the Ukraine situation and it isn't as simple as a Putin land grab, IMHO.

Why not see things from Ukraine's perspective! Lets see what would happen if someone invaded America!

A vote for Trump is a vote for Putin, I know you guys don't have much choice, Why not write your own candidates name on the ballot paper, So John Gault for president?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iD9RX...

Putin knows Hillary is a loose canon, and he cares about his country. He has to know about her brain damage and her erratic behavior, even if our stupid voting public does not. As a leader, communision aside, I respect Puting about 10 times more than Hillary. She is nothing more than a big mouth cackling broad, with a foul mouth and little else to fall back on. She is not as smart as the con man Bill. She lies, braks laws, and sets peopel against people to get what she wants. Putin knows Trump will function as a measured businessman, but he won't get the chance.

If you have two powerful countries and one has a strong leader and the other a wuss, there can only be disaster for the wuss' side. On the other hand, if you have two strong leaders with the sense to know how far you can go, then you usually end up with a compromise that both can live with. Putin will respect strength. He will not respect Madam Secretary. He has already shown that with previous dealings with her. (Do I see a reset button?) Please vote Trump on Tuesday. Thank you.

Putin looked out at the audience and said "I can see Sarah Palin from here".

Satire aside, it's time we made the attempt to see things from Russia's perspective. A large, underpopulated country with no natural barriers to invasion, it has a bit of paranoia resulting from suffering numerous invasions. Bill Clinton, in a bonehead move, pushed NATO right in Russia's face as their military was in a state of collapse. That, more than anything else, made Vladimir Putin a desirable figure to the Russian people.

Is Russia a kleptocracy? Unquestionably, but thanks to Wikileaks, we're quickly discovering our government power elite are at least as corrupt.

Hillary's attempt to recreate the Cold War would be a disaster, possibly leading to a dangerous potentially nuclear conflict.

Along with Putin there is a reanimated Ronald Reagan set to appear at the last moment. Actually there's not too much animation and his mouth moves with strings. Fortunately there are many recorded speeches and quips to use.

I to am fine with Trump and Putin talking. Every time I see Clinton's lips move I already know she is lying. Just now I heard her say she loves this country. No Shit, she has sold half of it!

Putin doesnt want war with the USA, and we dont want war with Russia. Whats wrong with at least talking openly instead of the "hidden nonsense" that Hillary's secretary of state engaged in.

If Putin and Trump can talk, whats wrong with that? Reagan and Gorbachev talked and that worked out. All the while Reagan was building up our military, which is what Trump would do too.

Hillary will get us into situations where war is the only answer she will see. She will back into them through stupidity.
Just take her no-fly zones in syria. We demand no russian planes fly there, they ignore her demand, and we are forced to shoot one down. NOW ww3 could easily erupt from that.

Imagine if Hillary would have been president during the 'cuban missile crisis"- she would have waited until the missiles were actually operational while she was "talking", and then she would have had a war on her hands.

Such a Stupid woman should never be president