About Evan McMullin
An interesting guy here, seems to have a lot of positions that resonate with people in the Gulch, especially around government and politics. Joined the party a little late, but may be worth looking at. Seems a mix of Libertarian and old Republicrat.
Previous comments... You are currently on page 6.
A welcome change for 4 years. We have tried the establishment and there is no reason to think that following its rules will suddenly produce better results than it has in the past.
Trump is not a libertarian by any stretch, but he can help remake the system so perhaps a libertarian has a chance in the future. Hillary will cement the control of the establishment with her cronyism, and it will be harder for third parties in the future. Look at what she did to Bernie Sanders this time (and the idiot is campaigning for her now !!! Did he get bought off too?)
I don't agree with McMullin on all his policies, but I would take a Mormon at their word over many others - and most especially the two major candidates. I don't think he has a realistic prayer of winning - even in Utah - but I'd vote for him before I'd vote for either Trump or Hillary.
"Best indicator of future behavior is past behavior," Henry Bowman
I dont like that part, which is why I am inclined to call it a cult. There are documentaries that show how it IS a cult, but I havent been close enough to personally see that.
This said, their fiscal ideas are quite good, as are the family values they espouse. I just wouldnt want one to be president and be in a position to push their religious beliefs off on me or use their power to enforce them.
Plus the fact that it is a "religion" based on fixed ideas sent down from some prophet and enforced by the grand dragon in salt lake city.
I am very tolerant of other religions like mormonism, and I wish THEY were as tolerant of my views on life. I can be friends with mormons, but I would have to realize that whatever their religion told them to do, thats what they would do regardless of rationality
They are not a "cult". They are the fastest-growing philosophical/religious movement in the world and they have congregations in nearly every nation. If you look up any worldwide catastrophe, you will see their people there on the ground helping out and distributing aid - under the radar. One of their "grand dragons" as you want to call him, Ezra Taft Benson, actually headed the Department of Agriculture under Dwight Eisenhower. Want to know what he was against? Farm subsidies. And he grew up a farmer! Want to know why he was against subsidies? Because he opposed the idea of government welfare and felt like everyone should work to support their own. What a novel concept, eh?
I know a few Mormons and they are some of the nicest people you will ever meet, and some of the best patriots as well. They certainly have their kooks like Harry Reid as well, so there is a grain of salt. You may not know this, but the Bundy family, Finicum families and Hammond families are all Mormons.
I've never had an affair, groped women, run in corrupt political circles or abandoned dates to drown in my car. I, also, know virtually nothing about politics, but carry a copy of the Constitution with me, daily. These facts, alone, probably make me more qualified than either of the top two candidates for President.
I would never want a cult to run our government. Neither would most people. And I dont want some crooked woman running our government either.
That leaves Johnson (who cant possibly win), and Trump (who might if the trump haters get a life and realize the alternative is crooked hillary this time, period.)
Guess he could get the NSA employee vote.
Johnson's actions as governor and even his resposes after stumbling on air in his campaign indicate an ethical person. I don't agree with some of his propsals, but I do agree with the most important ones and I think those could make the others a non issue in reality. I think it is much more likely that Johnson can learn presentation skills than for Trump (or Hitlery) to suddenly become ethical, or for McMullin to suddenly want to restrict government power when his entire adult life experience is working to expand government.
Based on McMullin's actions and experience:
(1) CIA operative -BIG NEGATIVE
(2) Goldman Sachs operative - BIG NEGATIVE
(3) GOP Committee on Foreign Relations operative - BIG NEGATIVE
McMullin has been working for the enemy his entire life. No chance I trust that he is telling the truth as a candidate.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/gary-johns...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evan_Mc...
McMullin is polling high in Utah, where he was born, and could carry the state. If he does, then since Utah has 6 electoral votes and New Mexico has only 5, Gary Johnson would have to carry more than his home state to place third in nationwide electoral votes and be considered for President by the House of Representatives.