In a U.S. presidential election, who would vote for someone who opted for an email account with the self-titled account name, "swastika_armband@-----.com"? Obviously a swastika armband fascination or fetish doesn't make one a Nazi, but it at least distinctly indicates a fascination with the trappings of Nazism. Among the email account addresses maintained by Ms. Clinton, on her private server, was the account titled, "mau_suit@clintonemail.com." (See URL.)

Although there could be a sloppy spelling issue in the self-selected account title "mau_suit," the likelihood of Ms. Clinton harboring a fascination, if not a fetish, with the absolutist, autocratic style of Communist Mao Tse-Dong can't be dismissed--although it has clearly been overlooked or dismissed by all major media sources.

So, who will Americans determine is the more insidious threat to their Constitution and way of life: an intellectually clumsy Archie Bunker with enhanced promotional/organizational skills, or someone who craves the universal adulation and absolute power inherent in a "Mau" suit?