Libyans suing Goldman Sachs - and what it means

Posted by $ blarman 7 years, 11 months ago to News
13 comments | Share | Flag

It's actually a very thoroughly-researched article from a normally left-wing source, but what struck me was the following legal analysis:

"A bedrock principle of the securities business is that sophisticated investors can look out for themselves and don’t have recourse to the courts if they lose their shirts. If a huge sovereign wealth fund can successfully claim it was duped, there’s no telling who else can."

What this means in layman's terms is that if Libya's suit is successful, any investor can similarly sue any of these investment bankers.

Interesting.


All Comments

  • Posted by $ jdg 7 years, 11 months ago
    The swindles that hurt the most people and collect the most money are those carried out by politicians on the floor of Congress. Unfortunately we can't sue Barney Frank for his "Fannie and Freddie are sound!" speech, or Jerry Brown for touting the great promises of California's so-called high speed rail project. It would take constitutional change to give us that ability, but I want to see it happen.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by chad 7 years, 11 months ago
    They are all (Federal Reserve, investment banks, member banks) peddling fiat currency which is immoral and destructive of any economy. The participants know it and hope to profit enough to ride out the destruction of inflation and live well. The fact that it is destructive of all those who have limited earning power, savers and the elderly who have been reduced in earning power is irrelevant to them. If you did destroy Goldman Sachs the Federal Reserve would print more currency and give it to them through another TARP program destroying the poor even more.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Blanco 7 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I don't agree with that sentiment. As an emotion, hope often enables us to continue the fight when all seems lost. All humans need hope. Of course, we must also couple hope with positive, moral action.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Blanco 7 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I don't agree with that sentiment. As an emotion, hope often enables us to continue the fight when all seems lost. All humans need hope. Of course, we must also couple hope with positive, moral action.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by cjmcd 7 years, 11 months ago
    I hope these sleazes at goldman get nailed good.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Herb7734 7 years, 11 months ago
    Libya is a quagmire worse than the LaBrea Tar Pits.
    Sitting on untold wealth, it took what could have been a paradise into a hell-hole. Look at Israel. Sitting atop the Negev desert it produces everything from vegetables and fruit to electronics and medicine. Can you imagine what they could have done if they sat on a pool of oil?
    Joke:
    Moses meets Jesus in heaven. Moses says, "Jesus, you never speak to me or invite me to dinner. How come? Jesus replies, "because you're a fool." Moses, aghast, "why do you call me a fool?" "Because," says Jesus, "if you had only made a left turn instead of a right turn when you were wandering in the desert, we'd all have been billionaires."
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by wiggys 7 years, 11 months ago
    It means that Libya is broke and wants to confiscate money from a bank. the us government is a good example for them to follow.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by freedomforall 7 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Granted, but US investors would have to sue in US courts. The banksters are well protected from "any" US investor. The banksters paid token fines to the feds for their unethical acts, were bailed out using taxpayers money (and are still being bailed out with the fed manipulating share prices), and the investors are screwed, as they have been since 1913, and will be as long as the DemReps are spineless cowardly looting traitors.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Olduglycarl 7 years, 11 months ago
    I would think that it would eventually mean We the People could sue them for crashing our economies.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 7 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    The suit isn't going forward in the US, but rather in London. That's one of the reasons it is interesting.

    The other is the argument they are making: that they were duped into the contract because of the position of the salesperson. They are claiming that ignorance of the contract's ramifications invalidate the contract as a whole and entitle them to reparations.
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo