Did you answer ALL the questions? There are more than twice as many to answer if you click on "answer more questions" at the end of each section. Did you carefully gauge and mark the importance for each question? Did you look at all the other choices in addition to "Yes" or "No"?
Edit to add the following----------------------
I took it twice and only varied the importance of the questions from all medium to my actual position, and it made an amazing difference.
Johnson dropped from 88% to 70% (1st choice both ways)
Trump dropped from 80%(2nd) to 40%(3rd).
Castle jumped up from 45%(4th) to 66% (2nd)
McMullin dropped from 55%(3rd) to 36%(4th)
Stein dropped from 32% to 17%
Hitlery dropped from 13% to 4%
End edit ------------------------------

It is better than most "tests" for political views, although quite a few questions were worded poorly enough that I had to type my own answer. My guess is that those answers are not included in the comparison to candidates. There is no way to gauge how the test graded the candidates either, but I'd guess it is based solely on their current tale ignoring their actions in the past. That makes the test a poor tool for choosing a candidate since it must ignore whether the candidate's answers are truthful based on their actions.
For me, Johnson was easily top choice even though I disagree with him on immigration and association issues. Hitlery was dead last with Stein slightly above her but far behind all other candidates. Guess that makes me a sexist in their irrational minds.

This site is a good opportunity to see what the candidates say they will do specifically issue by issue.
They will never cover this in detail in the debates.
From his answers here (if you believe Trump was truthful), imo, Trump is a big government fascist, like Hitlery in respect to many foreign policy issues.
Examination of Hitlery's responses shows she continues to lie about her goals, actions, and motivations.

That was fun! I was surprised after answering and rating all of the questions, I came out 99% Trump. Big surprise, only 3% Hillary, no surprise. Wouldn't be cool to give that same test to some inner city people, an see if they really are Hillary supporters?

I came out pretty close to what I thought I would. A fun survey, but not worth wasting a lot of time with.

I am most aligned with Darrell Castle and the Constitution Party. Not surprising to me. Donald Trump was 2nd.

I turn out to agree, for the most part, with Evan McMullin, who doesn't stand a snowball's chance in the crater of Mount Etna to win, and second to him with Donald J. Trump, whose chances of winning are now at least even, if he is not in fact the odds-on favorite! Darrell Castle and Gary Johnson come in next. Hillary Clinton and Jill Stein come in dead last--single digits.

The additional information shown below the candidate ratings are also very interesting.
A. It places your views on a political scale of right-left, liberty vs authoritarian.
B. Rates your views on political themes: privacy vs security, assimilation vs multicultural, Regulation vs Deregulation, Collectivism vs Individualism, Centralization vs Decentralization, Small Government vs Big Government, Traditional vs Progressive
C. Shows Map of the US with color coded voter "agreement" with your answers
Very interesting!
Also shows how voters rank the candidates for the voters' most important qualifications:
Integrity- Johnson highest rated
Honesty- Johnson highest rated
Intelligence- Johnson highest rated
Leadership- Johnson highest rated
Vision- Johnson highest rated
Committment- Johnson highest rated
Consistency- Johnson highest rated
Communication - Stein highest rated

Lots of other qualifications of lower importance to voters also listed.

Results from my choices are here:
http://www.isidewith.com/elections/20...

85% Trump (I don't even like him) and the Independent, what's-his-name.

Clinton and Stein barely even registered.

Fun test, though!

I took the test with the extended questions and the results are in!!
Donald Trump 95%
Gary Johnson 49%
Parkinson's Clinton 6%
Jill Stein 4%

Full disclosure: I am a Constitutional Conservative with a Degree in Constitutional Law
and I have taught U.S. History and Computer Science.

I also disabled tracking [as always] to keep my privacy.

I hope the results on November 8th are relatively the same.

Somewhat comforting to learn that since I started smoking at a young age and finally managed to quit four years ago.
I'm kinda like an alcoholic on the wagon. I can't smoke anything without getting hooked. No celebratory someone had a baby cigars for me!
My nonsmoking parents often entertained a couple who seemed to smoke nonstop. Both died of emphysema.

Gary Johnson 94%. Seems accurate enough.

No surprise here. 96% with The Donald. 2% with Hillary

Hillary 4% -- We agree the TPP has too many hidden provisions.

Johnson 60%
Castle 48%
McMullen 42%
Trump 39%
Stein 9%

'Libertarian 78%' I seem to have dropped vertically on "The World's shortest Political Quiz" towards the Center-Right.

I attribute that to my growing disdain for the suicidal insanity of 'Pure Libertarians'. Earlier this year I became aware that I was always a 'Paleo-Libertarian' -- which I suspect is also true for MOST Gulchers!

I do follow things pretty closely. But, who is Mcmullin. Guess I could have just looked him up. How many of y'all really know who he is? No BS.

My top two were Trump and McMullin at around 90% each. I've never even heard of McMullin! Trump isn't my favorite candidate, but he's the only one that has any chance of upsetting wicked Hillary. So, he's got my vote - especially as a gun owner and avid shooter. Politics is mostly about choosing the lesser evil anyway, at least it is for me.

Thats a pretty good site. I didnt even know there was a constitutional party, but I came out preferring it's candidate. Next was Trump, then Johnson.

80% Darrell Castle - though I've never heard of the guy. Constitution Party has a very nice ring to it, however.

Evan McMullin. It was a total surprise to me. I think that the weighting skewed the rsults because everyone else's "important" issues are not mine at all.

http://www.isidewith.com/elections/20...

I got 88% Johnson, 79% Stein. I think Johnson promotes this site b/c it's reasonably accurate and if you ask people what they think most people are for the gov't doing less.

Hillary talks there's no option. WIthout further adew, it's the Hillary. the dictaoiress to various radio talk show and talk program hosts. No choices. Using the word option.Not voting,she talks, increases Donald Trump will win. Then, don't vote, if one wants Donald Trump to win, indicating the country will win to a good number of people, and Hillary to lose, indicating the country will win, to a good number of people.

My results, and I expect for any Objectivist, showed Trump way ahead with Clinton relatively insignificant. However, the questions did not touch on Trump's worst areas, let alone his character and areas in question; and I don't sense it properly evaluates Johnson.