10

NASA Study Proves Carbon Dioxide Cools Atmosphere

Posted by $ Olduglycarl 7 years, 7 months ago to Science
55 comments | Share | Flag

Bet you never heard This in the lamestream...like the serpent coiled in a circle appearing to devour itself... NASA, (the beast) rats on itself.

PS. http://suspicious0bservers.org has suspected this for quite a while...even before 2013.
SOURCE URL: http://planet.infowars.com/science/nasa-study-proves-carbon-dioxide-cools-atmosphere


Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by dburro 7 years, 7 months ago
    CO2 is a "greenhouse" gas. I've seen it used in greenhouses to promote plant growth. Its well known that areas with vegetation cover are cooler than bare land. Rain forests are cooler than deserts. Higher CO2 levels generate more plant growth. The average temp in Palm Springs dropped by several degrees after people moved into the area, planted landscaping and built golf courses. Science is supposed to be based on objective observation, not speculative hypotheses and computer models. And then there is paleo-climatology, actual science that pretty much disproves all arguments for human caused climate change and reverses CO2 cause and effect relative to atmospheric temperature. Fraud or error? I know which one I pick.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ 7 years, 7 months ago
      Anthropogenic denier! laughing
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by lrshultis 7 years, 7 months ago
        A way off topic if I may. I keep forgetting to ask you of the bicameral mind knowledge, when did empathy enter the picture. It seems like awareness of empathy in relation to others must be necessary for one to even consider to move toward any kind of human or other animal values with regard to ones self, though the awareness of self must come first and maybe empathy close behind.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by $ 7 years, 7 months ago
          I'm just getting to a chapter that will tie that in, in the latest book on the progress of Jaynes's work.
          But it should be easy to understand that in order to have empathy one must at least imagine the experience of others if not have experienced that situation themselves. So yes that would be included in the introspection category. We might also see this as an evolution in mutuality and also the evolution of the emotion now expressed as love. We, as a species, still haven't reached the epitome of that emotion yet...despite the rhetoric of the times.

          I should also note that the ability to introspect didn't happen to all at the same time. Yes there was a time when the masses were effected but some others experience introspection way ahead of the pack. We see the same thing to day...examples given in "Spiral Dynamics" being, .01% of western society has entered the second tier of conscious thought, behavior and world view...Willbur expresses these two levels, like the other levels; as a meme of being able to recognize the meme's of others and being able to speak their language, "so to speak."

          Does that answer your question?
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by wiggys 7 years, 7 months ago
    imagine that the agency of the government stating a contradiction about the fact that the globe is NOT warming for any reason, but will that change the direction of those who think just the opposite is taking place; DOUBTFUL. they just want a reason to loot more.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by ProfChuck 7 years, 7 months ago
    Politicians selectively adopt or ignore NASA findings on climate stability depending on whether or not it serves their political agenda. For example, NASA has observed dramatic increases in global forestation in response to corresponding increases in atmospheric CO2. Carbon dioxide is plant food after all,. This means that an increase in CO2 stimulates a growth in natural carbon sequestration which tends to slow and even balance the carbon oxygen nitrogen ratios. This fact is conveniently ignored by the politicians that wish to use AGW as a political tool.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by term2 7 years, 7 months ago
    Government cools the planet too by slowing and eventually stopping civilization.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ 7 years, 7 months ago
      There were discussions by NASA about trying to inject nanotized particles into our ionosphere via a satellite in order to reflect more sunlight...how dumb can one get...the upper atmosphere is already reflecting 95% of the suns energy already!
      We are in for a cooling spell by all measures and observations and these dummies want to make it even worse.
      What bothers me is there is no discussion of how we can mitigate crop failures. Our ancestors had this figured out but in today's world things are different. There is more of us and many live in creation forsaken cities. There are folks that are developing growing systems to accommodate but they are getting no traction in the lamestream media.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by lrshultis 7 years, 7 months ago
    If 95% (From the last section of the out of date 2013 article) of solar radiation is bounced back to space, how can the Earth have an albedo of 30% in addition to that 5% reaching the surface or 0.05 x 0.30 = 0.015 or 1.5% or at zenith 0.015 x 1366 W/m^2 = 20.49 W/m^2 power at Earth's surface. Not enough to stay away from a snowball Earth.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by CTYankee 7 years, 7 months ago
    Please don't repost idiotic nonsense like this.

    CO2 is a greenhouse gas, period. That said, the whole MMGW nonsense is just that, period.

    The atmosphere has many modes to reject heat to space, but they all depend on two and only two things. The absolute temperature of the void, which is constant at a few degrees K above absolute zero, and the temperature of the 'planet' which is much much more difficult to define.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ 7 years, 7 months ago
      When gov. and Sci. try to baffle us with bull crap...you can always count on other Sci. to buffalo them right back with more accurate bull crap.

      Carbon Di. following temps is an indication the earth has a working thermostat that apparently works much better than the one in my office at work.

      Of course it's not the whole story;
      whether it's a worthy greenhouse gas to be considered at .03% is not my job...the idiots brought it up so it Up to us to shove it back down.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Comment hidden by post owner or admin, or due to low comment or member score. View Comment
    • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 7 years, 7 months ago
      CO2 is a natural part of the earth's cycle been around a few million years probably. Mother earth always has a way of keeping things in balance to the degree deemed necessary by mother earth. If it means killing off a few tree huggers so be it.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo