- Hot
- New
- Categories...
- Producer's Lounge
- Producer's Vault
- The Gulch: Live! (New)
- Ask the Gulch!
- Going Galt
- Books
- Business
- Classifieds
- Culture
- Economics
- Education
- Entertainment
- Government
- History
- Humor
- Legislation
- Movies
- News
- Philosophy
- Pics
- Politics
- Science
- Technology
- Video
- The Gulch: Best of
- The Gulch: Bugs
- The Gulch: Feature Requests
- The Gulch: Featured Producers
- The Gulch: General
- The Gulch: Introductions
- The Gulch: Local
- The Gulch: Promotions
- Marketplace
- Members
- Store
- More...
Under socialism the government openly and unabashedly owns the means of production. Under fascism it only exercises control over the "private entities" which are the means of production. Now we can quibble about whether you truly own something if you don't have control over it, but from a mechanistic point of view it is an important distinction between fascism and socialism.
Despite the popular misconception, fascism has little or nothing to do with racism. The nazis were socialists, not fascists. Nationalistic and racist, but socialists nonetheless.
The ACA doesn't give ownership of the medical or health field to the government, but it gives it control over it. That makes it farther into fascism than into socialism. Contrast this with "public schools" which are indeed owned by the government with putative control by the people. That is socialist.
Fascist is still a label the looters don't like. Claim obamacare is socialist and its supporters don't bat an eyelash. They might even be proud of it. Point out it is fascist and they flip their gourd on you.
Do believe I was taught that in school and that's been reinforced by conservative radio talk show hosts. .
Actually, I don't care who is right.
I'd rather call progressives fascist anyway.
So thanks. I'll do that.
see,..these idiots seek to do this backasswards by holding value creating societies down but not rising up worthless pagan bicameral societies.
Precisely the point of the TPP, if I am not mistaken!
The globalist wants to rule the world. One world order... No thank's.
Regards,
O.A.