Galt's Gulch

The Hillary Clinton-FBI report reveals classified-markings confusion

Posted by $ nickursis 7 years, 7 months ago to Government
6 comments | Share | Flag

This is just so sad that this Beast is still running. She is a criminal and a traitor, for lying about classified material. Period. Look at the article, and the release, you will see (UC\FOUO) with the FOUO marked out. That means "Unclassified" and "For Official Use Only". Notice they marked through the FOUO as they could not release it with it, because you GO TO FRIGGING JAIL. So, since she is too damn stupid to know (C) means "Confidential (which is in the security briefing that she signs a document saying she will abide by the security system before she takes office, WHY ISN"T SHE IN JAIL? Answer: A corrupt, lying, manipulative administration (and not unique, they all have been for the last 80 years folks). They alll need to go, from top to bottom, and start a new system where you serve 1 term and then OUT, no retirement, no pension, no re-election. The only way to clean up the sewer we call the Federal Government.
SOURCE URL: http://www.businessinsider.com/hillary-clinton-fbi-report-classified-markings-2016-9

Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

    -
  • Posted by ObjectiveAnalyst 7 years, 7 months ago
    Hello nickursis,
    There are only two possibilities; she is either inept/reckless, disconnected from reality, or a lying opportunist to the point of criminality. Either option should disqualify her.
    "...the sewer we call the Federal Government." Sterculinum publicum!
    Hillary is the epitome of the type of career politician that has made it so.
    Worse: There are so many that blindly support her, usually for purely emotional/cosmetic reasons.
    Respectfully,
    O.A.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    -
  • Posted by mminnick 7 years, 7 months ago
    Hillary stated 3 dozen times (so the report states) that she doesn't remember many things about the classification debacle due to her concussion. If it affected her that much, doesn't it call into question her medical qualifications to serve as president?
    Either she is not medically qualified or she lied (I'm betting on lied). In either case her capability to serve in the office must be extremely limited due to eith mental /physical issues or moral and legal issues. In either case, she is not now qualified if she ever was.
    BTW. This calls Obama's judgment into even further question since he states "... most qualified person to ever run for the presidency"
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden by post owner or admin, or due to low comment or member score. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 7 years, 7 months ago
    Let's see. Intent doesn't count when it comes to natinal security. It's out of the picture. Just a question of did or didn't. Did she do it or did she not do it? She did on multiple occasions. Did it materially affect National Security? Ask the parents of those killed in Benghazi or those who will be killed because she blabbed about the next targeting sequences. Etc. Etc. Etc.

    She's a poor version of a great Tom Clancy movie. And now points to her time in the Senate where she did not much as proof she knows about national security. Ever feel like checking your wallet.That has nothing to with anything. Did she do it or did she not do it.? Or blamed others for leading her astray. Nothing to do with it . Did she do it or did she not do it?

    She states she never was briefed nor read up on natinal securiy? Nothing to do with it. Did she do it or did she not do it.

    Didn't know it was not and approved method? Did she do it or did she not do it?

    I had an owie and it huut my haid? Did she do it or did she not do it.

    That's all that coutns.

    Be glad they didn't use the Patriot Act. She'd be disappeared and probably executed on 'suspicion of''

    In this country, today, the rest is just Bull Spit.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ nickursis 7 years, 7 months ago
      It is sad we cannot even tell the truth any more and be responsible for our actions, just make excuses. Reminds me of a case of a man named "Lee" from China. it was on NASA mysteries. He disappeared after having been associated with leading edge tech at Ohio State and working on the next Mars lander. He ran back to China, after 20 years, and his wife got caught trying to remove all his data and laptop. No one wanted to say "spy" or "20 years of being screwed". The government cannot take ownership of their screwups and even in this case says "It is very suspicious". Really? Huge amounts stolen from us, used to develop all kinds of ultra tech, just so China steals it. They announced that they will be doing their own Mars lander with no preparation or testing, just go for it. Maybe because we did it all for them? The Beast is just as bad, and the results just the same.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo