10

Why the University of Chicago rejects political correctness and 'intellectual safe spaces'

Posted by ObjectiveAnalyst 7 years, 7 months ago to Education
20 comments | Share | Flag

Why the University of Chicago rejects political correctness and 'intellectual safe spaces'
A victory for free speech: Or, How to prepare for the real world.

"Our commitment to academic freedom means that we do not support so-called trigger warnings, we do not cancel invited speakers because their topics might prove controversial and we do not condone the creation of intellectual safe spaces where individuals can retreat from ideas and perspectives at odds with their own."
John (Jay) Ellison, the dean of students.

http://www.oregonlive.com/education/i...
SOURCE URL: http://www.oregonlive.com/education/index.ssf/2016/08/university_of_chicago_kicks_po.html


Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by $ allosaur 7 years, 7 months ago
    I am very pleasantly surprised that a university embraces the true diversity of freedom of thought in the so-called home city of O the Great and Powerful Divider.
    Me dino says "so-called" because methinks O's true home is where his imagined throne is.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Comment hidden by post owner or admin, or due to low comment or member score. View Comment
    • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 7 years, 7 months ago
      I thought his home city was with his bank vice president Grandmother in Hawaii. The humble beginnings he came from. He managed to cover up the 'privileged' background from the voters along with the rest of it.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Thoritsu 7 years, 7 months ago
    Great! About time this came back around...a little.

    Reading the article, I was reminded of my 17 yr old daughter scolding me for saying arts schools would be less rigorous in their reviews of incoming students as long as the students were paying their way.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Radio_Randy 7 years, 7 months ago
    I'm just amazed that a school in Obama's "home town" would be as strongly conservative as this.

    It's great that there are still small islands of common sense out there. They might as well kiss their Federal funds goodbye, though.

    BTW...I just saw the news that Gonzaga U., of Spokane, just hired the U. of Missouri's "fired" professor, Melissa Click. She's the ditz who tried to have a journalism student physically ejected from a student demonstration that he was covering. I wish them luck with her, even though she says she's changed. The only thing such liberals normally change is their tactics.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by lrshultis 7 years, 7 months ago
      Looks like the school is well balanced: liberal, conservative, and some libertarian leaning economists like Milton Friedman and Hayek in the past. Many well known graduates and faculty. Several faculty like Obama and Saul David Alinsky are usually not well liked by some Gulchers.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by Dobrien 7 years, 7 months ago
    Good evening ObjectiveAnalyst,
    It is a rare event today to see a university official
    Supporting free speech and honest discourse. Yet from that University we got Bernie Sanders.
    I used to think liberals were all about "do your own thing" now they are about everyone doing their thing.
    Regards,
    Dobrien
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ jdg 7 years, 7 months ago
      I don't see a contradiction there at all. Sanders is a socialist but he is refreshingly honest, and said what he would do if given power. And he is not beholden to anyone -- I think this is why the Dems don't want him. They're about their crony network.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by CircuitGuy 7 years, 7 months ago
    The safe space thing is nuts. I think it's hit its high water mark and is facing a backlash. My wife had an employee last spring who said a TA walked out of a class because the students respectfully asked questions critical of the TA's views. The TA had some line like "this dialogue is not respecting my comfort zone" or something like that; I can't remember. It's definitely gotten out of hand.

    I understand the 14 y/o saying it's sexist or binaristic to say she's going to want to hang out with boys. Of course she doesn't know what she's talking about. There's a huge difference between an innocent assumption and trying to undermine people based on their supposed group identity. It's easy not to know that at age 14.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by 7 years, 7 months ago
      Hello CircuitGuy,
      Indeed. Thank you for your contribution.
      14 is a most difficult age. I remember raising one of my nieces that was living with us at that age- what a handful! :)
      Respectfully,
      O.A.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by CircuitGuy 7 years, 7 months ago
        I mixed two issues. The TA had undergrad students, one of whom worked for my wife. The 14-y/o comment was a reference to Seinfeld's daughter in the linked article.

        I can understand a 14 y/o being confused more than a TA at a major university.

        In the case of the TA, the TA was giving socialistic ideas. According to my wife's employee, someone asked polite questions like, "okay, but how would that work if..." That violated her safe space or whatever and she left the class.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Stormi 7 years, 7 months ago
    I am not sure college is using the same connotation of free speech we would. Kudos for the shut down of "safe spaces", which may have more to do with keeping enrollment up. However, his wording on controversial speakers and allowing them on campus, sounds like a judgement in itself. They will allow it, even though, no one is expected to believe any of it. It was obviously aimed at conservative speakers. Why not, we expect our students to consider all sides and make informed choices after considering both points of view? I think they are playing to the conservative tution money first and foremost.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo