- Hot
- New
- Categories...
- Producer's Lounge
- Producer's Vault
- The Gulch: Live! (New)
- Ask the Gulch!
- Going Galt
- Books
- Business
- Classifieds
- Culture
- Economics
- Education
- Entertainment
- Government
- History
- Humor
- Legislation
- Movies
- News
- Philosophy
- Pics
- Politics
- Science
- Technology
- Video
- The Gulch: Best of
- The Gulch: Bugs
- The Gulch: Feature Requests
- The Gulch: Featured Producers
- The Gulch: General
- The Gulch: Introductions
- The Gulch: Local
- The Gulch: Promotions
- Marketplace
- Members
- Store
- More...
If the market goes south, we're going to be a lot worse off than we were in the early 1930's during the Great Depression - especially once all the rioting starts. It's not going to be a pretty world.
At any rate, a few years ago I was fond of saying "This is the 1996. We just reelected a center-left president. New technologies are poised to change everything, but we don't know how." Now this feels like 2000. I have reduced my exposure to large-cap equities and have started writing some in-the-money calls on SPY. I am not a permabull.
It's not in the interest of the state propaganda bureau to inform the people how bad the economy is performing. Maybe if they don't admit it, then the people won't blame them for causing it.
We should not be dependent on the gov't to provide the macroeconomic numbers we base business decisions on. People sometimes use numbers from industrial companies like Caterpiller (CAT) as a bellwether for the broader economy or they just focus on their industry's bellwethers . I don't see any inflation, and if I did, I don't see it as a problem unless it's large and/or unexpected. It's very easy to update prices now. The weird thing is I don't see it. I don't see suppliers raising prices or customers volunteering to pay a premium for faster service. Inflation feels stable in the 2% range. My concern is when it starts and central banks raise rates, the value assets (bonds, equities, a small local business) all will drop substantially..
Government uses "chained CPI" to account for people switching purchases to another commodity when the price gets too high on the one they actually would choose to buy. So now lots of people are eating 99 cents/lb chicken and pork when they'd much rather eat $9.99/lb beef and fish, but government ignores the increase in beef and fish prices because there are alternatives. This is rubbish and because the government then limits the CPI linked retirement increases to this unrealistic lower inflation, the retirees (who could afford steak when they were working and paid in heaps of taxes to support all those government consultants and lawyers Dom Perignon habits and congressional million-dollar retirement) now get to eat beans and rice instead.
Thanks Barrack, you ignorant savage!
I buy my coffee as green beans from an importer online and roast them using a hot air popcorn popper. Home roasting does lose about 10-15% weight compared to already roasted beans, but I pay about $5 to $6 per pound (up from $3-$4 a few yrs ago) incl shipping cost for fresh Sumatra green coffee beans, and home roasting in small batches (50gm) has much better flavor results due to freshness. Coffee prices do vary quite a bit on supply due to weather, too, but the trend is definitely up sharply.
Paper products contain lower square footage for the same price (paper towels and TP.) Lots of other products are lowering quality to keep prices down, in effect manufacturers are switching ingredients for cheaper ones, which hides the inflation even more because the quality degrades.
Government doesn't account for any of this because it hides their complicity in the con.
I've heard on this message board people are able to raise their prices significantly because of inflation. If it's true, you should find you cannot keep up with your customers' demand and cannot afford to pay and vendors without raising prices.
Kia Soul instead of Chevy Avalanche. Chicken instead of beef (better for you anyway tho)
If there is some way to use this information, there must be a way to get it without literally going to stores and working out the price of milk and candy bars. It seems like there's a way to pull this info from filings from large companies. I suggested Caterpiller (CAT) as a way to measure GDP. There must be some non-anecdotal way to get the consumer and producer price data you need to make investment decisions.
This outlook makes perfect sense to me.
I've been expecting inflation and then rate hikes for eight years, but we've seen just the opposite. Eventually they have to happen.
REITs have done well. A colleague years ago told me to invest in Realty Income Corp (O), but I didn't partly b/c of the rate concerns you mention.
One worry I have about financial services is the psychology of low rates. Many people accept zero interest rates as a fact of life. A piece of RE would rent for $1000/mo, they say, so assuming today's rates, that's worth $300k. A stock pays 2.5% dividends, and people hold it for the income. What's going to happen when rates double? We know those assets will be worth half. I would expect financial services people are on top of it, so they're stocks would be safe from this, since managing rate/credit risk is their main job, but I wrongly believed that in 2007-2009.
I reduced my large-cap stock exposure earlier this year. I write some calls on SPY and some individual stocks. I don't share your feeling that inflation is here already, but I do have a feeling that this is like 2000. This feels like 2000-- a stock market peak. Unlike in those days, rates are already at rock bottom, so I think inflation has to come. Unless automation and foreign trade mean traditional monetary policy doesn't apply. I heard about technology obviating traditional valuation methods in the year 2000. This is a peak.
Yep, this market is feeling a bit like a bubble. Eventually we will pay the price. If I had to put a date on the bubble pop it would be late 2018-2019. I plan on getting a lot more defensive before then. That's what worked for me in 2008.
Your example of the asset price drop works better for young bonds. With stocks there may be a tangible book value to support a floor over the long term. (Short term things can drop to unrealistic levels like when BAC was trading in the mid $2.00 with a tangible book value of over $10. That was a fun buying opportunity) Old bonds also have a redemption value that will help support a floor.
People have been saying this since the early 80s, arguing inflation wasn't decreasing as fast as people thought. I agree package sizes change, but this it's just part of normal "money illusion". Nothing new or different is happening now.
"If I had to put a date on the bubble pop it would be late 2018-2019."
I'm guessing 2017.
I agree completely on shifting toward short-term bonds and value stocks.
"like when BAC was trading in the mid $2.00 with a tangible book value of over $10."
How did you know they wouldn't fail? I correctly predicted the bust was coming, but I wrongly thought financial companies were totally on top of things and would come out ahead. I did not understand, so I was not buying financials except for as part of general large-cap funds.