Poor, poor, Chelsea

Posted by Robbie53024 11 years ago to News
19 comments | Share | Flag

Looks like she takes after her mother.

All Comments

  • Posted by H2ungar123 11 years ago in reply to this comment.
    Yes, that's her choice, but do we have to
    hear it, read it or see it?? Who really cares?
    But it's our choice to ignore it - and we will!!!
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by Robbie53024 11 years ago in reply to this comment.
    I wasn't going to say anything, as one cannot help the genes that they are dealt. But her husband certainly wasn't attracted by the curb appeal. ;-}
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ johnrobert2 11 years ago
    She also looks like her. I wonder if one of those "aging" programs will show the same progression as HRC?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Bobhummel 11 years ago
    When I think of philanthropists, I think of someone like John Huntsman, ( invented the foam molded egg carton and the Big Mac box, etc) and has made it his goal to spend every penny of his earned billions on cancer research and treatment (Huntsman Institute) and other noble programs that truly help people in need. And he does it all very quietly.
    The Clinton's are moochers and looters of the highest order. It is appropriate that initials of the Clinton's "Day Of Action" (on her very classy T-shirt) are DOA.
    Cheers
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ jbrenner 11 years ago in reply to this comment.
    I intentionally left the Clinton aspect out of my comment for just that reason. My comment was meant to apply far more generally. People respect the money they have earned themselves. Many who do not earn wealth, and yet have it, treat money cavalierly. This is implied in Francisco's money speech.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by freedomforall 11 years ago
    Of course NBC is paying her $600,000 a year. NBC is such a pathetic looter, they need all the political 'pull' they can get. Chelsea thinks everyone who is unemployed (like she is) should haven't a care in the world. F^&*ing monarchist.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by Robbie53024 11 years ago in reply to this comment.
    And it is oh so easy not to care about money when you have more than most people could ever hope to have.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by Robbie53024 11 years ago in reply to this comment.
    And just so nobody confuses anything, I never agreed that the C's are achievers. They are Looters and Moochers of the worst sort.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ jbrenner 11 years ago
    Isn't it kind of scary what a high percentage of children of achievers turn into philanthropists? The degree of altruism seems to be proportional to the amount of unearned wealth.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by Robbie53024 11 years ago in reply to this comment.
    Which would be OK if they only wanted to give away their own money. No, instead they want to take OUR money and give it away.
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo