The Daily Lie(s) CNNN Clinton No News Network - 1, 2 ,3 4 for 8/24/16- Hillary lies when she doesn't have to and Hillary in Army Training Film. Hillarys Media Cakewalk and one more it's only 6AM EST
Hillary Lies Even When She Doesn’t Have To
Ed Klein Posted: Aug 24, 2016 12:01 AM
Hillary Clinton has been caught lying again—and this time it’s serious, because she lied to the FBI, which is a federal crime punishable by a fine and/or imprisonment.
During her 3 ½-hour interview with the FBI on July 2, she told investigators that former Secretary of State Colin Powell had advised her to use a personal email account during a private dinner.
Powell denies the story.
“The truth is she was using [her personal email] for a year before I sent her a memo telling her what I did [when I was in office],” he told the New York Post’s Page Six. “Her people have been trying to pin it on me.”
Asked why Clinton’s team was attempting to blame him, he responded, “Why do you think?”
It will come as no surprise to those who have read my books that Hillary is a liar.
Of course, I was not the first person to make that discovery.
In 1996, New York Times columnist William Safire labeled her a “congenital liar.”
Carl Bernstein , in his biography of Hillary, A Woman in Charge, noted that she indulged in “subterfuge and eliding.”
David Geffen, the Hollywood mogul, famously said, “Everyone in politics lies, but [the Clintons] do it with such ease, it’s troubling.”
2. This one was featured yesterday and is gaining traction.
Whoops: Clinton Featured On Insider Threats Training Slide For U.S. Army
http://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvesp...
3. Hillary Clinton's Cakewalk With the Press
Brent Bozell Posted: Aug 24, 2016 12:01 AM
There is Now No Doubt Now: The Media Are Biased, and Obama Doesn't Care About Black People
The media coverage of the presidential race is so tilted to the Democrats that even liberal analysts feel obliged to declare it. USA Today media columnist Michael Wolff asserted that this campaign isn't between Trump and Clinton. It's between Trump and the media that have turned against him in a big way.
During the Republican primaries they were initially bemused, and then they acknowledged Trump as a serious populist challenge to the status quo. Their coverage wasn't positive, but it was voluminous, crowding out everyone else. He hit back, and they let him, marveling at his brass knuckles. The media aimed to drive a serious wedge into the conservative base of the GOP, and they succeeded.
But as Wolff writes, "Now, appalled by their own creation, the media have become, with quite some religious fervor, the defender of truth, justice, morality and proper public behavior, all focused on (Trump's) undoing." As a result, "Clinton will walk into the White House having faced the least amount of scrutiny, criticism and antipathy of any major-party nominee in modern media history."
One could argue that Wolff missed the Barack Obama Swoon of 2008, but there was a big difference. Obama was a presidential rookie with little time on the national stage. There are over 20 years of Clinton in positions of national power (including first lady) to evaluate.
But here we go again. This rerun was entirely predictable. The TV networks are pretending all Clinton scandals are ancient and dreadfully boring. Instead, her experience is presented as an enormous plus compared to that billionaire ruffian.
The media shamelessly proclaim that they are working for a disastrous Trump loss. The New York Times put its own media columnist, Jim Rutenberg, on the front page sounding the battle cry, insisting that Trump is a dangerous demagogue with a deeply racist message and that he must be stopped so the media can stand tall in "history's judgment."
Here's where Wolff goes off the tracks. He asks, "Once Trump is dispatched, how does the media, suddenly realizing they did her work, regard (Clinton)?" Wolff answers his question thusly: "The media seek to claim as much power as they can. In creating Trump and destroying him, they have found a new certainty and authority. This enhanced power and uninhibited sense of outrage and virtue are sure to elect Clinton (and) then, of course, (to) viciously turn on her."
Nonsense. That theory only makes sense if you're Hillary Clinton, who always imagines that the press despises her. If the press really hated her, could she go nine months without a news conference? Obama's been the worst president in history in prosecuting reporters. Has he suffered consequences? They have no "uninhibited sense of outrage and virtue." With Democrats, they abandon any professional self-respect.
Like Team Obama, Hillary & Co. claims she's done hundreds of individual interviews, so who needs a press conference? When left to themselves, liberal journalists can't get beyond pleasantries. But put them together in a room and they might start to feel obligated to ask questions tougher than "How do you feel?" and "What will you eventually tell your grandchildren about today?"
On scandals like her private email server, Clinton keeps unloading major whoppers, like telling the FBI that former Secretary of State Colin Powell told her to set up the private server. Even Powell, who has endorsed Obama twice, is shaking his head at this blame game.
Accountability? Transparency? These aren't watchwords for the left. They are only used as nice-sounding buzzwords to tear Republicans down.
How will they view Clinton if she's elected? As a triumph of "history."
4. Ben Shapiro Posted: Aug 24, 2016 12:01 AM
Hillary's Corruption Is Overwhelming
After over two decades in the heart of America's spotlight, Hillary Clinton is still an unknown quantity for most Americans. That's thanks to one factor and one factor only: the love and worship of the mainstream media.
Over the weekend, no less than six terrible stories broke that would have crippled anyone else's campaign.
Clinton aide and confidante Huma Abedin acted as assistant editor on the radical Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs, where she greenlit pieces that stated that "pushing (mothers) out into the open labor market is a clear demonstration of a lack of respect of womanhood and motherhood," among other things.
Clinton had blamed former Secretary of State Colin Powell for giving her the idea to set up a private email server at a dinner party, and that Powell not only denied giving her the idea but also denied ever having a dinner conversation with her on the topic. ..
Clinton State Department oversaw $6 billion in mismanagement, fraud and incompetence.
Clinton's pay-for-play -- Clinton Foundation donations in exchange for access to the State Department -- ran deeper than originally thought.
We learned that the FBI and Justice Department are investigating the Podesta Group -- co-founded by Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta -- over its ties with former Ukrainian President and Vladimir Putin ally Viktor Yanukovych.
Finally, we found out that the the FBI uncovered some 15,000 emails that Clinton failed to disclose to the State Department.
So, what was the media's response to this tidal wave of incompetence and corruption?
http://townhall.com/columnists/bensha... Use URL Link or go to townhall.com and find the same headline.
The media are still the gatekeepers, and they still have no intention of allowing Clinton to become the story." Article ends
Ed Klein Posted: Aug 24, 2016 12:01 AM
Hillary Clinton has been caught lying again—and this time it’s serious, because she lied to the FBI, which is a federal crime punishable by a fine and/or imprisonment.
During her 3 ½-hour interview with the FBI on July 2, she told investigators that former Secretary of State Colin Powell had advised her to use a personal email account during a private dinner.
Powell denies the story.
“The truth is she was using [her personal email] for a year before I sent her a memo telling her what I did [when I was in office],” he told the New York Post’s Page Six. “Her people have been trying to pin it on me.”
Asked why Clinton’s team was attempting to blame him, he responded, “Why do you think?”
It will come as no surprise to those who have read my books that Hillary is a liar.
Of course, I was not the first person to make that discovery.
In 1996, New York Times columnist William Safire labeled her a “congenital liar.”
Carl Bernstein , in his biography of Hillary, A Woman in Charge, noted that she indulged in “subterfuge and eliding.”
David Geffen, the Hollywood mogul, famously said, “Everyone in politics lies, but [the Clintons] do it with such ease, it’s troubling.”
2. This one was featured yesterday and is gaining traction.
Whoops: Clinton Featured On Insider Threats Training Slide For U.S. Army
http://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvesp...
3. Hillary Clinton's Cakewalk With the Press
Brent Bozell Posted: Aug 24, 2016 12:01 AM
There is Now No Doubt Now: The Media Are Biased, and Obama Doesn't Care About Black People
The media coverage of the presidential race is so tilted to the Democrats that even liberal analysts feel obliged to declare it. USA Today media columnist Michael Wolff asserted that this campaign isn't between Trump and Clinton. It's between Trump and the media that have turned against him in a big way.
During the Republican primaries they were initially bemused, and then they acknowledged Trump as a serious populist challenge to the status quo. Their coverage wasn't positive, but it was voluminous, crowding out everyone else. He hit back, and they let him, marveling at his brass knuckles. The media aimed to drive a serious wedge into the conservative base of the GOP, and they succeeded.
But as Wolff writes, "Now, appalled by their own creation, the media have become, with quite some religious fervor, the defender of truth, justice, morality and proper public behavior, all focused on (Trump's) undoing." As a result, "Clinton will walk into the White House having faced the least amount of scrutiny, criticism and antipathy of any major-party nominee in modern media history."
One could argue that Wolff missed the Barack Obama Swoon of 2008, but there was a big difference. Obama was a presidential rookie with little time on the national stage. There are over 20 years of Clinton in positions of national power (including first lady) to evaluate.
But here we go again. This rerun was entirely predictable. The TV networks are pretending all Clinton scandals are ancient and dreadfully boring. Instead, her experience is presented as an enormous plus compared to that billionaire ruffian.
The media shamelessly proclaim that they are working for a disastrous Trump loss. The New York Times put its own media columnist, Jim Rutenberg, on the front page sounding the battle cry, insisting that Trump is a dangerous demagogue with a deeply racist message and that he must be stopped so the media can stand tall in "history's judgment."
Here's where Wolff goes off the tracks. He asks, "Once Trump is dispatched, how does the media, suddenly realizing they did her work, regard (Clinton)?" Wolff answers his question thusly: "The media seek to claim as much power as they can. In creating Trump and destroying him, they have found a new certainty and authority. This enhanced power and uninhibited sense of outrage and virtue are sure to elect Clinton (and) then, of course, (to) viciously turn on her."
Nonsense. That theory only makes sense if you're Hillary Clinton, who always imagines that the press despises her. If the press really hated her, could she go nine months without a news conference? Obama's been the worst president in history in prosecuting reporters. Has he suffered consequences? They have no "uninhibited sense of outrage and virtue." With Democrats, they abandon any professional self-respect.
Like Team Obama, Hillary & Co. claims she's done hundreds of individual interviews, so who needs a press conference? When left to themselves, liberal journalists can't get beyond pleasantries. But put them together in a room and they might start to feel obligated to ask questions tougher than "How do you feel?" and "What will you eventually tell your grandchildren about today?"
On scandals like her private email server, Clinton keeps unloading major whoppers, like telling the FBI that former Secretary of State Colin Powell told her to set up the private server. Even Powell, who has endorsed Obama twice, is shaking his head at this blame game.
Accountability? Transparency? These aren't watchwords for the left. They are only used as nice-sounding buzzwords to tear Republicans down.
How will they view Clinton if she's elected? As a triumph of "history."
4. Ben Shapiro Posted: Aug 24, 2016 12:01 AM
Hillary's Corruption Is Overwhelming
After over two decades in the heart of America's spotlight, Hillary Clinton is still an unknown quantity for most Americans. That's thanks to one factor and one factor only: the love and worship of the mainstream media.
Over the weekend, no less than six terrible stories broke that would have crippled anyone else's campaign.
Clinton aide and confidante Huma Abedin acted as assistant editor on the radical Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs, where she greenlit pieces that stated that "pushing (mothers) out into the open labor market is a clear demonstration of a lack of respect of womanhood and motherhood," among other things.
Clinton had blamed former Secretary of State Colin Powell for giving her the idea to set up a private email server at a dinner party, and that Powell not only denied giving her the idea but also denied ever having a dinner conversation with her on the topic. ..
Clinton State Department oversaw $6 billion in mismanagement, fraud and incompetence.
Clinton's pay-for-play -- Clinton Foundation donations in exchange for access to the State Department -- ran deeper than originally thought.
We learned that the FBI and Justice Department are investigating the Podesta Group -- co-founded by Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta -- over its ties with former Ukrainian President and Vladimir Putin ally Viktor Yanukovych.
Finally, we found out that the the FBI uncovered some 15,000 emails that Clinton failed to disclose to the State Department.
So, what was the media's response to this tidal wave of incompetence and corruption?
http://townhall.com/columnists/bensha... Use URL Link or go to townhall.com and find the same headline.
The media are still the gatekeepers, and they still have no intention of allowing Clinton to become the story." Article ends
