She doesn't have to. But the system is rigged in favor of the Dems. They've been slowly putting in place the fix since Bush I. They know that all they have to do is corrupt a few counties in Florida, Ohio, and a few other places and it tips the scales in their favor. And they've been spreading out since. The biggest threat is Voter ID laws, which is why they've been fighting them as racist in the court system even though they have no evidence that any of the laws disenfranchise anyone but the illegal voter!

But why does that mean she has to win this time?
If that always occurs, why this time more than any
other?

I'd love to see David Clarke as head of Justice. +1

In states with no voter ID, fraud is very professionally organized. A list of registered voters is assembled, and their voting record is matched. Those who have never voted, or vote infrequently, or appear to have stopped voting (these can be nursing home residents, persons who have left the state, or even deceased). These names are handed out to "volunteers" (usually paid) that may be felons, illegals, or simply people who make a habit of voting numerous times under other people's names, and the games begin. This kind of fraud is seldom detected, since absent voters are completely unaware of their stolen vote.

States with voter ID will definitely be targets of aggressive hacking, aimed at changing votes and/or simply inflating numbers. Looking at several past elections, the latter is the reason vote totals in some locations were more than the number of legally registered voters.

States like Oklahoma are harder to defraud, since voter ID is required, and the ballot is executed on paper before being scanned in. Having a paper trail makes it possible to contest questionable results.

I fear for our country.

It's sad to say, but the first black president (Bill Clinton) was a disaster, the first actual elected black president was a double disaster, and if SHE wins, the first elected woman president will be a triple disaster. Why can't we come up with a Margaret Thatcher? David Clarke for Chief Law Enforcement Officer!

Ditto

You mean like the Bush/Gore race?

She already did, by getting Trump to run. He has no intention of winning and never did.

The good news is she apparently has Parkinson's, so Kaine will be running the country.

I dont hope she is fine. She is a very evil and manipulative woman who has done bad things and will do more if she has more power

Certainly.

There is lots of talk of her health, now. That's irrelevant too. People need to understand that what's really desired on this is just a human place-holder who will cowtow to the special interests. She could be very, very ill and still serve her purpose for them. And, I wish her no ill health. I hope she's fine.

Remember...when you are accosted by BLM members with clubs and sticks, that they are allowed in polling places, but guns are not.

Just like Barry's first term...

If Mrs. Clinton wins, America is pretty much over. If she wins via fraud -- what's worse than "over?"
In a way, I'm fortunate to have been born in a time when there still was the American experiment. If the left wins and the country, which has already fallen apart, burns to ashes, at least I won't be here to see it.

I do think that when it comes right down to it, Trump would be a more responsible president. He had to be in his own company, and I think that way of working would carry over to the office of president. He definitely isnt politically correct, which I dont care about at all. You say what you think and then its out there to analyze and consider before you act.

I agree with the last sentence. But Trump can't win. He's just an awful candidate. I agree that many of Hillary's policies are worse than Trump's, but she'd have a harder time getting them enacted IMO in a GOP legislature. She will do less damage.
I think Johnson has a chance. We will see in November.

I wonder what dirt would have to surface to actually turn her supporters against her. Its amazing she gets this far.
Maybe if it was proven that she put out a hit on one of her detractors. Maybe that would do it, but she would deny and deny until november and then she would never be convicted.

YES!

I think what scares me is that she has such a following. It wouldnt matter really if she dropped out of the race. There are others ready to step in there with the same message. Sanders nearly was nominated by the Democrats, and a lot of his support is the young people- very scary.

If she dies on her own, we would wind up with her running mate, who is pretty much a committed socialist too.

Democrats have depended upon some form of voter fraud for generations. From the intimidation of the KKK to the cemetery vote in Chicago, Democrats have been rigging the vote. This will be no different. The only way they lose is when to numbers are overwhelming.

Hillary is the worst by FAR. She is the posterchild for cronyism by FAR. She lies, hides, and isnt even capable of protecting her own consulate in Benghazi.
What I meant is that Trump is right in identifying whats wrong in the current system. So was Sanders. I dont really agree with either of them as to the solutions presented so far.

BUT, what we need is someone to tell us when the emperor has no clothes. THEN solutions can be investigated with the congress and the best ones implemented. No presidential candidate is going to be up to speed as to the proper solutions on all the issues until they have been president for at least a short bit.

Look at Hillary's $15 and hour minimum wage- its ridiculous and will definitely result in a 20% reduction in the workforce at my small business for example. No question about it.

Trump is saying we are being hurt by trade from China. He is right about that. Its a one way street right now. But putting tariffs on trade wouldnt do a damn thing, and he knows it. But he is telling the Chinese to open up THEIR markets to us in no uncertain terms. Its a negotiating tactic.

As to immigration from south america, its already going the other way !! Wall isnt even needed, but IF you have a border, then it should be regulated. Otherwise open the border. Thats all he is saying.

As to Muslims, I have to agree that at the current time, given islam is big into "kill the infidels", we have a big problem letting muslims into America. Look at what happened in Germany. They let in millions of them, and they have violence and terrorism as a result. I dont want that here until we can figure a way to insure that the people we let in share our basic values. Thats all Trump said too.

The media hates him and pound on him constantly, all the time giving Hillary a free pass on all the crap she has done. If its going to be Hillary OR Trump who is ultimately elected, I cant see how anyone can choose Hillary.

I have been in the small business arena for a long time. Today, its very much harder to do anything of substance in that arena (except for possible exceptions in social media).

Manufacturing is dead here because of regulations, taxes, paperwork requirements, and competition from countries like china. Not to mention liability fears.

Unless you have government connections now, its very hard to really get anywhere. Cronyism is everywhere and getting worse with the posterchild Hillary.

America might "kick ass" relative to some countries, but certainly not all. Medical care is not as good here as many other countries. We can criticize the government, but look what happened to Trump when he threatened the crooked establishment. I predict no one will ever try that again. He wasted his $50 million, but I do think he really wanted to make america great again in a lot of areas.
There is so much hatred of Trump for battling the establishment that he will never make it.

The liberals I have spoken with correctly do not care if Hillary is guilty of various crimes: All they care about is that she will enact the programs, policies, and philosophies they believe in. Since these policies involve a lot of 'taking' and a belief that 'Since I am one of the correct-thinking elite, rules do not really apply to me.' it is immaterial to them if Hillary is 'first in taking' on a personal level as well.

I think that she will probably win. The only chance that she will not is if the polls reflect a bias of conservatives being asked less often/ being less willing to be surveyed. If that is the case, then there might be enough secret voters to tip the scales, even if a thumb is on it.

Jan

Careful. That kind of thing gets you looked at by the Secret Service.

I don't think any kind of outside intervention is necessary. Her own personal health problems are doing her in.

I would have said "hope for" but yes

Never doubted this for a second.

In fact if truth were known, I would bet Obama stole the election as well.

The question is, WHAT ARE WE GOING TO DO ABOUT IT!