15

The Bizarre Media Blackout Of Hacked George Soros Documents

Posted by $ nickursis 7 years, 8 months ago to Government
82 comments | Share | Flag

Poster boy for the Beast. And one of her money boys. And a sign of the future. We are in deep doo...
SOURCE URL: http://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/the-bizarre-media-blackout-of-hacked-george-soros-documents/


Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • 12
    Posted by $ allosaur 7 years, 8 months ago
    If the Koch brothers got hacked, their data and wannabe projects would be plastered all over the place by the "mainstream" media..
    Lib pundits would issue scathing editorials while Chirs Matthews, Rachel Maddow and Chris Hayes would each be spending at least a full hour of show time on the schemes and dreams of those--ugh! filthy rich-- conservative evildoers.
    George Soros?
    Move along. Nothing to see here.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Comment hidden by post owner or admin, or due to low comment or member score. View Comment
    • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 7 years, 8 months ago
      Add in the Waltons the only corporation that gives jobs to senior citizens in need of devalued retirement assistance. I don't see the rest of them doing squat. listen up soon to retire miltary when you need that fat retirements lost buying value supplemented don't think COLA think WalMart ....That's yiour future unless your one of the sell outs in Flag Rank.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by dbhalling 7 years, 8 months ago
    I think that it is likely Soros has inside information or even cronies inside some of the central banks around the world and that was partly how he made so much money in currency speculation..
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by Herb7734 7 years, 8 months ago
    I can't keep track of all the wheels within wheels within wheels. The Bildebergers, the Bavarian Illuminati, etc.etc. I haven't a clue as to the relationship between billionaires and how they directly affect me. I know how to run my life and what is right and wrong, true and untrue. If more people were like that, the billionaires would have no power.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ splumb 7 years, 8 months ago
    The sooner that evil bastard is in the ground, the better.
    I have a bottle of champagne waiting patiently in the fridge, ready for that glorious day.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by mia767ca 7 years, 8 months ago
    another reason Clinton Foundation is organized in Canada...so that you do not have to disclosed the donors...and you cannot know who donated what to whom...
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Comment hidden by post owner or admin, or due to low comment or member score. View Comment
    • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 7 years, 8 months ago
      Doesn't seem to be working. The incidents of doing special favors out of school and receipt of very large donations is too coincidental and hardly non-disclosed.

      A side thought. One of Obamas most frequent visitors at the White House is the infamous Soros. Will Hillary charge him rent like BHO Fiddley or consider the whole relationship to be a life time paid up subscription?
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ 7 years, 8 months ago
      If that is indeed so, I would say that if the mainstream media has not dug into that and blatantly asked "why" so that that fact is widely known, that there is some form of collusion between them all, that is something that the Libertarians should latch onto.Why would such a "patriot" have the need to form their "Presidential" foundation in another country? To cover the crap of course.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by term2 7 years, 8 months ago
    It's not surprising. The media, along with their poster child Hillary are looking to run our country. Trump may not be perfect but he is standing against what the media is doing. And they are attacking him relentlessly for it. People should be disgusted with the media at this point and stop supporting it
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by DrZarkov99 7 years, 8 months ago
    American media tops the old Soviet Pravda in its obeisance to the state. Our bureaucracy is solidly left wing, doing everything possible to evolve what I call the United Socialist Subordinancy of America (USSA), due to the dismissal of even a pretense of the rights of states or individuals. With the Soros hacked documents, we're seeing the cold blooded plans of the assassin of our last hope for liberty.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by Dobrien 7 years, 8 months ago
    "I fancy myself as some type of god."George Soros. Evil man he is a Bilderberg leader and a front man for the Rothschild Illuminatti.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ 7 years, 8 months ago
      OK.....While there is lots of anecdotal evidence for the two groups, the lack of hard data is a problem. Maybe intended to be that way, but it limits what anyone will ever do in that regard.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Comment hidden by post owner or admin, or due to low comment or member score. View Comment
      • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 7 years, 8 months ago
        On the other hand the hard evidence against Soros is not anecdotal. The arrogant ass now feels safe enough to operate in the open but then it was decades ago he opted to take over the USA and turn it socialist About half the time the Progressives have been running their little revolution against a Constitutional Republic.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by $ 7 years, 8 months ago
          Using his money.I wonder how he made it all...
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
          • Comment hidden by post owner or admin, or due to low comment or member score. View Comment
          • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 7 years, 8 months ago
            He's basically an investment banker and been known to make miracle deals that both make millions or more in a day or so and skate on the ragged edge of illegal. Been hauled before the courrts several times for illegalities and managed to come out ok but with a smell. US Citizen but taxes paid unknown and banks in his banks in Curacao hob nobs with another secular backer named Peter Lewis the CEO of Progressive Insurance, George Clooney the actor, George Lykoff who authors books on secular progressivism a professor of cognitives at Berkely including their activiists bible or operations manual mosly cribbed materials fro mothers and of course and of course one Hillary Rodham Clinton. Do a google but like all of his bunch pure evil. masquerading as a do gooder.

            Hillary gets elected George who is already a frequent visitor at the White House will be her chief adviser, mentor and controller. like getting a combination Hitler and Staliln rolled up in one.

            Vote for Hillary you mights well be talking to President Soros.

            And that is the main difference between Hillary and Trump. He may be a flawed capitalist but he's not under Soros's thumb.
            Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
            • Posted by Dobrien 7 years, 8 months ago
              Soros and Black Wednesday 9/15/92. About 2 years previously the Brits entered into a agreement with Eu to maintain a range on the rate of exchange tied to the mark as British inflation was 3x Germany the pound was moving toward the low end of the range . For 2 months Soro was shorting the pound , as govt policy decisions added to the weakness. I suppose it was good luck and not knowledge of govt actions in advance that soros benefitted from.
              When the govt. was unable to keep the pound above the agreed rate. Britain was forced to with draw from the ERM (Euro Exchange Rate Mechanism).
              Soros on 9/15/92 began massive selling .
              Brits had emergency meetings and on the morning of the 16th they attempted to prop the pound by buying ,unfortunately Soros was selling so heavily and fast that the pound was overwhelmed. He made a billion and the British tax payers lost 3.3 billion pounds plus they got a recession.
              Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
              • Posted by $ 7 years, 8 months ago
                And thus an example of hoe fragile the financial system is, and the manipulation that is possible. So, if the monetary system can be so, what is to say the politics can't? So is all the huff and puff we see from the 2 crap candidates more manipulation?
                Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                • Posted by Dobrien 7 years, 8 months ago
                  I have to say , the fix is in. "No reasonable prosecutors would........" Hard to believe these are the candidates after the last 8 destructive years. In the word of OldUglyCarl kakistocrats.
                  Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
              • Comment hidden by post owner or admin, or due to low comment or member score. View Comment
              • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 7 years, 8 months ago
                He's well known for using insider information and has been taken to task on more than one occasion. but somehow always slips through the net. Funny thing is how come his taxes are being scrutinized considering the amounts involved and their locations.
                Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
            • Posted by $ 7 years, 8 months ago
              Sounds like Hillary Beast got lessons from him on how to scam and get away with it, she stinks like a camel ass, but the sheeple have no nose...I was going to take Trump if I had too, just because a loon is preferable ofver a blatent criminal. Trump may only get us in a war or 2, The beast will get us in 4 or more, none of them we start, just because everyone will know the Obamanation incompetency party has 8 more years, unless she bursts a blood vessel in one of her mental moments. Trump has his too, but his are just looney toon moments, she is dangerous....
              Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
              • Comment deleted.
                • Posted by freedomforall 7 years, 8 months ago
                  RINO is Republican In Name Only.
                  Trump is the consummate RINO.
                  A near perfect fraud who has never supported the principles of limited government, free markets (without favors negotiated by Trump et al), and equal treatment under law for all regardless of their connections or net asset balance. RINO should be the slogan on every Trumpeteer bumper sticker because it is the truth.
                  Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                  • Posted by Rolf 7 years, 8 months ago
                    I used to enjoy reading a lot of the posts here, but recently they have been very discouraging, somewhat along the lines of freedomforall's comment. I will only reply by saying that according to this logic, I should vote for Clinton because she is just a murderer, not a RINO!
                    Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                    • Posted by freedomforall 7 years, 8 months ago
                      No, Rolf, you have misundertood my meaning. You should vote on rational principles intead of in fear.
                      Clinton wants you to vote for her in fear of Trump.
                      Trump wants you vote for him in fear of Clinton.
                      They are both disgusting statist looters who have not earned and never will deserve your vote.
                      Buying in to this lesser evil rubbish is a primary reason we have the pathetic excuse for liberty that the GOP/Dems have created in the past 30 years.
                      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                      • Posted by Rolf 7 years, 8 months ago
                        No, I really didn't misunderstand. It's just this attitude that I supposedly have in that, because of fear, I will vote for the lesser of two evils, is part of what's driving me away from this site. Unless and until the desired candidate (for any office) conforms to the ideals of the Rand idealology they should receive my vote. In principal absolutely true; in today's reality, not a chance in Hell will there ever be someone with these principles AND the money required to run for office. Raised in Hannover Germany in the late '30's and naturalized here in the mid 60's, I have seen enough to be discouraged to the point of "Just give me some change (not chains, like Obama promised and delivered)." Should that candidate ever appear, I will absolutely vote for him. Until then.......
                        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                        • Comment hidden by post owner or admin, or due to low comment or member score. View Comment
                        • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 7 years, 8 months ago
                          Until then you can use objectivism to validate or not validate any belief system especially those political but the final choice is not one any of us propose or support but the choice you yourself make after testing it and applying your own set of moral values. Until then.... even after then your observations, your testing and your conclusions coupled with your ethics are all that matters. Your decision. From your comments (and I shoud interject born in UK as a result of those times but of one US parent) I would think this is the kind of place you shoud be. A lot of our members are not like some of and there are long and serious philosophical discussions without the fireworks.
                          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                        • Posted by freedomforall 7 years, 8 months ago
                          Until then... what?
                          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                          • Posted by Rolf 7 years, 8 months ago
                            Until then I will believe that most people are ah*s, the society we now have sux, that I wasted 23 years of my life in service to my adopted country (but am still proud of the time I gave), that we, even on this site, will never be able to agree on anything and I'm gonna crawl back into my prepper hole and wait for the first person to tell me to my face that I can't live and vote the way the Constitution tells me I can. And that time is near (within the next 10 to 15). Been here for over 2 years and now, adios. I just can't take all the negativity anymore.
                            Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                            • Posted by $ 7 years, 8 months ago
                              Rolf, you do see that things are in dire straights. Good for you, as there is a very small percent that recognize that and also can figure out it is not just because the Dems or Reps are in office, as the 2 parties have specifically driven the herd into that mentality. The debate here is the same one you will see amongst most people who do not want to have to buy into the big 2, who have become so arrogant and secure in their power, they throw 2 bags of trash into the fray and tell us to "choose". There was no viable republican I could see in the primaries, and the Dems had nothing that was allowed. So we have this dilemma.
                              Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                            • Posted by freedomforall 7 years, 8 months ago
                              Its just campaign season brings out very different conclusions using what appears to be the same input. Please accept my apologies for ranting, Rolf. If you must leave to preserve your mental health, please come back after the election when the discussions will likely be more productive, less stressful, more mentally stimulating, and entertaining.
                              Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                        • Posted by $ 7 years, 8 months ago
                          Rolf, I agree with your view, having lived overseas, and seen some of the way the Swedes and English vote and think, we are not too far off the norm. The political machines have gone to work in all the countries, and that was one point AR was trying to make, the value of liberty and freedom has been manipulated and twisted in most countries in one way or another and the quality of leadership reflects that manipulation.The crap candidates are every where's, not just here. Freedoms point of Libertarians is valid, in that it is something people have got to consider, since the 2 crap parties are no longer viable. It is just a large majority refuse to give up on "The Party".
                          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                  • Posted by RanScott 7 years, 8 months ago
                    Conservatives don't have 4 years to wait for "the perfect Republican candidate." Up until the last week, Teump's campaign has been disorganized and off-message, but his three most recent speeches have been very well-received, and the addition of Bannon and Co. to the campaign has Democrats and the media concerned where they never were before. I consider that a good thing, because I personally cannot find a way to pull the lever for Hillary Clinton. She cannot and must not rule.
                    Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                    • Posted by freedomforall 7 years, 8 months ago
                      Conservatives have had good candidates (non-GOP, non-Dem) to choose for the past 30 years but they continue to drink the GOP kool-aide and waste their votes on statist looters. Trump is only different in that he has openly supported Democrat socialists in the past and supported gun controls..
                      Conservatives have been toadies for the statist party for 30 years and this election is no different. They are still being led aroung like sheep, sacrificing their principles to fear of Hillary.
                      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                      • Comment deleted.
                        • Posted by freedomforall 7 years, 8 months ago
                          I wasn't taking to you MA, so I answered using terms that the poster will understand. You want to change his language, go ahead. But don't expect others to do the same.
                          Again you repeat the same mistakes of the past 30 years, MA. Trump buys us nothing as he has consistently acted as a looter and statist.
                          Objectivism is the basis of my conclusions. Ignoring reality is not what objectivists do. The reality is that Trump is a statist. I do not support Trump. Hillary is a statist. I do not support Hillary.
                          Your argument is solely to choose a lesser evil. The past 30 years have proven that is a wrong choice. Trump is not better than the past poor GOP candidates.
                          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                    • Comment hidden by post owner or admin, or due to low comment or member score. View Comment
                    • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 7 years, 8 months ago
                      Agreed just wanted to drop off as point on that position and the point on the Democrats is well put. Klein will suck more support. The polls if iyou do the averages not the cherry picked best of the day are not as bad as they are made out to be by the lame streamers. The radical reasoners aside have their own little narrow agenda and they are so myopic and narrow minded thay can't see the woods for the trees but hey are a minority with a my way or the highway mentality. One track amateurs. Trump has two things going for him. The words getting out don't judge an outsider by insider rules using their foolish useless definitions and rhetoric. Just focus on the fact that Hillary is an accomplished chronic liar and no matter what she says it is meaningless. But what she has demonstrated so far is as you say she has to go. Nice call on the three speeches. They still sound like an outsider and the left can't handle being ignrored or ditching what they proclaim. So the responses are typically 'playing stupid.'
                      That will keep the humanoid in line. Less the Kliein subtraction. She's runing for the future seeing the same thing in the Socialist party as we see in the Republicans. There day is done.

                      The other response comes later but there is a lot of votes out there if he or even if Johnson wants to mine them .
                      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                  • Posted by $ 7 years, 8 months ago
                    Freedom, that may be true, it is just you have to factor in the fact that a large majority of the sheeple will never abandon "The Party". They will vote for the criminal or the RINO because they refuse to have to look at the reality of the situation, preferring their fantasy and sloganeering. Makes for a crappy situation all around.
                    Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                  • Comment deleted.
                    • Posted by jabuttrick 7 years, 8 months ago
                      MA: I'm curious. What is there in the Libertarian Platform which you consider "leftist"? Please be specific.
                      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                      • Comment hidden by post owner or admin, or due to low comment or member score. View Comment
                      • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 7 years, 8 months ago
                        I looked again and found my copy of the platform was something put out at the time of the convention and NOT the current copy although it did come from the Libetarian Partys website.

                        So please take this as an apology as the current version has much in the way of corrections and only a couple of minor non-sacred ground issues both of which I consider unimportant to the task at hand.

                        Having said that publicly and it's not the first time I've been in that position....

                        Part of the problem as I see it is the candidates themselves both political insiders and acting accordingly. Weld is a deal killer as i consider the choice of the potential President especially when selected by a vote of one the actual Presidential Candidate to be of primie importance.

                        But the comments of the two of them in various venues first rushing to support Hillary and hen the Second Amendment issue and similar instances of catrering to the left are very disappointing to say the least. I can't see them as Consitutional Centrists and Weld is a disaster in that respect.

                        What they say as opposed to the platform is unacceptable and in my mind makes them non viable. The opportunities they have passed up to broaden their voter base are a mystery.

                        So I'm going back to my own stance which is Defeat Hillary AND the Republican party as the two major objectives using any tool i can morally countenance to complete that mssion statement.

                        But iit is a good platform. Damn shame it deserves better than iit got in the way of candidates.

                        Any chance of 15% or being included in the debates anyway? .
                        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                        • Posted by jabuttrick 7 years, 8 months ago
                          MA: I'm glad you had a chance to review the Platform and have reconsidered your claim about it. As to the debates, the 15% threshold seems out of reach. Although a handful of states currently have Johnson above that level (most significantly Colorado) it is only the national polls that count and Johnson is around 10% there. With only about 3 weeks left until the debaters are chosen, it seems highly unlikely that the 15% mark will be surpassed. The only hope would be if Trump demands that Johnson and Klein be included or he will boycott. That would throw the whole process into turmoil and the result is unpredictable. It would put Clinton in a predicament. But I doubt that will happen. Given the hundreds of millions still to be spent by Socialist Hillary and Benito Trump and the power of the "wasted vote" mantra, I still think it will be a minor miracle for Johnson to get 5% and Klein 2% on election day.
                          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                          • Comment hidden by post owner or admin, or due to low comment or member score. View Comment
                          • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 7 years, 8 months ago
                            Never know there is still the lure of a Coalition deal which to be blunt would include Johnson and not Weld though something could be found. With some proper advertising there is the magic of getting someone in the Lib Party into a position of national exposure as a Cabinet Secretary I would think Interior. Get a couple of main points included in the sacred ground and be another 'adviser' to the outsider. Nowhere to go but up from this point. Coaliton you see is not a party but a group of parties with like beliefs on the important issues. Five percent to offer with a way of getting more..and then there is that 46% of the eligible voters pool. Hillary having nothing to counter cause Klein sucked them up. and if you look at the average of the polls not the selected best of the day she is not that far ahead.

                            Worth a try and the Debate issue could well be the introduction. "Since Hillary is denying the other two candidates the right to debate I've decided to include at least the Libertarian Candidate and besides we agree on a lot of major points and can set the minor one's aside." Since the Republicans heretofore have abandoned half the electorate ....I shall incude them.?"

                            Turn it in maybe you'll make history and four years later .... Johnson is a household name.

                            That is how much be advised of the real platform not the one I formerly read meant it's quite good. Johnson is gets pulled away from the left And it gets you well over 15% for the next go round on your own. Most of all iit cuts the bitches throat.

                            You know think objectively use any tool you can to get where you need to be. and at worst create a rallying point with some legs and purpose.
                            Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                    • Posted by freedomforall 7 years, 8 months ago
                      I couldn't disagree more about Johnson and libertarians being leftists, MA. You lose all credibility by repeating that unsuppportable conclusion.
                      You are buying in to the same tired, failed-for-30-years, lesser evil rubbish. In Trump's case, its even worse since his background is a history of donating to leftist politicians, supporting gun controls, and using imminent domain to steal from honest people. Nothing you have said rebuts Trump's history of looting and fascist actions.
                      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                      • Comment deleted.
                        • Posted by freedomforall 7 years, 8 months ago
                          My objective is more liberty, freer markets, much smaller government. Neither Trump nor Hillary achieve my goals. Defeating Hillary is just another lesser-evil rubbish goal. The details of Trump's actions have been posted here in the Gulch repeatedly and those articles (regardless of their source) have not been refuted publicly by Trump, his campaign, or the GOP. Trump has danced around the topics while never refuting them and not promising anything to the contrary. Just another double-talking politician with a history of complicity with leftists.
                          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                      • Comment deleted.
                        • Posted by freedomforall 7 years, 8 months ago
                          What specifically do you take issue with in the Libertarian platform?
                          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                          • Comment deleted.
                            • Posted by freedomforall 7 years, 8 months ago
                              We disagree on Trump. Read through past postings here on trump which provide references to his support for gun control, his actions using eminent domain to take property for his own advantage from an unwilling owner, and his contributions to leftist candidates. They have been posted several times and are not leftist propaganda, but truth.
                              Your goal appears to be "Defeat Hillary." I have heard that fear rubbish from the GOP for decades and using it as a goal does not achieve anything but a bigger state, less liberty and market manipulation.
                              That solution does not fly and it never did. (I do not mean to imply that your intentions are the same as the GOP.)
                              No more lesser evil rubbish.
                              Finally, I avoid using the phrase "I know" unless I originated the data. "I think" is more accurate when I am making a judgement based on data I did not observe myself.
                              Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                        • Posted by freedomforall 7 years, 8 months ago
                          I have seen the platform and some of the speeches.
                          Have you observed the results of the past 30 years of lesser evil support? Do you make decisions based on promises or actions?
                          You ask questions assuming certain results from a Trump victory that have no support in Trump's past actions.
                          I think Trump will do none of the positive things that Trump wants you to believe. His actions in the past are evidence against him.
                          You have decided to support the person you believe is a lesser evil based on his speeches, but with no basis in his actions.
                          That is the same error that GOP voters have made for 30 years. Ignoring reality will not improve reality.
                          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by galentol 7 years, 8 months ago
    Ellsworth Toohey a weak character? It doesn't take much to influence weak people. Look what's coming out of the colleges today and look who's teaching them a lot of EMT rot.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden by post owner or admin, or due to low comment or member score. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 7 years, 8 months ago
    The stuff in the article is just the tip of the cashberg. Moveon.org and several others, The entire secular progressive movement is Soros just about anywhere you see anything anti Constitution with a bought and paid for Judge making a one man or woman decision (remember same sex?) , the ACLU all Soros.

    Interesting question is how he survived WWII and immediately went from his native country to the prestigous London School of Economics.

    Question Two is Did you really mean what you publicly said about turning the USA into a sociaist autocracy?

    Apparently so he's doing it.

    Still want to vote for Hillary or against he opponent.

    Well think of it this way. Voting For Trump is not voting Republican. Trumps an outsider. Voting for Hillary is voting for Comrade Soros.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by Temlakos 7 years, 8 months ago
    George Soros, if Rand had thought about him, would have been the perfect Ellsworth Monckton Toohey analogue in Atlas Shrugged. Rand created some of the weakest villains in all of literature. She would have done better to create a George Soros.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo