Extreme Vetting as I read the article refers not extreme methods of vetting but discerning extreme viewpoints and beliefs of the applicant for immigration privileges. Reading the comments in the original article the most common centered around the transistion of belief from religious law trumping all else to constitutional law trumping all else to or from the latter to the actions of Obama and probable actions of Hillary using Executive Law as a dictator. - for that matter a single Judge in a lower court overturning the Constitution.

I would be in favor of not only heavily vetting the Islamic applicant for immigration privileges if nor nothing else their cultural background and heavily barbaric responses are unacceptable.

I'm also in favor of reigning in both Presidents and rogue Judges before allowing them to be elected or appointed and in the case of the latter allowing recall which exists for Presidents and Vice Presidents should in the Succession amendments so why not other senior members of the government.

On the whole a sound idea needing implementation showing solid thinking. '

As one commenter in the original article put it the Democrats should have vetted their own candidates for rogue candidates like Hillary and instructed their right wing of the left wing of the Government Party to do the same. But the cat is out to the bag and the ultimate outsider is in the political hen house. All for the better.