

- Navigation
- Hot
- New
- Recent Comments
- Activity Feed
- Marketplace
- Members Directory
- Producer's Lounge
- Producer's Vault
- The Gulch: Live! (New)
- Ask the Gulch!
- Going Galt
- Books
- Business
- Classifieds
- Culture
- Economics
- Education
- Entertainment
- Government
- History
- Humor
- Legislation
- Movies
- News
- Philosophy
- Pics
- Politics
- Science
- Technology
- Video
- The Gulch: Best of
- The Gulch: Bugs
- The Gulch: Feature Requests
- The Gulch: Featured Producers
- The Gulch: General
- The Gulch: Introductions
- The Gulch: Local
- The Gulch: Promotions
Previous comments... You are currently on page 12.
K
Regarding the oath, we will agree to disagree on whether a Christian will be able to take Galt's oath. It could be reasonably argued that a Christian didn't ask Jesus to live his life for us, but a Christian who takes his/her faith seriously should be living their lives for Jesus.
as you may recall, we have been of different opinion on a few things in the past, but I muat acknowledge your well thought out and written commentary above. On the other hand, i must also differ with you on the opinion that Brat or any other christian can be an objectivist and still believe in God. as to his ability to take the "Galt Oath," as a believer, you couldn't be more wrong.
Ms. Rand's atheism was based more on her growing up in Russia than on any real disagreement with Christianity. I don't doubt that she refused to believe in a God, yet her moral principles are in fact in line with christian beliefs.
Fred Speckmann
commonsenseforamericans@yahoo.com
Bravo for your analysis of the election results and your religious beliefs. In my opinion, too many gulchers seem to be at the least agnostic if not actually Atheists. As you stated about the wonders you have witnessed that science can't explain.
Fred Speckmann
commonsenseforamericans@yahoo.com
Thank you for the reminder, however even an ignorant old man like me knows that ARI represents the Ayn Rand Institute. It does beg the question however if you truly understand the meaning of the Ayn Rand philosophy. There are many on this site that do understand, but I am amazed at the number that don't seem to have a clue.
Fred Speckmann
commonsenseforamericans@yahoo.com
Whatever Brat's politics and improvement over Cantor, no one should be excited about Brat being an advocate of Ayn Rand's philosophy. Despite the reports claiming he loves Ayn Rand, etc., there has been no supporting evidence for that, only that he likes Atlas Shrugged and has been "influenced" by it in politics, that he "appreciates" her "case" for human freedom and markets, and that he is in deep with religion and has also been influenced by the likes of Calvin and Niebuhr.
He may be "appreciating" Ayn Rand's arguments only enough to get BT&T money used primarily to promote his religion as the alleged moral foundation of everything while only liking a few of Ayn Rand's formulations at the level of politics, which does more harm than good if that's what he is doing.
Until we see the one article he co-authored on Ayn Rand's moral philosophy we don't know explicitly what his position on it is or if he understands it at all. If someone finds a link to it, please post it on gg. Meanwhile be glad that Cantor is gone and watch your back.
The "needs", "economic justice", and "opportunities" are addressed by "responsibilities as citizens in a free society". To me that last phrase states folks are responsible for their own lives and the choices they make in pursuing their own needs, etc. I, nor the government via my taxes, are responsible for their poor choices.
For myself, I have no problem with his beliefs as stated. To me they are clear.
- John W. Campbell, "Hyperdemocracy"
http://www.xtimports.com/text/Hyperdemoc...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1E9pKU_N...
:)
Or did you mean, "dress up like period American aborigines"?
Who's buried in Ayn Rand's grave?
And doesn't it put the other students off?
http://reason.com/24-7/2014/06/11/dave-b...
Brat has some different foundational principles than you do. I have seen several people here in the Gulch who share many Objectivist values other than atheism and yet remain Christian. As long as such Christians realize the burden of lordship that Christianity entails to go along with the questionable prospect of an eternal heavenly reward, people like Brat can have much in common with Objectivists and can live non-contradictory lifestyles. However, as I have said before, they cannot take Galt's oath.
Christians have one fundamentally different premise than Objectivists. Many of those who participate here in Galt's Gulch have checked such premises and are quite comfortable with the one fundamentally different premise that Objectivists do not share.
The battle will have to be waged on many fronts. I am in Florida at a non-tenure-granting engineering university in what many would consider a position of prestige and in a job I work quite hard at, but I still consider it a shrug job because I could have founded multiple companies or been a few levels below a Robert Stadler had I been willing to continue accepting the government gravy train.
I will battle from here during the academic year but want to start building a real Atlantis during the remainder of the time. I consider the shrug jobs we are in the battle positions, but we all need a vacation periodically.
I've read many of your posts in the Gulch, and I agree with much of what you write. I also respect your knowledge and appreciate your efforts regarding a real Gulch, but I think that battle will need to be waged from multiple locations rather than one. ;)
Load more comments...