

- Navigation
- Hot
- New
- Recent Comments
- Activity Feed
- Marketplace
- Members Directory
- Producer's Lounge
- Producer's Vault
- The Gulch: Live! (New)
- Ask the Gulch!
- Going Galt
- Books
- Business
- Classifieds
- Culture
- Economics
- Education
- Entertainment
- Government
- History
- Humor
- Legislation
- Movies
- News
- Philosophy
- Pics
- Politics
- Science
- Technology
- Video
- The Gulch: Best of
- The Gulch: Bugs
- The Gulch: Feature Requests
- The Gulch: Featured Producers
- The Gulch: General
- The Gulch: Introductions
- The Gulch: Local
- The Gulch: Promotions
Previous comments... You are currently on page 10.
again,I do not agree with either of these individuals on many issues. However, both are astute and respectful of Ayn Rand and Objectivism. carry on :)
But personally, if you feel that they are and wish to identify with objectivism and still hold religious beliefs, then I say go for it.
If you consider Ayn Rand as someone who taught you something important, don't let anyone tell you otherwise. It does not matter whether that is your pastor or somebody on this forum. I encourage you to keep trying to figure this out for yourself!
There is a difference between a philosophy and a cult. Rand said accept everything she said or take none of it. That came from years of her personal study, you can't be expected to come to the same conclusion with that same conviction overnight (if you ever do). If you can reconcile the two world views then good for you. If not, and you face a contradiction, you will have to deal with it personally! Good Luck!