The Source of Hate According To The News Is God. What is this?

Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 10 years, 2 months ago to Humor
41 comments | Share | Flag

One reporters article headline stated God hates the shedding of innocent blood and there fore is anti-abortion or was it pro life...

Stay focused on the headline. I thought about it and came up with the following

The Headline stated God Hates.

The article therefore was an inferred that God was the source of Hate. Kinda hinted around that it wasn't just the Christian God but a bunch of others involved and proposed to break the story.

Anyway withoug belaboring or debating the issue of abortion focus on the words God Hates.

1. Does God really hate and do hate speech.? What happened to 'loves the little children of the world.'

2. In fact did God Iby any other name) really indicate tht in some way or were the article writer and the editor putting words in God's mouth. S

3. A step further given the passions the topic causes and the spin off possibilities and the physical violence I would say it was somewhere in the realm of inciting violence.

4. However hatespeech is illegal thanks primarily to politicians in my estimation so what will the authorities do about this article. Shouldn't the writer and editor be arrested, tried, convicted and punished?

5. Why stop there? The headline specifically charges that God Hates. Will God be indicted? After All His/Her name is not Hillary.

6. Whee's the FBI when you really need them and old Judge Loretta Lynch and the pundits and spin Doctors?

7. My mind raced through possibilities. Was this really God as claimed or the Devil or James Carville? Hey its a Demo-ncratic Convention sort of a secular con-vacation right?

8. And where was God in all of this? Does God really hate? If so - and it takes a lot of energy to hate juut as smiling takes less facial muscles than frowns - it must be important but what is God doing about this? Here we have reporters, reporters, Reporters! - not even journalists - running all over town inciting riots and possibly flat out lying. about God maybe even having Him arrested? What does that suggest.

9. The easy out is we don't have the need to know what God is thinking. It's classified. How did the article get to the newspaper or blog? E-Mail? Is God and the media using unauthorized servers to transmit classified information? Let's skip that one as Susan Estrogen used to say it's old news let's move on.

10. All right then what? Is God unable to deliver as promised? All it takes is one zap from a heavenly finger and those reporters would be crispy critters or treated to a lobotomy. or turned into angels or given jobs on the other side of fly over country. Is God impotent in this affair.

11. We'll call it God Gate. Are there side deals with Iran? Is He holding T Bills and is to big to fail?

12. How does Putin and that Turk fit in to all this. fit in to all of this? Great! Just Great now it's gone Terra Viral. Dragged tghe islamics in on it and you know how they are and Putin a lifelong practicioner of denying Dieties other than Lenin.

13. I remember when these reporters were set up with mud slinging and bimbo stories Now it's WWIII the really big one!

14. And at a DNC gathering? I know they h**te religion Are they going to pin this one on Reagan?

What did the article actually say? I don't know. it may have been ugly but it sure wasn't pretty. Politics has really sunk to a new low and conventions become major boring when reporters pull this kinda stuff.

Join us now as we return to days of yester year with Solo Scriber and his wonder horse Type Setter. ........Hi Ho! Away!

Ding Dongs! Where you going?

Venezuela?

Whose going to clean up all this mess?

OMG the foreign press is here. Hillary is that job in Montana still open?

Seriously it struck me that phrasing 'God Hates' was just a smidgen over the line.

It really must be boring in Philadelphia.

Please order in English.



SOURCE URL: http://townhall.com/columnists/michaelbrown/2016/07/27/since-god-hates-the-shedding-of-innocent-blood-can-a-christian-vote-for-hillary-n2198507?newsletterad=


Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by Herb7734 10 years, 1 month ago
    God neither hates nor loves seeing as God doesn't exist, or if he/she/it does exist, he/she/it is pretty indifferent. But God is a wonderful symbol in which to dump the vagaries of humanity. Believers say just stick it out and you'll be rewarded. Of course, you'll need to die to get the reward. Hello radical Muslim extremists. I posted a religious topic a month or so ago and the postings went on and on and on. Surprised the hell out of me. Let's face it folks, blaming a ghost is a good way to excuse anything.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by Riftsrunner 10 years, 2 months ago
    The first line of the reference article is blatantly incorrect. I would propose that the article writer hasn't read his bible very well, as God has instructed the Hebrews on various occasions to commit genocide with specific instruction to kill the children of another group of people (even to the point of cutting the unborn from their mother's wombs). So where has God shown any hatred toward shedding innocent blood, especially children. In fact, I believes that God loves the smell of blood, especially that spilled in his honor. So because the premise of the article starts from an incorrect position, so why should anyone take what's written further as any better? Hillary Clinton has much better flaws to present that make her a bad candidate for president than her stance on abortion.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by Herb7734 10 years, 1 month ago
      The old testament God is a mean, petulant downright nasty creep. But then, that was the outlook on deities thousands of years ago. Especially an invisible God whose idol wasn't around to break.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Comment hidden by post owner or admin, or due to low comment or member score. View Comment
      • Posted by $ 10 years, 1 month ago
        It was a veryi practical way to bring a mob of people under control. Probably still is. Temujin has the sky God who hung out over the top of the mountains over the Altai -Mongolia region. Having seen the consequences of letting religion and untrustworthy acolytes mixed with government he flat out said worship who and what you want but do not cross the line in to politics or you die on the spot. The old swat a fly theory came from that enlightened attitude. For the same reasons one of his sons took the time ont he mission of pacifying the middle east and SE Europe to knock out and kill off the entire population of he five or six Assassins strong holds.The Jihadis of thei rday.

        Every one got one chance and that was it. If they refused the entire city and surrounding areas was killed off. I reckon today if yiou started in Washington DC it would take as far as Richmond and Baltimore to control as far as Seattle and LA. and Brownsville. With a few reminders along the way. Harsh but it works. Mollycoddling people who don't give a damn or are too drugged up to notice accomploishes nothing. Come to think of it . Portland, Salem, and Eugene may have to serve as west coast flys. SF and Seattle for sure. I'm speaking metaphorically of course. At the right we are going in a one party autocracy which already speaks of retraining camps how long and how many examples until your neighbors toed the line...and turned you in?
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by $ Olduglycarl 10 years, 1 month ago
          The bottom line: The Subconscious voice of Conscience is the consequence a conscious human faces...causing one to inspect one's own behavior and adjusting where needed, ( this is a self ruled individual ); whereas a man with no voice or one that rejects that voice is not aware of the consequences of his actions or thoughts and will always blame everything outside himself for his troubles.
          That my friend is the difference between Us and Them.
          The only true division in society IS: "The haves and the Have nots."Those that have a conscience and those that have not.

          Did that come through a reading of my first book...have you read it yet?
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by $ Olduglycarl 10 years, 1 month ago
        Note: up until Abraham the concept of one god that created creation was not a thought in their brains.
        Their God was a variety of things and or their rulers, which I might add, were not human in the same sense as we...they were most probably the Nephilim or their descendants. These creature existed prior to the time when mankind came upon the seen, after establishing a language we soon heard a voice in our heads. They were not aware enough to realize it was their own voice and therefore attributed that voice to some kind of god speaking to them. Mankind was not able to introspect his own behavior until about 3000 years ago and to this day...many have still not made this step in our evolution.

        Folks here need to understand this and the fact that some have a sense of this but have been taught to express it in the bicameral way. So even though you might be embarrassed, as I once was, can now appreciate the evolution of our thoughts, our brains and our minds...(some of us that is).
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by Herb7734 10 years, 1 month ago
          I don't think that you could call Yaweh human. If I were an apologist for religion, I would say that he took human form so that humans could comprehend him.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
          • Posted by $ Olduglycarl 10 years, 1 month ago
            That's a whole different story. Laughing

            The Nephilim were the Giants...9/10' tall, old men of renown...not at all like us...just look at the representations of them in Egypt.
            Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Comment hidden by post owner or admin, or due to low comment or member score. View Comment
    • Posted by $ 10 years, 2 months ago
      I didn't read it at all as far as this post was concerned and the original Article writer is a reporter which explains his actions or lack thereof.

      I thought it a comment on the times that such a headline on it's own never mind the substance or lack of that followed , was instructive in understandng the context of our times used to judge history and ourselves.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by Riftsrunner 10 years, 2 months ago
        I know, I kind of jumped ship. I just have been spending time watching and commenting on Feminist videos and was both in and out (as in burned out on the asinine arguments third wave feminists make) of an argumentative mood. So I took the opportunity to get onto another subject, relieve some of my frustration, clear my head, and get out of that mood.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Comment hidden by post owner or admin, or due to low comment or member score. View Comment
        • Posted by $ 10 years, 1 month ago
          What is a third wave feminest? What wave were the one's that helped Hillary get Bill re elected while turning on their sisters. What wave are the ones helping Bill get Hillary elected while he continuous to churn on their sisters?
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
          • Posted by Riftsrunner 10 years, 1 month ago
            A third wave feminist is what you get when the feminism of the 60's-80's meets the millennial movement. So you have people who make claims that the patriarchy is to blame for all the evils in the world and when you call them on the bull crap, they go scurrying to the safe spaces and claim you are victimizing them. They claim that women are treated like meat because they get catcalls while walking down the street, but to protest will go on 'slut walks' and wear just their underwear or less (this also is in protest that we live in a rape culture, but they seem to give the actual rape cultures, like the Islamic world, a pass). They also like to infiltrate forums and claim they are misogynistic. For example, Anita Sarkesian, claimed she was a gamer since a child, but was revealed to have lied, in order to make a video series on how video games are inherently sexist and train young men to be mysogynists and she started to get traction in the game developer areas. And when she got a little pushback saying she was wrong, she claimed she was being harassed. She has gone to the UN to try to get online critism of her and her cohorts banned. And recently, she joined the Twitter Trust and Safety board, which has many free speech advocates worried.
            Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
            • Comment hidden by post owner or admin, or due to low comment or member score. View Comment
            • Posted by $ 10 years, 1 month ago
              Same song different verse and once again the women's movement proves the founders were correct Thanks to the gender traitors you just described and their predecessors like baby killer Margaret Sanger and mass murderer Rachel Carson.

              I was surprised not to see Slater Kinney on the celebrity performance list until I realized they probably made the 'too old for Bill' list. I predicted that thanks to those types we would have to drag the women's movement into equality kicking and screaming when the special treatment vis a vis the draft first came up. I see the military is once again albeit under pressure leading cultural change and doing exactly that and demanding they get ttreated equally or lose their government jobs and student loan privileges.

              I realize they are not a majority which also means Hillary is not holding the Woman Card. - Just the opposite. Bill maybe but not Hillary. Difference between Hillary and Heidi? Heidi is prettier and Hillary hasn't been convicted
              Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by JohnConnor352 10 years, 1 month ago
    If He created everything, then yes. He is the source of hate.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Comment hidden by post owner or admin, or due to low comment or member score. View Comment
    • Posted by $ 10 years, 1 month ago
      Now we are back on track. Like what is left when there nothing there is the space that everything occupied so there is something but if the space is removed then ......there is nothing truly and therefore the Big Bang cannot recycle.

      Here we go . If God is the creator of everything then he created hate and love, like and dislike, trust and mistrust OR did he just create minds that could pose such questions AND if so WHY and to What purpose.


      or

      Is our set of Gods only for this universe and others are fro the one's that went before or will come after then there can never be a complete absence of everything or God will not be created...

      This form of debate or arguing is called what?

      A dead end

      Stupid and Useless

      It serves to illustrate extreme and possibilities

      #4 etc. You got it. including the real answer

      which could be put this in it's own thread and
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by JohnConnor352 10 years, 1 month ago
        I'm sorry Michael, but I had a really difficult time following that. Stream of consciousness doesn't always translate into the written word without fastidious grammar and punctuation.

        I did get the point that arguing about God is pointless. That is because he is a pure fabrication, and so can be molded into any shape for any purpose. You can never win an argument about fiction, especially one that isn't written down. For instance, one can be correct or incorrect about the mineral that weakens Superman... But one cannot be correct or incorrect about which of His children God loves the most...
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Comment hidden by post owner or admin, or due to low comment or member score. View Comment
        • Posted by $ 10 years, 1 month ago
          All unless the God is a choosy sort.

          Sometimes I write what I can to sort of lay out the idea thinking the thin spots will invite comment Sort of like can't see wood for the trees much less which one you need fo rheat and which for fine cabinetry. So? That's where you and others come in . JohnPE is adept at that sort of thing once in a while we do a colique or coliquy a two way conversation and it gets deep and hilarious at the same time I'm sure others wonde what were going on about. But for any particular part just point out and I'll have at it again with any comments on what you thought i wanted so I can check it against what I did want to say or write.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by ProfChuck 10 years, 2 months ago
    God and government are in direct competition and both hate competition. Interesting conflict between fictitious and fraudulent entities. It is a battle of titans worthy of Greek or Shakespearean drama. It's hard to say who will emerge victorious but one thing is for sure, the people will loose.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by Herb7734 10 years, 1 month ago
      Titans, schmitans. Rand had it right when she said that there were two evil symbols alive in humanity. The mystic(religion) and the Hun.(Powermonger).When these two combined forces they are the consummate evil. They become the Devil, the demons, the witches and warlocks of the human race. Observe a religion that is a military, none other than our old pal, Islam.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Olduglycarl 10 years, 2 months ago
    Hate requires physical animosity to be hate as opposed to a simple dislike...the definition or at least it's connotation, I suggest, has been hijacked.

    But to the point your making...I don't think the pagan mystical humanization of the natural and physical laws and processes that has made existence, in particular Our existence, possible is capable of Hate Or a simple dislike.

    Could it be that there are actually creatures on this planet that really think the "personal" consequences of abortion comes from outside themselves?
    Blaming creation or the cosmos for one's choice to abort a child, to do the abortion or to encourage such a practice is like blaming the sun for your red skin, blaming the moon for keeping you up at night.

    Seems to me that the one's getting and committing these abortions are committing an act of hate.

    Thoughtlessness like this article's supposition and head line is surely not going to help Me or others in our efforts to elevate the "Religious" conversation into a conscious state explaining what bicameral man had mystified into a "guy in the sky".

    At this rate...mankind is never going to be allowed to grow up.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by LarryHeart 10 years, 1 month ago
    All of you are commenting from ignorance. Not that you are ignoramuses but you are basing your thesis of "god's" non existence or genocide or all the other reverse anthropomorphism (defining the transcendent according to humans) on a translation into Greek that is filtered through Greek mythology .Mythology that was invented to give legitimacy to the elites authority and power to rule. The 'Divine' right.
    Unless you can decipher the meaning of the words of Moses by understanding Hebrew you are misinformed and merely gossiping about gossip and hearsay.

    FYI Moses never spoke of GOD. Moses spoke of intelligence. An intelligent universe ( the forces of nature) Elohim from which all intelligence arises and of Existence/Being in which our Universe is sheltered.

    There was no worship only service.. there were no sacrifices only offerings that brought closeness between people and the transcendent intelligence and acknowledgement and elevation of animals and plant life which we eat as food to produce good in our world.

    The word for service, slavery and work in Hebrew is the same - Avodah. Moses warned not to be seduced into belief and service to false images and anything that can be corrupt (Idol - Pesel - means invalid/corrupted in Hebrew)

    All Government systems are Religions and like religions have the capacity to be used to enslave rather than allow service to humanity and connection with the intelligence that unites all of us.

    There are no 10 commandments only 10 utterances/things/realities. Davar in Hebrew. The phrase translated as 'which I commanded" means "which I put in order for you" to order, not a a command but rather as in making order out of disarray. Work with the 10 things and you will have a good society.. One of the realities uttered does not mean "there shall be no other gods before me". rather, Don't be in service to human 'powers' e.g. Kings, Emperors and governments.or worship and fear a force of nature or subscribe to all invalid ideologies (images in the mind) created by humans to lord over other humans.

    There is much more. So be careful, you are bandying about the result of thousands of years of misinterpretation and misunderstanding.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by term2 10 years, 2 months ago
    The biggest evils in the world have been done in the name of GOD actually. If indeed there even IS one, which I seriously doubt.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by DrZarkov99 10 years, 2 months ago
      Stalin, Pol Pot, and Mao might be counterpoints to your argument, since all were atheists who collectively slaughtered over 100 million. Rachel Carson, by successfully getting DDT banned, was the driving element behind about 100 million deaths from malaria (so far, with 2 million more each year), which she did in the name of Mother Earth (nature as a substitute for deity). Hitler used religion as a cover, and was at best a pagan, but then he was a piker, with the war he started killing "only" 20 million. British bureaucrats' indifference to the starvation of 5 million Irish and 30 million natives of India didn't invoke deity, but racial inferiority according to Darwin (though Darwin never claimed any race was superior to any other). Secular believers can be quite brutal, without God's help.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by term2 10 years, 1 month ago
        good points actually. I just dont like the arrogance of religious zealots I guess.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by DrZarkov99 10 years, 1 month ago
          Having been kicked out of the Baptist church at 12 years old for questioning some extremist positions, I share your dislike for religious zealotry. The fact remains that humans can be horrifyingly cruel and indifferent to the suffering of others without any religious justification.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
          • Posted by term2 10 years, 1 month ago
            That is true. Look no further than Nazi Germany for proof of that. Even in present day Venezuela, Maduro is more concerned with his own power than any suffering of the people that live there. And then there is Hillary, who is totally into power at anyone's expense.
            Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo