

- Navigation
- Hot
- New
- Recent Comments
- Activity Feed
- Marketplace
- Members Directory
- Producer's Lounge
- Producer's Vault
- The Gulch: Live! (New)
- Ask the Gulch!
- Going Galt
- Books
- Business
- Classifieds
- Culture
- Economics
- Education
- Entertainment
- Government
- History
- Humor
- Legislation
- Movies
- News
- Philosophy
- Pics
- Politics
- Science
- Technology
- Video
- The Gulch: Best of
- The Gulch: Bugs
- The Gulch: Feature Requests
- The Gulch: Featured Producers
- The Gulch: General
- The Gulch: Introductions
- The Gulch: Local
- The Gulch: Promotions
Previous comments... You are currently on page 2.
1. Control immigration
2. Require immigrants to become "American"
3. Eliminate the social safety net so that people don't have enough money to live on and sit around brooding. They will have to socialize sufficiently to get a job, the job will keep them busy enough so they don't have time to sit around and brood.
4. Stop the Democrats form using "identity Politics" to keep groups separate and distinct and feeling discriminated against. [this will be harder than eliminating the social safety net!]
But how would you get data? -
Yes a high proportion of violence offenders use violent games, but what is the proportion of violent game users that actually commit violence? Anything that has many 15 to 25 yo male users would score high.
I understand that violent PC games are very popular in Japan but terror acts are low;
ok there was a mass stabbing the other day, but the numbers are still low.
The real anti social behaviour is ignored and even applauded. the message is violence solves everything and death is just another reset button.
They don't have huge organizations with the stated purpose of destroying the non-gaming community.
No need for a sorry.
I can't stand video games, but insisting we let an algorithm look over players' shoulders for anti-social behavior seems wrong. It's too close to insisting we look through everyone's private papers without a warrant. We live in this world where we have more data than ever and tools to analyze. It understand the temptation in the article, but requiring approval for engaging in a form of narrative is close to requiring approval for unpopular speech.