

- Navigation
- Hot
- New
- Recent Comments
- Activity Feed
- Marketplace
- Members Directory
- Producer's Lounge
- Producer's Vault
- The Gulch: Live! (New)
- Ask the Gulch!
- Going Galt
- Books
- Business
- Classifieds
- Culture
- Economics
- Education
- Entertainment
- Government
- History
- Humor
- Legislation
- Movies
- News
- Philosophy
- Pics
- Politics
- Science
- Technology
- Video
- The Gulch: Best of
- The Gulch: Bugs
- The Gulch: Feature Requests
- The Gulch: Featured Producers
- The Gulch: General
- The Gulch: Introductions
- The Gulch: Local
- The Gulch: Promotions
Previous comments... You are currently on page 2.
Yes. At 4:48 she mentions alleged conservatives. This clearly suggests to me there is other type of conservative who she thinks do not make these bad arguments for capitalism.
I reject statism regardless of what camp it comes from. Though I believe men are quite fallible, I would not use that to justify capitalism. Capitalism is best because it is moral. If one considers themselves a conservative and defends the old practices because it is the best system, not because it is old, perhaps they are not conservatives by Rand's general definition. It is a fine distinction, but I think some self proclaimed conservatives of today do so. Time frame- 8:53 Rand: "Such, unfortunately, are a great many of today's conservatives." From this quote I infer that Rand would acknowledge that "some" are exceptions. Certainly many others still fit Rand's general definition/characterization and are no better than the progressives that reject the old simply because it is old. They believe change/progress can only come by rejecting the old, which is to reject the intellect of our founders and their accomplishments.
Compromise on principle is evil. "There are two sides to every issue: one side is right and the other is wrong, but the middle is always evil." Galt's speech.
Regards,
O.A.
Points up why I dislike both political sides.