Obama Is Too Incompetent To Pull Off A Coup Kurt Schlichter but for the US Military it would be a business as usual Counter Revolution, Legal, and Required.

Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 7 years, 9 months ago to Government
20 comments | Share | Flag


Obama Is Too Incompetent To Pull Off A Coup
Kurt Schlichter

Turkey’s failed coup, combined with the disastrous disunity and polarization in the United States thanks to Barack Obama, have gotten people talking about whether it could happen here. For example, part-time law professor and full-time Instapundit Glenn Reynold has recently taken some serious looks at the issue of coups within the context of the American system of checks and balances. So what if next January Obama and his barely post-puberty band of juice box screw-ups in the West Wing decide they don’t want to leave? And the issue is even more pressing with Donald Trump sneaking up in the polls – Nate Silver gives him a 34% chance of winning, which is up from the approximately 0% chance a whole bunch of people gave him a year ago, your author included. If a couple more disgruntled cop haters with totally obvious unknown motives and a few more [OMITTED] radicals go on kill sprees, Trump might well be our next president.

So, could Barack Obama pull off a coup to keep himself in power rather than turn over the keys to the Oval Office?

Of course not. At the outset, what makes you think he would suddenly become competent enough to pull off that kind of sophisticated scheme, especially with him leading from behind the wheel of the Ivy League clown car that is his administration? These twits can’t even beat a bunch of Bedouin banditos sitting out in the open in the middle of a desert. But it never pays to rely solely on the incompetence of your opponents, so let’s run through a scenario and see how it plays out.
CARTOONS | Lisa Benson
View Cartoon

Donald Trump gets elected, snatching Pennsylvania, Ohio, and Michigan from Hillary when the people liberals have spent the last half-century dumping on get mad and vote. Gracious as always, Trump’s victory speech promises that Attorney General Chris Christie’s first job will be to investigate and prosecute Pantsuit von Pervenabler and President Faily McWorsethanCarter.

That gets Obama’s attention faster than a delicious doggie at dinner time. His post-presidency plans involve sucking up the residual adulation of the idiots who love him; they don’t involve dodging subpoenas and maybe even indictments. Hillary, after she sobers up, calls him and shrieks that he has to do something. Obama quickly says, “Valerie, it’s for you” and hands over the phone, but it’s quite clear – this whole peaceful transition of power thing just can’t happen. Plus, he tells himself, the rule of law is racist anyway. And so the coup plotting begins.

Now, a coup is generally a small group of people quickly seizing power, often bloodlessly. This is in contrast to a civil war, which is usually neither quick nor bloodless. In the American system, it would likely mean one part of the government (here, the executive) moving to essentially unmoor itself from the checks and balances of the other branches. In other words, it would be Obama doing what he has tried to do for the last eight years, except with guns.

So, how does one pull off a coup in the United States? It’s actually harder than it appears. A coup by definition is covert – you have to try and keep the active force as small as possible to maintain secrecy yet still have enough assets to do the job. The problem for Obama is that a significant portion of the most important element, the military, has nothing but contempt for him.

That does not include the military’s senior leadership. The sorry spectacle of senior officers slavishly going along with troop-imperiling idiocy like transsexual integration instead of throwing their stars on the table and walking out is a disgrace. So a significant number of generals would be intimidated into doing whatever Obama asks – if they can’t tell him that “No, America’s greatest strategic challenge is not slightly warmer weather,” then they haven’t the intestinal fortitude to tell him “No, I’m not putting a mech battalion on Capitol Hill.”

The next challenge is to get the troops to actually do it. “Wait, colonel” says Captain Smith of Rapid City, South Dakota. “You want me to take my infantry company into Washington? And maybe shoot American citizens? Sir, did you start at the O club a little early today?”

Assume the good captain passes that manifestly unlawful order to his troops (My own captains would have assumed that I had stuck my head and politely dragged me away to get an MRI). So, then Sergeant First Class Jones and most of the rest of the company NCOs would report that some unexplained maintenance problem had rendered most of the unit’s vehicles deadlined. “Oh well, sir,” he’d say, shrugging. The military runs on NCO power; when they stop playing, you don’t have an army anymore. You have a bunch of government employees sitting around dressed like shrubs.

But assume the military does act. What’s it do? How about seize the prime media outlets? Well, there would be no need to seize many of them– the New York Times and the alphabet networks would cheerlead a coup. But the others? Which of the thousands of radio and TV stations would they grab? And how about the internet – where do the soldiers go to take over the internet? Mark Zuckerberg’s hacienda?

And there’s another problem – Texas, plus a bunch of other states with administrations that still have an affinity for that wacky old Constitution of ours. How do you imagine Governor Abbot reacting to Obama informing the nation that he thinks he’ll just stick around for a while, only without those meddling kids in Congress? Probably not so well. Governor Abbot has most of an infantry division that works for him. All the other loyal governors have forces too. And, it being their home, those local boys and girls will fight.

Speaking of fighting, that brings us to one more little obstacle in the road to Coupville. That’s us – the American people. It’s been Obama’s greatest disappointment that he has been unable to crush and humiliate the decent patriots of this country who keep and bear arms for the defense of themselves, their families, their community and – oh yeah – the Constitution. Disarming us isn’t just fun; it’s a strategic necessity for a coup to work.

But American patriots buy 60,000 firearms every single day. That’s four infantry divisions worth. The U.S. military has (very) roughly the equivalent of 25 active and reserve infantry and armored divisions. Their troops’ dubious loyalty to some usurper president aside, that means every week loyal Americans arm themselves in numbers in excess of the basic ground combat forces of the U.S. military.

This is not the place to dispel the tiresome assertions of some Twitter keyboard commandos who argue that small arms in the hands of the populace can’t effectively oppose a modern army. They would not be the guys who had to run resupply missions across a state like Pennsylvania that was filled with several million ticked off deer hunters packing 30-06s. But let me just share a few words with you on that subject: Vietnam. Iraq. Afghanistan.

So, in the end, Obama will leave in January, and good riddance. Wargaming the possibility of the elite trying to retain its grip on power is an amusing exercise, but in the end, it’s those damn bitter clingers who would once again mess up the liberals’ scheme. Of course, we know those bitter clingers as something else – patriots.

Possible For sure but in my comment you will see how it would really pan out.
SOURCE URL: http://townhall.com/columnists/kurtschlichter/2016/07/20/obama-is-too-incompetent-to-pull-off-a-coup-n2194785?newsletterad=


Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by ProfChuck 7 years, 9 months ago
    Obama may not be competent enough to pull it off but he may well be brazen enough to attempt it. The consequences would be a constitutional crisis, chaos and major civil upheaval. The worst of is that Obama wouldn't care. In fact he would probably welcome the mess. Very sad state of affairs.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Comment hidden by post owner or admin, or due to low comment or member score. View Comment
    • Posted by $ 7 years, 9 months ago
      Frijoles. Can he do it without the military? No. What one major group does he not have behind him? The Military.

      Too much Hollywood. Not enough thinking. One thing we do have in common with the old CCCP people is units who think about insurgencies and counter insurgencies, all day long.

      No roles for Tom Cruise and Steffiie Seagull in this scenario. He is so much lower than contemptible he doesn't enjoy that level of importance amd Hillary even less.

      Wanderer might come up with a good screen play but would Denzel play the part? No.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by DrZarkov99 7 years, 9 months ago
    The assumption has always been that extremist groups in collusion with our would be god-king would start violent demonstrations that would make the Watts riots look like a kid's birthday party. When that enormous explosion of uncontrollable mayhem overwhelmed law enforcement and National Guard resources in (pick a state), it would trigger the Insurrection Act (passed in 1807 and still in effect) that would give the President the authority to impose martial law.

    However, comma, those same Soros-funded groups promised over 30,000 demonstrators would be on hand to annihilate the Republican Convention and destroy Cleveland. Even offering a bonus to the contracted thugs if they got themselves arrested couldn't raise enough rioters to make even a blip in the proceedings. They were few in number, and so incompetent that one who tried to burn an American flag set himself on fire.

    Given that pathetic demonstration, it's safe to say that the attempt to thwart a Republican President probably isn't going to happen.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by Herb7734 7 years, 9 months ago
    Obama might not be able to pull off a coup but the Alinsky-ites in his administration are wiling and able. But it's not yet the right time. I picture it after 8 years of Mrs. Clinton and a Republican is elected, would be the perfect time, or if Trump gets re-elected. If a Progressive keeps getting elected, a coup would not be necessary.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden by post owner or admin, or due to low comment or member score. View Comment
  • Posted by $ 7 years, 9 months ago
    The articles author brings uip good points but left out the following.

    He can't do it without the military and their oath absent the political appointee careerists at the top are as stated. NOT Friends of Obama. Protect and Defend the Constitution against all enemies foreign and Domestic. Nothing about Generals or Presidents.

    The military oath gives them the right and the responsibility and the duty to pull off not a coup but a counter revolution. White House Surrounded with all it's escape hatches blocked President is protected. Secret Service is happy. FBI won't act without an indictment. So Lynch is target number one. Don't need to control the country nor even the infrastructure just the media. That's CNN Fox and the Lame Streams. Total needed five pistols if that. Put out a carefully worded message it's business as usual. Cabinet and a few others meet and do a letter of Act of Succession required or it's a straight up uniform in the oval office temporarily. end of conversation. Congress is suspended while the buildings are searched for devices. They aren't allowed to meet elsewhere.

    The next elected group is seated IF they aren;t part of the coup and if they are Act of Succession used which is 535 names long. Bound to find someone suitable.

    Best of all it's legal, required and the duty of the military to protect the Constitution which a coup by definitions threatens.

    So Obummer strikes out again. In fact he isn't needed. His actions in ignoring the Constitution are sufficient evidence and proof without him sayiing a word.

    A Little conversation with FBI and the acting Attorney General could reopen an investigation. Who would appoint the AG. The military they are in charge on this deal that's their job. But it is an easy way to replace one problem with another one. Depending they wouldn't have to accept any of the candidates votes or no votes. Direct votes don't count anyway. and the reason for the coup would ahve to be investigtated

    Meanshile Act of Succession.

    And that's all it would take. handled properly about 24 hours, no fatalities short of suicide and the key personnel removed and probably replaced per Constitutional requriements Bingo

    What's the gainl Nothing much the return of Constitutional Republic as guaranteed.

    No tanks in the streets, civil rights and Bill of Rights restored. A hiccup in the life of the country.

    Really. It's just that simple. IF the military decides to uphold their oath of office. IFNOT we've got real problems.but for that go to the reporters who work for military.com.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by freedomforall 7 years, 9 months ago
    "So, in the end, Obama will leave in January, and good riddance."
    And unless a libertarian objectivist takes his place, very little will change for the better.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Comment hidden by post owner or admin, or due to low comment or member score. View Comment
    • Posted by $ 7 years, 9 months ago
      In the end Obama would leave on the day the military decided to act to protect the Constitution in this scenario. with Obama as the coup leader.

      Changes if any would be up to the military until they turned the country back over to regular government. They could require complete new elections any number of things.

      Changes. I didn't predict any changes just showed how known problems could be handled quietly and efficiently.

      Perhaps he shock and awe of the military feeling it was necessary to restore the Constitutional Republic would be enough to cause some changes. Perhaps the country would wake up but the whole move would be so ho hum probably not. There is no limit on doing what they feel necessary to attain that goal including removing their own Generals. and Admirals.

      I would suspect that top layer would be set aside from duty as suspect and complicit.

      Changes? Ideally uip to the citizens what do you think would happen.? As you can see the first comment was no change for the better. and then left the rest dangling. So Obama out, Current scheduled replacements shunted aside, Act of Succession follows. but full power not passed back until the military is good an ready. would they keep Trump if he was the winner? Would they keep Hillary if she was the winner? Both are not big time supporters of the Constitution. Any and all avenues including a new election ior no election is possible. Any directed change is possible.

      Persooally I would hope for a ban on Money as Free Speech and election rigging

      But who knows.

      I'm just a simple retired soldier who upheld and upholds his oath of office.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by Temlakos 7 years, 9 months ago
    I've always felt this way: Obama wants to stay in office, but he flatly wouldn't know how. Anyone trying to seize power on his behalf would indeed find a gun behind every blade of grass.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo