All Comments


Previous comments...   You are currently on page 2.
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 7 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Baby Killer is a phrase they took from the mirror it refers orignally to late term and partial birth abortions. As usual the left has no creativity so they must rely on the ever ready mirror to come up with their next negative descriptions worth hurling at decent people. So remember. What they say is only a description of themselves.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by fosterj717 7 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    You are spot on correct. The military is now being used by people that; a) have no understanding of the military, b) have little love for the military and, c) are only interested in politics and not military doctrine or meeting an "endgame" goal of winning!

    If you are not "in it to win it", it is time to get out and not waste American lives and wealth in sheer stupidity! This will be Obama's legacy.....
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by fosterj717 7 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Excellent! Harry Summers wrote the book regarding a post Vietnam assessment of what went wrong. Summers book has been used for several generations now as the handbook of what the military was and how it must be used and when it cannot.

    We have had approximately 25 years (or so) of an intelligently built and utilized military however now, under the incompetent gaze of the Obama (and yes, Bush) administrations, the military is back to its Vietnam era use (armed social workers without a military mission).

    Again, as in Vietnam, we are in "conflicts" that we are not even trying to win, run by a "politicized" military leadership with incompetent, political hacks calling the shots on behalf of an administration that hates the military.

    Witness the 300 flag officers that refused to become "hacks" of the administration that were all but cashiered out of the military.

    Harry Summer's book has all but been discarded by this administration hence our adversaries now have little fear and no respect for our men and women in uniform.

    So! As you said in your statement, "We didn't try to win" then (I.e., Vietnam) and we are not really trying now with these pin-prick drone strikes and soldiers being sent out on missions without proper support, credible missions deemed more dangerous now than at any other time. Stupid is as stupid does and Americans are being put in harm's way needlessly and for all of the wrong reasons.

    Welcome to Obama's "Political" war run by his faux "Best and Brightest" academic hacks......
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by fosterj717 7 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Excellent observation on the draft and the apparent reasons for its use during the Vietnam conflict however, there are certain aspects that are never touched upon that in my minds eye have significant weight in other "whys" that should be considered.

    If you remember, under Johnson there was a domestic strategy that was put in play by the Kennedy/Johnson "best and brightest" brain trust (I.e., McNamara, etc.) that embraced the "Guns and Butter" fallacy that provided a false prosperity back home. Hundreds of billions of dollars went into the war however the cynical "Great Society" was forced upon us as well.

    There was also a great recession that was starting and even taking hold in the mid to late 60's that had to be addressed. Thanks to the leading edge of the "Baby Boomer" generation, there was a growing concern about unemployment, disaster after disaster in the racially charged areas of the country and of course, the need for fighting men (and women) for Vietnam. This set the stage for the draft because in the eyes of Washington, (the Johnson administration specifically) both left, right and the economy were addressed. Guns and butter! Also, let's get all of those raging young men off the streets. It became a sociological medicine for what was ailing an out of touch nation now run against any and all of the founders brilliant legacy. Ayn Rand understood what was going on much better than even she was given credit for!

    I believe the draft was little more than a cynical tool of an irresponsible, growing statist government hunkered down within the Beltway!
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by fosterj717 7 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Correct! Obama and the left have learned nothing! There is absolutely no understanding of the military and how it should be used by this administration.

    Transgender, women in the foxholes and a whole raft of stupidity is making us the laughing stock and that is not good! Our enemies (current and future) are salivating at the gross incompetence now running the US military into the ground where it will not be able to meet even its most rudimentary mission requirements

    If this were a time of "declared" war, Obama would probably be impeached on the grounds of Treason.

    Incompetence, ignorance and malice aforethought are the marching orders of; Obama, his administration and now the Clinton candidacy! For what its worth!
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by fosterj717 7 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    True....In addition the Republican party generally now is the party of interventionism, well beyond what the founders conceived. Democrats have adopted the strategy of using the US military as "Armed social workers" and the NEOCONs want to wield it everywhere. It has become in many ways a symbiotic relationship, melding the Progressives on the left and the NEOCONS on the right. Classical Liberalism has been kicked to the curb along with the wisdom of the founders!
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by ewv 7 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Ayn Rand, "The Wreckage of the Consensus" in Capitalism the Unknown Ideal:

    "The question of the draft is, perhaps, the most important single issue debated today. But the terms in which it is being debated are a sorry manifestation of our anti-ideological 'mainstream'.

    "Of all the statist violations of individual rights in a mixed economy, the military draft is the worst. It is an abrogation of rights. It negates man's fundamental right—the right to life—and establishes the fundamental principle of statism: that a man's life belongs to the state, and the state may claim it by compelling him to sacrifice it in battle. Once that principle is accepted, the rest is only a matter of time.

    "If the state may force a man to risk death or hideous maiming and crippling, in a war declared at the state's discretion, for a cause he may neither approve of nor even understand, if his consent is not required to send him into unspeakable martyrdom—then, in principle, all rights are negated in that state, and its government is not man's protector any longer. What else is there left to protect?"

    That was just one part of Ayn Rand's analysis of the Vietnam war in her April 1967 Boston Ford Hall Forum lecture, before the nation ultimately rose up in fervor against the war and the draft. Her lecture is well worth reading or re-reading for its typical philosophical, principled approach, before the major national turmoil that was yet to come over a war which the country never should have been in.

    American's involvement in the Vietnam war was never in the country's interest or necessary for defense. It was an incompetent foreign policy adventure initiated by the incompetent president John F Kennedy and escalated by Kennedy and Johnson refusing to check their false premises. Kennedy also characteristically botched his Bay of Pigs invasion of Cuba when he amateurishly rewrote and neutered Eisenhower's invasion plans (see Victor Lasky's J.F.K.: The Man and the Myth) -- with disastrous long term results of permanent communist dictatorship in Cuba and the Cuban missile crisis with the Soviets.

    As Ayn Rand showed at Ford Hall in 1967, the Kennedy-Johnson foreign policy in Vietnam was hopelessly botched on principle from the beginning -- including the insane military strategy of 'fight with one hand tied behind our back'. The war escalated into a major national crisis before Nixon's Pragmatism made it worse, pointlessly disrupting the lives of and killing increasing numbers of American conscripts -- later under the name of a random lottery claimed to be "fair" and evading government responsibility -- and then causing increased suffering and injustice to the abandoned allies in Vietnam when Nixon abruptly "declared victory by withdrawing". The government under three presidents managed to do the worst of everything.

    The later and growing media opposition to the war didn't cause the national debacle, the media merely reacted to the popular opposition to the war stemming from the draft, which is what eventually stopped the war -- and rhetorically pandered to the propaganda of the left, making the whole crisis worse. Consequences we still suffer from today came from the rise of the New Left, which exploited opposition to the war and the draft as a platform on which to propagandize and elevate it's own influence and methods -- now inside of and running the government. That is the philosophical trend anyway, but exploitation of the Vietnam crisis accelerated it.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ allosaur 7 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I see I got out lucky and also with a two-month "school cut."
    So many lowdown SOBs with a (D) beside their names.
    But they always have a giddy parade of voting lemmings dancing along behind them.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 7 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Montgomerey (D) got our GI Bill we earned by putting a cutoff in his replacement. Stay in for a career you risked running into his up yours date. I had four months left so I went to heavy equipment school and earned enough to pay for the regular college. Back hoe work anyone?

    Al Ulman (D) of Oregon changed the rules on the housing loan thingamajig. We had put in for the allowoed expansion from two to three bedroom etc. When he clobbered that BUT since we had applied we had ha ha used the benefit and couldn't reapply underr the new rules. .

    Two more ways the left screwed military people. Wanna have a war? How about DC as the battleground.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ allosaur 7 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Okay, I'm relieved I don't have to challenge you to a duel, leaving you to chose pistols or swords or whatever else you may happen to think of.
    Dino Advice: Strive to make yourself clearly understood.
    I used my GI Bill to buy an education toward a degree in journalism, though I was a reporter/photographer for only 7 years before I took up another career.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 7 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    OK the kid finally gets up enough nerve and armed only with a little bitty flashlight on a key chain, too scared to flip on the big light switch for fear his folks will notice, he leans over and looks under the bed. Sort of upside down surrealism. Thee is tis the Obama Monster slobbering and chewing one some little kids bones. Then he looks at the brave kid and the face is not Obama...it's .....you guessed it. Who says, in a croaking creaky witch voice
    "Would you like to hear a true bed time story?"
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 7 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Not at all. The amount of draftees that were good troops was marginalized by the amount that did not want to be there no way no how and as a result caused enough problems to make the whole concept questionable at best.

    Coupled with that they were treated as second class soldier materials for HAVING to be drafted - and the ER/NG troops as little better than draft dodgers - by the Regular Army soldiers.

    Just as you got the good one's up to speed they were gone and another wave of questionable rookies showed up.

    Worse the military started the Shake'n'Bake Whip'n'Chill schools for instant Sergeants etc. whiich meant Regulars had to wait evern longer for their promotions no matter how well qualified and seasoned. Really hard to be on your second or third tour with all 'promotion points' in place and find out no...not this time ....we gave xyz slots to the newbies.

    The moral outcome was they were on their own in many instances. The good units put them under the experienced people until they were 'really' up to speed. Kept everyone alive and got the missions done.

    Some - a few were superb- and a few of them re-enlisted or extended. The rest we transferred to the line company units or to supply if there was room and turned them into pack mules.

    Being much of the time in a different type of unit we saw some of that but on the occasions (I did one year with the 101st as part of the mix I was able to experience the fallacy of the draft system up close and too damn personal.

    Think of that when you couch potato getting rid of the draft system. It's only purpose is to give people like LBJ a steady supply of cannon fodder. it's that veiled threat hanging in the background.

    Oh yes. And some of us had to work and occasinally bleed for our college education funds.. even worse some found out when they retired the system we had earned it under was shutting down and left us with nothing. So Mr. and Mrs. America no thanks to you for another broken promise. And don't thank me for serving my country I served the Constitution and still do.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 7 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Excellent. But the truism became even if the War Powers Act was voted on (only when the Prez was an Republican) withing three to six months the left had joined the other side. Truism number two . anyway you slice it wars started by Democrats kill more US military thatn wars started by Reublicans. That no longer can be figured since the Republicans became lap dogs of and the right wing of the left.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 7 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Thanks for your comment. They weren't as friendly when I was there.

    In '92 I was one of very few Americans in Ho Chi Minh City. Most westerners were Russian. Russians kept trying to talk to me. My Russian was poor and my accent was American. They'd stare at me stunned, then turn and walk away.

    I always smiled. I could sense their confusion - the Americans are back???

    I'd appreciate it if you'd read the first comment under "Thanks Nam vets". It's my answer to why we didn't win. I'd appreciate any comments about my thesis.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 7 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    The lessons of every war have to be relearned in every war. Three maybe four times we've had to relearn the lesson of hanging two peices of Pierced Steel Planking on the sides of trucks to use as sand tracks. Three times I'm aware off those items are taken off to keep some assholes idea of looking military happy. They don't stop to thiink of the need for rapid vehicle self recovery, during training exercises and the penalties of looking stupid when you don't have that sort of thing. Same goes for sandbagging the vehicles for protection from mines and things that go bump boom in the night.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 7 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    That's the common belief. Most of the NVA were city boys but what was true is they were for the most art execellent soldiers. Motivation? That accounts for those chained inside of the tanks when they rolled across the DMZ or attacked a camp somewhere? The motivation was non stop self examination and political motivation sessions as is common with that poltital belief. With some of the rest of what you said partly true and depending on where you were by 1971 the areas was controlled by the US Military and the SouthVietnamese who were not very good soldiers to be kind. At least the officer corps when they showed up. For motivated locals you wanted the hill peoples and some Nungs.

    The other side had one major factor working for them and only one. The will to win nor matter what it took and how long it took.

    The US does not have that from that day to this. as a nation. War to the general great unwashed is a video game with a reset button. They have yet to experience war other than some of their military and are for the most part not worth fighting for anyway.

    Which is why I repeat quite often I am glad I took my oath which was and is to the Constitution and ....nothing....else.

    Without the will to win which the country will never have with our political system there is only one more war and one more defeat snatched from the jaws of victory. Soldiers need more than that and a suspect quality pay check and retirement. Loyalty to that which is loyal to us provides that moral fibre needed. The Constiutional Republic and the Constitution.

    The rest is frijoles.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Flootus5 7 years, 10 months ago
    A friend of mine and his wife just strolled past the US Consulate last night in Saigon. Here is what he had to say:

    "We walked by the US Consulate last night in Saigon. It's located on the same patch of ground where the Embassy once stood. There wasn't much to see since the walls are high and the communist government had the original building demolished in 1975. The US has built a new consulate building to process visa applications. Everyday there are several hundred people lined up all day long to apply for a US visa. So even 40 years after the end of the war people who were not born understand what the US means.

    I nodded to the Vietnamese guard who smiled back with his MP5 at his side. It's interesting that even the guard had a friendly smile."
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 7 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    That was the older troops in my unit. They were advisers, consultants, and trainers but mostly evaluators. The consensus was a. No need. b. couldn't be won. c. but an easy place to get lots of medals real fast. We had that sort of presence in other continents. All of those were 'shooting wars' if you stepped into the wrong area at the right time. JFK did not think about pulling the roops out he ordered them out, got assassinated, and LBJ rescinded the order.

    That seems to be a fascinating question especially for the anti war people. The proper answer is go find out for yourself.

    WWI had less bombing because aircraft were the newest big deal weapon but they did have bombing. WWII was different. The frame of mind in Europe was left over from the years before. Attitudes change BUT you can NEVER judge any event except in the context of it's time. Your Next Century Quarterbacking means squat with out that significant feature. And don't go by medals. There's a sequence dealing heavily with rank and quotas things having nothing to do with any actions.

    Sad part is it automatically calls into question the ones who did deserve a medal, and calls into question those who didn't get one. By and large it has nothing to do with truth and honor.

    So if you want to know what it was like,anyone out there?Look in the green pages for Military, Recruitijng Office. Go find out for yourself.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Flootus5 7 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I remember my Dad, a WWII AAF P-38 crew chief in North Africa, lecturing the family in 1966. We needed to get the B-52's going in force and carpet bomb the crap out of North Vietnam and have done with it and bring our boys home.

    By 1972 he was so disgusted and fed up with the whole thing. A diehard American patriot sickened to his stomach. Moreover, his only son was both turning 18 and graduating high school in May of 1973. I did the pre-registering, of course got A1 status, and then came the draft lottery of #14. My Dad was actually considering on sending me to college in Nova Scotia. Dalhousie. But they ended the draft that spring and I was off the hook.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 7 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Another urban myth was vietnam was due to some scarce metal found only there and needed for the space program or whatever. The One I liked the best and probably closer to the truth was a combination of LBJ Lining his pockets and playing Texas Tough Guy one with OPM and one with OPL.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 7 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Easier in the day of free fire zones. It moved you shot it. It didn't move you shot it.'

    As for PTSD the ones I've run into were for the most part rear echelon types. That has held true from the late sixties until as late as yesterday. I'm of the opinion REMFs are perhaps not born but made but it could be both. Have I ever had my moments? Sure. But that was from surviving a marriage and divorce and let me see Carter as President. Not so sure about this one. For w hile I was waking up as if a child again and scared of finding a n Obama under my bed or in the closet. THAT was humor. .
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by mia767ca 7 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    my two sons went on full scholarship in florida...and kept the scholarship till graduation...very proud of them...smarter than dad...
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo