Eric Schneiderman, Maura Healey subpoenaed over prosecuting climate change skeptics
So when does "a Democrat-led coalition of 17 attorneys general working with environmental groups to pursue fossil fuel companies, starting with ExxonMobil, as well as academics and free market think tanks, for possible fraud for challenging the catastrophic climate change narrative." not equal a case of criminal conspiracy? If it was JUST the AG's, maybe a leagal investigation could be supported, but when you all band together to harass companies and scientists who disagree with your party line, I would say they are committing criminal conspiracy. Never seems to matters when looters want to have their way though...Soon they will be chasing conservative groups, let along readers of Ayn Rand. Oh wait..the IRS already did that...
If they want to go after fraud the ACA scam looting the producers,the workers in this land.
BTW if I sold my clients the way Barry Husein Obama did I would be sued I would be fined I would lose my license and that would be justified.
The American public now accepts blatant lies by
Politicians as normal and OK.
The left wants to stifle sound research because it is the only defense for their evil destructive agenda. I say FOF.
Good, prosecute Mr. Scheiderman, the looting statist fraud.
Just causes more resources wasted and more corruption.
are implementing the the "1984" of George Orwell and "Brave New World" of Aldus Huxley. Need anymore be said about this sorry state of affairs?
http://dailycaller.com/2016/06/27/dem...
The earth goes through changes and life is vastly different now than any time period you may choose to compare it to. Humans more than any other animal are able to be aware and learn to cope with or perhaps even control our environment. We are also able to view the consequences of our adaptations and work with making them less impacting and free market systems always seeks to do just that without being told. The free market does more to protect the earth than any other system. When JD Rockefeller learned how to make and market kerosene he accidentally did more to save the whales than any Green Peace Earth lover ever did. When he learned they were throwing away the byproduct gasoline he decided they had to find a way to use this product that was polluting the rivers. The unintended consequences of free market is to constantly find solutions to problems. The unintended consequence of tyranny is to cause problems by pretending they have answers and using violence to make others behave in line with their beliefs. No company focused solely on making profits wants to spill billions of dollars of crude into the ocean even if they don't care about the environment. When Mount Pinatubo exploded in the Philippines National Geographic scientists all agreed that it had put more co2 into the air than the last 150 years of human activity. I am aware that at first the amount of sulfur dioxide it sent into the atmosphere can reflect sunlight reducing the temperature of the atmosphere then it precipitates out of the air quickly compared to the co2. If humans have caused a spike in global temperatures there should have been one immediately after that, there wasn't.
The motive of some in the 'green' movement may be to save or protect the planet, the movements financiers are only interested in an excuse to control human behavior through regulation and if necessary the use of violence. This is a matter of those who 'feel good' about their behavior and want to inflict it on the rest of humanity.
Now "Their" speech might be considered falsely yelling FIRE in a crowded theater and therefore subject to a counter suit...I would expect. Especially when it's Not warming and the changes in climate are Not man made leading people, countries and civilization as a whole to not prepare for crop failures and colder temperatures...Oh,let's not forget the "Solar Panel" scam...ain't gona do any good when it's cloudy most days...
have been conned into going to college, where
they learn not to believe in absolutes (including the
reality of the individual human being), and to be-
come totalitarian statists?