Is it moral for an Objectivist to invest in gun manufacturer stocks?
A week or two ago I asked whether or not I was too late to invest in the stocks of gun manufacturers, some of which were up 70 or 80% in 2015. I probably am too late to profit from such an investment.
When I think of guns, I think of my own self-defense. However, if I invest in gun manufacturer stock prices going up as a result of the increasing chaos brought on by the looter/moocher cabal, am I violating the Objectivist principle regarding initiation of the use of force? Am I supporting statist thugs? I want to be non-contradictory about this, and yet profit immensely by my support of the 2nd Amendment.
When I think of guns, I think of my own self-defense. However, if I invest in gun manufacturer stock prices going up as a result of the increasing chaos brought on by the looter/moocher cabal, am I violating the Objectivist principle regarding initiation of the use of force? Am I supporting statist thugs? I want to be non-contradictory about this, and yet profit immensely by my support of the 2nd Amendment.
Previous comments...
As for me guns are tools for several purposes. Self Defense, The need for food. And when you realize the best defense is a good offense for attacking - who ever provoked you. They tools of the weapons category first and uses like target shooting are to hone skills nothing more and nothing less. There is a false premise in your initial theory. See if you can find it. There is a premise in my statement as well. But given the 'nature' of weapons and that includes baseball bats it's lions, and tigers and people that think only certain lives matter. Oh my? What is the first thing you think of when you see a red tie? Nice target http://marker.It's a sign of stupidity. And a blue tie? The enemy. Either one in a group? Target rich environment.
That's my moral values at work not yours.
As Sylvester so eloquently stated. They drew first blood. That doesn't mean i ihave to draw blood. It does mean it's open season.
I had to take a later bus so what the hell....why not join in for a bit.
However, the HP guns have a reputation for being one of the most dependable firearms on the market. No matter what you feed them, they reliably put rounds downrange, with respectable self defense range accuracy. The company has an unconditional warranty, repairing or replacing a malfunctioning gun, even for a secondary buyer.
Even the large manufacturers have trouble with maintaining production for wartime volumes. For example Colt subcontracting out M-16 production under their prime contract.
Edited to add the second paragraph and example.
the stocks of gun manufacturers, it is also moral
for an Objectivist to manufacture guns himself. And sell them. What kind of crazy question is this? So people might misuse the guns? Well, people might misuse kitchen knives. And people might misuse food. Somebody might
take a legitimate food product and sneak it into
the food supply of a person allergic to that food.
And people might misuse electronic appliances
and make a bomb. Come on!
Please read
http://finance.townhall.com/columnist...
You said..." I am seriously wondering whether I would be furthering the cause of those whom I do not support." Like Who?
http://www.fitsnews.com/2015/06/26/mo...