It appears the Left Now Has Three Candidates Running for President
Libertarian rivals won’t attack Clinton over emails for some reason
“I’m not a rock thrower in all this,” Johnson told Post columnist Ruth Marcus. “I mean, so many others devote their lives to this stuff, and I’ll let them devote their lives to this stuff. Bill has said all along that he’s never thought Hillary Clinton was criminal in any of these actions. For me, I’d rather be talking about grocery insurance.”
Weld, a veteran of the Justice Department, said that “justice was served” when Comey declined to pursue the case but explained to reporters that Clinton had acted irresponsibly.
“I thought that was correct,” Weld said. “I’ve been saying for a couple of months that I didn’t see any evidence of criminal intent on the part of Secretary Clinton. There’s a book in the Justice Department called ‘The Principles of Federal Prosecution.’ And under those principles, a prosecutor should not file charges unless that person’s convinced that the admissible evidence can obtain, and sustain on appeal, a conviction beyond a reasonable doubt from a reasonable and unbiased jury. I didn’t see that in all the verbiage that Mr. Comey put out there.”
Read the Article
http://hotair.com/headlines/archives/...
Bolth of them part of the coverup and shuck/jive? How Sad....for the Libertarians.
It's the Investigators job to provide the evidence and apparantly the investigation was so thorough the head guy didn't know Hillary had a record of lying under oath.
I don't buy his 'come to jesus' explanation. It' wasn't his job to determine the should or shouldn't . he could have but but wouldn't.
That job was squarely the responsibility of the Attorney General's office but instead they conspired in the fabrication of a cover up. they should have come out and said No we won't or Yes we will themselves but instead refused to act and not incidently uphold their meaningless Oath of Office.
No Morals, No Values, No Standards there.
But to see the Libertarian Candidates support that makes them part of the same conspiracy. So first let me apologize to the older, more experienced and wiser heads in the study of obvjectivism.
clearly i wasn't objective enough but just couldn't believe that of the Libertarians. I really thought they were Constitutiona Republic oriented . Clearly i was wrong.
Well now the left has three candidates for President.and Vice President. Which one of them do you think is really going to be Vice President or some other important job. the Deal Maker? The Anti Gun Activist a fformer a member of the DoJ? Which one.
Where does a Constitutional Republic supporter go?
Where ever it will be with honors and values morals intact. There's three that won't get my vote nor my support.
but who knows? the current story is what happened to the other investigations? Another story asked that queston but quite clearly expected a continued coverup.
I can now safely say no matter which one of the three the left will have garnered 99.9 percent of the votes cast.
Seig me no Heils Comrades I do NOT support your party.
“I’m not a rock thrower in all this,” Johnson told Post columnist Ruth Marcus. “I mean, so many others devote their lives to this stuff, and I’ll let them devote their lives to this stuff. Bill has said all along that he’s never thought Hillary Clinton was criminal in any of these actions. For me, I’d rather be talking about grocery insurance.”
Weld, a veteran of the Justice Department, said that “justice was served” when Comey declined to pursue the case but explained to reporters that Clinton had acted irresponsibly.
“I thought that was correct,” Weld said. “I’ve been saying for a couple of months that I didn’t see any evidence of criminal intent on the part of Secretary Clinton. There’s a book in the Justice Department called ‘The Principles of Federal Prosecution.’ And under those principles, a prosecutor should not file charges unless that person’s convinced that the admissible evidence can obtain, and sustain on appeal, a conviction beyond a reasonable doubt from a reasonable and unbiased jury. I didn’t see that in all the verbiage that Mr. Comey put out there.”
Read the Article
http://hotair.com/headlines/archives/...
Bolth of them part of the coverup and shuck/jive? How Sad....for the Libertarians.
It's the Investigators job to provide the evidence and apparantly the investigation was so thorough the head guy didn't know Hillary had a record of lying under oath.
I don't buy his 'come to jesus' explanation. It' wasn't his job to determine the should or shouldn't . he could have but but wouldn't.
That job was squarely the responsibility of the Attorney General's office but instead they conspired in the fabrication of a cover up. they should have come out and said No we won't or Yes we will themselves but instead refused to act and not incidently uphold their meaningless Oath of Office.
No Morals, No Values, No Standards there.
But to see the Libertarian Candidates support that makes them part of the same conspiracy. So first let me apologize to the older, more experienced and wiser heads in the study of obvjectivism.
clearly i wasn't objective enough but just couldn't believe that of the Libertarians. I really thought they were Constitutiona Republic oriented . Clearly i was wrong.
Well now the left has three candidates for President.and Vice President. Which one of them do you think is really going to be Vice President or some other important job. the Deal Maker? The Anti Gun Activist a fformer a member of the DoJ? Which one.
Where does a Constitutional Republic supporter go?
Where ever it will be with honors and values morals intact. There's three that won't get my vote nor my support.
but who knows? the current story is what happened to the other investigations? Another story asked that queston but quite clearly expected a continued coverup.
I can now safely say no matter which one of the three the left will have garnered 99.9 percent of the votes cast.
Seig me no Heils Comrades I do NOT support your party.
The legal issues are quite clear, but the political ones are like a dense fog. Another month of this and I think the Libertarian Party will splinter. Perhaps that is the plan.
Weld is about as anti-libertarian as one can imagine.
The bright side is that Johnson has won the vote of CG who voted for Obama twice.
I would think we haven't seen the last as in anyone charged with anything remotely simialar is qutomatically take the Hillary Defense and say that depends on what your definition of the word intent 'is'. Cleary Bubba had not intentions of haveing sex with 'that' woman. Perhaps all these years later he was talking about Hillary and not the Hoover Girl. Perhaps he was talking about a real Hoover.
Can you imagine letting your daughter become White House Intern with that combination in residence? CSD would be on your case like yellow on snow.
The Founders of America taught to avoid entangling foreign alliances. Were they also "loosey-goosey" and to be despised?
Libertarians differ 180 degrees from Democrats. They despise Big Government and endless neo-con war mongering and the welfare state. Saying they are the same is completely oblivious nonsense.
Republicans aka Rinos aka Neo-Cons are the right wing of the left. Traditionally it's the other side that hold the record for war mongering.
Democrats who asked to be called Socialists are the left and extreme left of the Sociaists. AKA Dinos and a few other terms such as Secular Progressives
Libertarians at least their two candidates made a speech event out of supporting the Socialist candidate.but claim not to be war mongers and despise big government. but still they did support the socialist candidate.
Not to forget welfare state the chief socialist extremist just endorsed Hillary except thought she was not extreme enough.
So they are not compltely the same. But 180 degrees? I would think the writers compass needs calibrating else why did they support the Wicked Witch of the Left.
Now that's a problem with defintions.
Left is government over citizens which seems to fit socialists both their right and left wings But not Libertarians.
Center is of course the Constitution and Republic so no change (and not the center of the left.)
Which means the liibertarians are not 180 degrees opposite. I'd say 180 degrees only in distance from the center where resides Constitutional Republic supporters.
At least until the new national flag, a left pointing arrow is made public.
Some ones compass wants adjusting.
I'm sticking with supporting a Consitutitonal Republic and you leftists can call yourselves anything you want. It will change by tomorrow anyway. If you don't like the comment you shouldn't play that role. Facts not fairy tales. A major disappointment. If you liie with pigs you get dirty and it's your crap not mine.
It's not expensive in the slightest.
I thought leftist was very sharply defined. 'Anyone who thinks government should control citizens instead of the other way around is a leftist.'
You might consider getting rid of leftist definitions they don't work anymore and take PC with you as well. Personally I don't use Fictionaries. Not expensive eitherl.