What Are You Going To Do About It? by Robert Gore at STRAIGHT LINE LOGIC
Justice and equality are inseparable. Equality here does not mean the fatuous and impossible equality of outcomes that animates collectivists, but equality before the law. Equality of outcomes in all its collectivist guises obliterates equality before the law, the foundation of which is the concept of individual rights. For that concept to have any meaning, each individual must have the same rights, which receive the same protection from the government. Individual, equal rights must be the basis of the law, and when they are not, no justice is possible.
Law instead becomes a tool wielded by those who control the government against everyone else. Yesterday’s announcement by FBI Director James Comey that the FBI would recommend against charging Hillary Clinton in the email matter is the government wielding the law to protect its own. The fix has been in since at least 1913, when it gave itself permission to steal its constituents’ money (the income tax) and to begin the process of profitably substituting its scrip for gold (the Federal Reserve Act). The Clinton fix is business as usual. The exempt-from-the-law class expect outrage and contemptuously ignore it. Indeed, disclosure of the Loretta Lynch-Bill Clinton meeting may have been designed to rub the noses of the not-exempt in it. Yes, it looks terrible, but we run things, you don’t. You don’t like it? Tough shit, what are you going to do about it?
This is an excerpt. For the full article, please click the above link.
Law instead becomes a tool wielded by those who control the government against everyone else. Yesterday’s announcement by FBI Director James Comey that the FBI would recommend against charging Hillary Clinton in the email matter is the government wielding the law to protect its own. The fix has been in since at least 1913, when it gave itself permission to steal its constituents’ money (the income tax) and to begin the process of profitably substituting its scrip for gold (the Federal Reserve Act). The Clinton fix is business as usual. The exempt-from-the-law class expect outrage and contemptuously ignore it. Indeed, disclosure of the Loretta Lynch-Bill Clinton meeting may have been designed to rub the noses of the not-exempt in it. Yes, it looks terrible, but we run things, you don’t. You don’t like it? Tough shit, what are you going to do about it?
This is an excerpt. For the full article, please click the above link.
Scenario #1 (didn’t happen): Hillary is recommended for indictment. The Dems find a way to block her nomination and replace her with someone equally bad, but without all the baggage. This candidate becomes our next President.
Scenario #2 (might happen): Hillary is “cleared”. Dems are stuck with her, as she continues to gradually lose ground to Trump in the polls, and Gary Johnson maintains his double-digit presence. The presidency is still up for grabs, and a Libertarian is very much still in the race.
The overreach and outrage may have come at just the right time to derail the Clinton machine once and for all.
i also have a novel i am outlining about the election in 2020...The Pledge...
than the opposition, IMHO. . I want the opposition to
apply the brakes while the Gary Johnsons of the world
gain strength. -- j
.
.
Yes, that is my whole point. Once the law becomes a fig leaf to hide rule of men, there is no more liberty.
Courts evolved a process to determine:
1. Is there a debt?
2. Who is responsible for the debt?
3. How will the debt be paid?
4. Issue an Order re: #3
Hildebeast created a "debt" when she broke the law. The court process has shown itself to be corrupt. Welcome to the Banana Republic of the United States.
And I paraphrase: 'People manage to shake off their dependence just long enough to select their new master and then relapse back into dependence, quite contented they had done enough for the protection of individual freedom; when, in fact, they just surrendered it to the power of the nation at large."
Load more comments...