FBI doesn't recommend indictment = Hillary skates

Posted by johnpe1 5 years, 11 months ago to Government
21 comments | Share | Flag

these people are "confusing" the laws;;; intent is NOT
required. . I know from my classification history. -- j
.
SOURCE URL: http://dennismichaellynch.com/fbi-renders-decision-on-clinton-email-case/


Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by ewv 5 years, 11 months ago
    Clinton knowingly violated several Federal laws breaching security and the FBI admits it. It was not "confused" about the law, which is as johnpe said it is. Those of us who have had top level security clearances know that immediately, but such a background is not required to understand the law.

    The FBI "recommendation" to the Justice Dept. said that criminal indictment is not "appropriate", and everyone knows what that means: "politically appropriate" on behalf of certain political interests.

    The FBI director, a political appointee, had to be the one to do it to pretend to be "professional" after AG Lynch had to say she would follow the 'professionals'" recommendation following her embarrassingly open meeting with Bill Clinton. Of course that was a 'social meeting', these people have been in power so long they don't know or care about the difference between their own power and their routine socializing among themselves. No wonder they thought nothing of it at the time and now laugh it off when everyone else understands the obvious.

    The posturing is now that we are expected to believe that the FBI "recommendation" not to pursue criminal charges wasn't a political decision. The corruption is increasingly cynically open. Who can take the law seriously anymore as anything other than political use of power for political purpose to keep the people in line, mixed in with prosecution of some actual crimes to give an appearance of legitimacy. "Respect for the law" now means a demand for respect for statism.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by 5 years, 11 months ago
      you couldn't tell that I was speaking sarcastically?
      I was the classification officer for a major manhattan
      project site and the law is quite obvious to me. . Comey
      was corrupted by the Clintons and it just goes to show
      us how power corrupts. -- j
      .
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by ewv 5 years, 11 months ago
        Comey is a political appointee who was corrupted by the administration with or without the direct intervention of the Clintons. It's all the same mafia -- "turtles all the way down". The law is quite obvious to them, too; the "confusion" is deliberate, hoping that a large segment of the public is confused enough to think the hacks are only confused.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by jpellone 5 years, 11 months ago
    I had an Ensign get kicked out of the Navy for leaving the vault unlocked for 2 minutes while he walked into the connecting space. We were at sea at the time.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by Herb7734 5 years, 11 months ago
    The only "intent" involved is Comey's intent to cover his ass. We are told what an honorable, fair man the head of the FBI IS only to see him fall right into the same pattern of deceit as all the rest. The glowing descriptions of the man now seem like a set-up so that no one will take issue with his decision. Screw that! The man is a shill for the elites, because even a deranged nutcase can tell that there are prosecutable offenses in what Mrs. Clinton did.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by term2 5 years, 11 months ago
    The real issue with Hillary wasnt indictment. It was that she wants to do things in secret and hide it from public view- just like her crooked husband did with monica lewinsky and many others.

    I thought Clinton should have been impeached not for having sex on the side, but for actually thinking he could do it and the woman would keep quiet about what happened (she did for about an hour....). Terrible judgment.

    With Hillary, she is just a snake in the grass. She wanted to make sure she could delete anything that came up later that could be used against her. She was a terrible Secretary of State, who did nothing at all, and offers nothing good for us as president.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by 5 years, 11 months ago
      she embarrassed us with her reset button crap and
      lies about landing among gunfire ... and intent isn't
      necessary, though it is obvious. . and we probably
      owe snakes an apology. -- j
      .
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden by post owner or admin, or due to low comment or member score. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 5 years, 11 months ago
    Instead they will go after a Navy Reservist using the exact reverse of their argument tht excused Hillary.

    But....they did not comment on the other ongoinig investigations including the multi million dollar foreign donations to the Clinton Foundation.

    Just who was Hillary working for when she a. ignored repeated warnings about her private email system as a security problem and why...in terms of dollars.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo