Its nauseating to see exactly how corrupt out government is..

Magna Carta, equal justice my ass.

One big happy club of elitists covering for each other.
The average Joe would be bum-rushed to jail.

We are now entering the bannana republic stage ....

If she was not a politician with pull she would have been prosecuted or she would have settled with a fine. Instead, now she "owes" someone in the justus department and if she is elected she will pay them off with a cabinet post.

The BATF and the FBI have been burning innocent people to death without any prosecution for three decades. About time you realized the government is corrupt.

Government is corrupt down to its base in villages, towns, and cities with closed meetings and contradictory rules and regulations. As with the FBI chief, the laws are read by those who cannot or refuse to understand their contents. For example, in the small village where I live, the board members could not understand that when a law says that such and such AND other such and such must hold, both must hold. I pointed out that about 'and' but they said that they had found that the right side of the 'AND' was true and therefore they could proceed regardless of the left side. So now we, in a village of 1700, have an extra $23,000,000 debt which occurred after being debt free plus taking stimulus money with the requirement to repay adds extra to water bills for the unforeseeable future. Just on a smaller scale but just as corrupt as the big guy's government.

The day after the 4th of July, I removed the American flag from the front of my house. :-(

And if she becomes President they will find themselves in a serious moral dilemma with regard to following her orders.

It is a war out there, and its NOT against foreign invaders. It is freedom loving people vs the establishment in the USA. I resent every penny that government collects from me, as they just use it to control me and steal more from me.

Hillary is my enemy, always has been. I have seen through her for a long time. Too bad the voters cant see it.

To the Trump haters out there, your trashing of Trump will get you Hillary for at least 4 years. You threw away probably the last chance to slow down the advance of full on cronyism.

Oh got to fear Hillary "the ends justify the means" Clinton. So if I am extremely careless about how I drive and people die, that is criminal. If an autocrat is extremely careless about emails and people die, that is a slap on the wrist. Too bad I can't sell insurance packages for email negligence. This would have made me a fortune.

My take on this is that Comey was told that no matter what he found, the crown prosecutors would not convict (i.e. orders from Lynch). Too bad Comey decided to give in rather than putting in the hands of the DoJ so we could see politics in action.

Perfect counterpoint to the issue where they arrested and convicted a black man of espionage for releasing information when the CIA had a case go bad in Iran:

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/27/us/...

Hillary is not guilty of anything, yet the black man who tried to save his fellow agents from getting caught because of Obamanation administration screw ups goes to jail. Where are all the protests?

Hillary is a clear criminal, arrogant to the point of no law is not below her magnificence and the sheeple will still vote for it. Her presidency will not be legitimate

The Atlas Puked Award ........Comey.

Some profound thoughts: https://www.levintv.com/videos/ep84--...

I have taught for thirty years that this system, the American constitutional system, is the closest thing to freedom for the individual created by Man! Now I have to say I was a lying sack of crap, a blind idealist, an ostrich with my head in the sand! Dumb ass!

If she had been found not guilty and then someone (Guccifer? Snowden?) released an un-redacted email taken from Hildabeast's server, well, tough. Double Jeopardy and all that.

But I wonder if the decision not to charge her could be reversed in that same scenario.

And I wholeheartedly agree with the first comment I see posted: It is nauseating.

Let's see. Bill Clinton appointed Loretta Lynch to a judgeship. Lynch works for Obama who already said months ago, that Hillary didn't do anything wrong. Comey works for Lynch. So everyone works for somebody else. A few weeks ago Hillary put a shot across the bow of Obama when she stated EVERYONE knew she was using an unsecured personal server. Then at least one email is found from Obama to Hillary to her personal server. So while I'm disappointed, I am not surprised at the results. We're dealing with lifelong career politicians, an American political aristocratic class. Many will fall on the sword for their sake. Yesterday we witnessed Comey fall on the sword. This is going to be an interesting foot note in history books.

I don't understand why the "standard", is that of a "reasonable person"! The person that occupied the office of the Secretary of State and who wishes to become the President of the United States, should be held to a much higher level than that of just a reasonable person. They should be held to the standard of one who is very informed and aware of the letter of the law, its intent, and what content is or is not classified material, matters of national security, and the consequences for themselves and the security of our nation when breached, or when the door is left so wide open that the figurative red carpet was potentially rolled out to our enemies!

I really, truly, dislike Hillary Clinton and think she would be a disaster for the country, pushing us farther toward socialism. Nevertheless, I found the analysis reasonable.

It found that she and members of her staff probably broke the law, but not to such a degree that it would be likely to be prosecuted. The key issue was that while reckless, the emails were in the performance of her legitimate duties and not to deliberately reveal secret data . The FBI judgement was that such activity would probably not be typically prosecuted -- although they suggested that administrative sanctions would likely be imposed, which is moot now as she is no longer in the department.

Since we know from books like "Three Felonies a Day" it is common for people to break laws and not be prosecuted, in fact it's a daily occurrence. While she will claim "vindication" it clearly documented the reckless lack of judgement that she was responsible for.

Of course there was no analysis of why she did this, although the presumption is to keep her communication from legitimate inquiry. And, most importantly, there was no reference whatsoever to any analysis of impropriety with respect to the the Clinton Global Initiative and various donations and speaking fees that were paid by people seeking favorable treatment.

This was just about classified document handling.