Hank and Dagny or John Galt
Posted by richrobinson 13 years, 6 months ago to The Gulch: General
With the current state of the country should we be more like Hank and Dagny or John Galt. I feel the country is still worth fighting for. In a sense John Galt gave up. The election will tell a lot about where we are headed.
Have you ever read Catch-22?
*spoiler alert!*
Basically, Captain Yossarian HAS to fly in WWII, but he's afraid of dying. Thing is, he can't not fly, because if he claims insanity, then obviously he's sane and can fly. But if he wants to fly, then he's insane and has to stay on the ground. But only he can report himself as insane, and if he reports himself as insane, he has to fly, etc.... That's the Catch-22. In the end (here's the spoiler) he realizes that he's not going to play the game, that the Catch-22 does not exist, and he runs away. In effect, he goes Galt. Can you say that Yossarian "gave up" because he did not want to die? Because he was forced into a choice nobody had the right to give him?
It's basically the same with Galt. He can either be a slave to socialism, or enslave somebody else. Which would you choose? John is the first to realize that it's a false choice; he, like Yossarian, does not need to play the game.
I totally understand why you would say he "gave up," but given his philosophy, I don't think it's an accurate statement. I do, however, agree that the US is still worth fighting for. The question is, for how long? Hopefully we can get it back on the right track before we have to make Galt's choice.
Sorry, didn't intend to be preaching.
Fact is I went Galt in the late 90s, but haven't found a Gulch yet.
America as a nation of free individuals is worth fighting for, but America as a collectivist plantation is not. When Hank and Dagny realized that, they "went Galt". I believe this is part of the message "Atlas Shrugged" is all about.