This goes along with what the UN wants. They would give birth control to all, and then issue antidotes to only those with approval to have a child. Who knows what other cocktail meds are in those vaccines, which can be set off later. I do not trust them since Bill gates told a gathering on need to reduce population, that vaccines were the wa to go.

Doctors have NOT been removed from the medical decision process. Such nonsense.

Part b under the intent of the legislature, states: "...persons required to be immunized be allowed to obtain immunizations from whatever medical source they so desire, subject only to the condition that the immunization be performed in accordance with the regulations of the department and that a record of the immunization is made in accordance with the regulations.

Part c (c) Exemptions from immunization for medical reasons.

So right away having access to the SB-277 bill shows the OP is wrong about more than one thing. Doctors have NOT been removed and medical exemptions are granted, just not religious ones.
http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/fac...

69 vaccinations!!! Is Pelosi's hubby involved in the pharmaceutical biz??

.... "[T]hey think 'let's use force to make a better world.' "
Better, according to whom? According to which values? Then along come the unintended--and intended--consequences.

Is one of them an anti-socialist vaccine? In that case the ends justifies the means, and I'd let 'er rip. Otherwise it is time for a lawsuit, and court order stopping the vaccinations.

the new fascist totalitarian state...

Cronyism at its best. I think Trump has tapped into the middle class resistance to cronyism that benefits the rich at the expense of everyone else. He has my vote and I hope there are more anti-establishment anti-cronyism politicians.

actually it was if they had one their brains are the first to go.

Even dogs and cats are "Over" vaccinated...they give a small animal enough for an elephant! We breed Maltese, we see what they are "regulated" to do...so we and most other breeders have taken control and have reduced the quantity to suit the size of the animal. Our animals live a whole lot longer and healthier as a result.

"In times like these, when their fat little comforts are threatened, you may be sure that science is the first thing men will sacrifice." - Ayn Rand

LOL...

Polio was spread via water and feces. Cleaning up the water stops polio. Why do you think we started chlorinating public swimming pools? Why do you think America has the best backflow prevention in the world? I know...I've designed a lot of it... And, yeah...how many are dying of whooping cough? About the same amount dying of tetanus. Want to venture a guess? What to venture a guess why we can't eradicate polio in India? What does India have, infrastructure-wise, that we don't have? Want to take a guess?

I saw a stat yesterday that I was discussing with our pediatrician just last night. About 1/5 of children in America may have zero vaccination. Zero. So..."where are the wards full of polio victims on ventilators"? Do you know what percentage of people who get polio actually show any symptoms at all? It's certainly a very complicated, horrible disease. Want to stop it? Clean up the s&^t. Want to empty 2/3 of the world's hospitals? Clean up the water.

I'm talking about modern day vaccines. What your talking about is vaccines from a time when science was a bit more responsible and not so concerned about majority shareholders...to put it nicely...today, many of those vaccines are useless. One just needs to look at unbiased statistics.

No proof that vaccines do anything good at all? So where are the wards full of polio victims on ventilators? The people walking with braces and crutches because they only got a mild case of paralysis.

And how many are dying of smallpox. Young children dying of whooping cough?

It's mandatory for dogs and cats. Why not humans? ;)

Just for argument sake, let's say these vaccinations are beneficial...does it Really make any sense at all to give multiple vaccinations at One time starting from the moment one leaves to womb. I think not...It makes sense to me that doing that would overwhelm the body. The body learns from what you give it, if you give it something that supposedly protects it then the immune system is of no use and therefore is compromised. The way these vaccines work do not help the body to do anything because it allegedly does it for the body...but I seen no proof that the vaccines do anything good at all.
Never mind the issue of Force...I would call this law...initiatory force.

The sad thing is I think you're wrong about contributions from vaccine makers. The scientific evidence shows vaccines are a good decision. Lawmakers and voters think, "Think of how marginalized people who don't understand science or just don't have their act together. We could save their children's lives." They think people need a parent, and that parent is the gov't--- so unhealthy and wrong!

I actually do think many people are irresponsible and could use a parent (grandparent, in this case), but I don't want it to be big brother. Then there are people like you who are responsible, intelligent, and paying attention, and just disagree with mainstream medical opinion on this for clear reasons. It's parents' natural right to make these decisions for their kids.

So I wish you were right that it took serious campaign money to sway lawmakers to use force. The bar for what justifies gov't force is so low in people's minds that if the evidence shows it's a good idea, they think "let's use force to make a better world."

Actually, the number should climb to 100 vaccinations in short order, since the lawmakers are receiving big checks from the pharmaceutical companies. The law was written to allow lawmakers to expand their new schedule as they see fit. First one added was Gardasil for boys, right after the law was passed. Gardasil for boys...haha....