How could a proclaimed Objectivist and a personal friend of Ayn Rand like Alan Greenspan ever think it was OK to be Chairman of something so corrupt as the Federal Reserve System?
Posted by ycandrea 8 years, 10 months ago to Philosophy
It goes against so many principles of Objectivism, ie it is total governmental central control of our monetary structure, it is not mentioned anywhere in our U S Constitution, thus unconstitutional, the chairman is not elected so he is not accountable to anyone, and it is flies in the face of Capitalism. Does this contradictory behavior of a prominent Objectivist bother anyone but me?
Previous comments... You are currently on page 3.
See Jekyll Island scheme.
But it goes much further back in time.
It was the result of a well orchestrated scheme.
First create havoc in the commodities markets and economies with booms and busts in manipulated actions. Then promote an unacceptable solution with the fed plan as your real goal. Lie lie lie about the fact that it will end bank failures and than 15 years later every bank in the country fails. Than take away the gold make it illegal to own, force exchange to fed reserve notes.
Upon discovery I wondered why such an important part of our country wasn't taught or complained about by the leaders.
I don't wonder any more.
From Gold and Economic Freedom by Alan Greenspan in 1966 (Ayn Rand, Capitalism: The Unknown Ideal):
"The abandonment of the gold standard made it possible for the welfare statists to use the banking system as a means to an unlimited expansion of credit. They have created paper reserves in the form of government bonds which - through a complex series of steps - the banks accept in place of tangible assets and treat as if they were an actual deposit, i.e., as the equivalent of what was formerly a deposit of gold. The holder of a government bond or of a bank deposit created by paper reserves believe he has a valid claim on a real asset. But the fact is that there are now more claims outstanding than real assets."
How anybody that sees the nature of a scam, decry it as evil, and then fully participate in and perpetuate that very scam, is beyond me. How could one live with oneself?