Thank You, Mr. Trump, by Robert Gore

Posted by straightlinelogic 9 years ago to Politics
76 comments | Share | Flag

There has been no shortage of commentators pointing out these facts—for years, even decades—but by definition, even if their audiences were in the millions they were “fringe.” Back in late 2014, immigration reform—a “path to citizenship,” de facto amnesty, and meaningless promises of tighter border security—was the prevailing mantra, chanted by both parties’ candidates, endorsed by all right-thinking pundits as necessary to secure the increasingly important Latino vote (support from Republicans was paradoxical—most immigrants vote for Democrats). There would be no immigration issue because dissenting views were marginalized or suppressed, and the “solution” to the problem was a done deal regardless of who was elected.

Then Donald Trump called Mexican immigrants rapists and proposed building a wall at the border, funded by Mexico. The epithet and proposal were outrageous, but the concerns of millions of Americans had been ignored or dismissed as racist and xenophobic. It took something outrageous to get those concerns on the table and force the Cloud People to pay attention. They did so not out of any solicitude for the unwashed, the Dirt People, but because Trump jumped to the top of the polls. Immigration will be a front burner issue through the general election, and attacks on Trump supporters by Mexican-flag-waving thugs will only help his cause. He doesn’t even have to say: “What did I tell you?” It’s implied.

This is an excerpt. Please click the above link for the full article.


All Comments


Previous comments...   You are currently on page 2.
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 9 years ago in reply to this comment.
    Excellent Now I know how to trace specific claims. not that I much care about Comrade Reid. I view him using the same rule my Dad explained when we were little. Chanced are high if this spanking was for something some other kid in school did and for which you were blameless it' will make up for whatever we didn't catch you doing. The point is punishment is for getting caught. Extent of punishment is 'doing what

    I appreciate the advise on the search methods. So R +D = total money of all types to pay for the Government Party's biannual charade. I think the left costs too much for what they produce or rather don't produce. No wonder they believe in zero sum gain.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by jimjamesjames 9 years ago in reply to this comment.
    Ten Sleep is a cool little town. Longest I spent in Mexico was seven months in a Mexican prison. And I was innocent, honest!!!
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 9 years ago in reply to this comment.
    That should take a year or five. Now how about the $2.00 check off from the tax forms? Starting with myself that zero dollars. Wasn't it air head McCain that agreed to not take it then the other side stiffed him or was that Dole from Kansas?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by Hot_Black_Desiato 9 years ago in reply to this comment.
    download the spreadsheets from http://fec.gov. Sort all donations by Trump, Trump organization.

    Total all donations, donations to all candidates with an R, then those with a D, the use basic division.R = GOP and D= Democrat.

    This will take you some time since you have to do each year seperately. Then while you are at it, go to each candidate, like Harry Reid, and sort each year dating back decades, and see how many contributions you see from Trump or Trump organization to him or Hillary and the quantities or total dollar amounts. You will find Ted Cruz was lying through his teeth with his claims, especially when it comes to Harry Reid.
    That would be defined as empirical.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 9 years ago in reply to this comment.
    Excellent choice of words. But he's championing a different cause or should I say a different flavor of the same cause. I don't like any kind of socialism National or International.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 9 years ago in reply to this comment.
    Stopped to visit the nearby Lats and Atts office when heading south. Only time and remembered the old poem since I'm now in the Yelapa Latitudes. Don't know why but I really liked Ten Sleeps in your new home State.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by jimjamesjames 9 years ago in reply to this comment.
    Hey, Mike, I grew up in Redondo Beach. Move to Wyoming 37 years ago. Go out once a year to reunion with my high school and college buddies. No way in hell would I live in Redondo Beach again.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by mccannon01 9 years ago in reply to this comment.
    When foreigners come into my country and desecrate and burn my flag, then fly their flag while cheering, they are not immigrants. They are invaders. If the likes of La Raza and their apologists choose to call me a racist or xenophobic, then they can kiss my ass. Go Trump!
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 9 years ago
    And with all the vitriol and negative poison and a step by step manual of the 1930's in one hand and the daily news in the other the drawing of some conclusions is inescapable. yet ignored.

    It isn't the USA anymore and hasn't been unless you are old enough to predate Woodrow Wilson.. It's a progressive cancer waiting to take full control of a carcass.

    It isn't Hamiltonian or Jeffersonian anymore it isn't any kind of American Dream unless your dreams were after a round of heavy Marxism and too much vodka.

    It isn't 640 acres a mule and a plow or 100 and a cabin in the woods nor a a one acre housing lot with it's own 'in the city' garden plot, nor even a quarter acre with room for a one car garage, It's tin can houses stacked within arms reach yet costing more than the the home of The Beaver. or Ozzie and Harriet.

    People aren't asked to vote for a bright future or a with some degree of hope but for a choice of degrees of despair and only the very young, innocent, and naive would think otherwise.

    I'm of a mind today to liken the country as a whole to an oil field in Colorado. The residents finally shrugging and the whole waiting for the inevitable spark. The sign reads Here it is as I found it as the landscape burns horizon to horizon and ocean to ocean. And still those who think let's vote for so and so and he will slow the drift to the left as the vote for same old same old nothing new old give us another chance old - tired - useless - tinder.

    And let's not forget the Polly Anna's Every time I hear them or read something they wrote I want to jack slap the crap out their empty heads as they offer move on nothing here to look at.

    Turn out the light? No the last one should give the country a decent burial and put up a new sign. It's yours, leave it as you made it. Now live with it and deal with it.

    We're at Left Over Station the end of the line. My watch the flock scatter, hunt and peck looking for some scratchings and finding only cinders.

    I think I'll move down to free north America and prepare the next wave of immigrants. Plow, burro, and an appetite for work not excuses.

    North America is there turn now.

    As for me I'm sitting in a falapa quite near to Yelapa and find it more pleasing than a condo in Redondo.

    Click!
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by lrshultis 9 years ago
    Having dealt with relatives who were actually bigots, one grandfather was even a member of KKK, an uncle who could not say a sentence without some kind of racial or ethnic comment in it, etc. I have no problem with Trump's saying poorly thought out nonsense. I have more trouble with eminent domain and his belief that money of businessmen in Mexico belongs to the Mexican government so that it is available to build a wall with.
    I wonder if the following web sight is correct about crime?:
    http://www.immigrationpolicy.org/spec...
    If so, native born citizens need some improvement.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by blackswan 9 years ago in reply to this comment.
    That just shows you that if you want to get your message out, you have to be louder than the competition. The impression was that ALL of the other candidates were spouting milquetoast pablum, when Trump jumped in, throwing grenades, and breaking the china.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ jdg 9 years ago
    That first paragraph just ain't so. Ted Cruz wanted a border wall, too. He just isn't the kind of loudmouth that Mr. Trump is.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Herb7734 9 years ago
    After being ignored and marginalized for years, those concerned about illegal immigration were astounded by a candidate who came right out and said what they had been saying to each other, to those who promised to do something about it, to the local press, and talk radio. He actually verbalized in a bold manner the words they'd been longing to hear. And the mushy, wimpy, lying politicians couldn't understand his appeal. Once again I proclaim I am not a big Trumpeter. But, if he goes after the problems with the economy, pointing out how jobs can be grown by lowering taxes and cutting out over-regulation with the same enthusiasm, while pointing out Clinkton's foibles - he will win.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by johnpe1 9 years ago in reply to this comment.
    I had a divorce of that sort, and it tore out my innards
    where I didn't think I had any -- new places, new hurts,
    new anguish. . the current process is much the same! -- j
    .
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by Hot_Black_Desiato 9 years ago in reply to this comment.
    I care more about the content, than the delivery. I watch PhD. academic MORONS, ignore totally valid points because the author dared not put a comma in the right place, or heaven forbid misspelled a word.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by ObjectiveAnalyst 9 years ago in reply to this comment.
    Hello johnpe1,
    I believe there is much in what you say. It has gotten to the point where people would burn the house to the ground rather than see it further defaced and dishonored by the establishment. It is much like a messy divorce. We have irreconcilable differences.
    Respectfully,
    O.A.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by johnpe1 9 years ago
    the unwashed masses are angry, want revenge, and
    have tried the nice way -- quiet voting, the tea party --
    and that didn't work. . DT will shake things up. -- j
    .
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ CBJ 9 years ago in reply to this comment.
    "Barring entry is a form of force as surely as punching someone in the face is." Barring entry to what? Entering property you do not own, without the owner's permission, is trespassing and an initiation of force. In a society based on Objectivist principles, any "public property" is the property of its citizens, administered by the government for their protection and benefit. It is not the property of those seeking to immigrate, and they have the right to do so only with the permission of the government, and with agreement on their part to adhere to its rules.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by JohnConnor352 9 years ago in reply to this comment.
    Who's talking about rallies? I'm talking about his policies! He seeks to exert unchecked control over our economy to promote what he views as the better types of production. He's exactly the same as Obama in this regard, but rather than promoting green energy, Trump focuses on "made in America" stickers and manufacturing jobs. It's the same irrational, evil concept just aimed at different pet projects.

    No matter how much you "want" something, you do not have the right to use force to achieve it, nor ask others to use force in your stead. Barring entry is a form of force as surely as punching someone in the face is.
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo