Is the First Lady fair game?

Posted by mminnick 10 years, 1 month ago to Politics
43 comments | Share | Best of... | Flag

The first Lady was invited to give the Commencement Address at a college. During this speech, she made comments about Donald Trump. My question is having made these comments is she now fair game for Mr. Trump to comment on in return and even if she is, should he?


All Comments


Previous comments...   You are currently on page 2.
  • Posted by Herb7734 10 years, 1 month ago
    Make a political comment, expect a political reply. We all do it, we all deal with it, and being in her position, it would be shameful if she didn't feel the heat.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by TheOldMan 10 years, 1 month ago
    Is this the same speech where she complained about waking up in a house built by slaves? Why didn't she move out?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ jdg 10 years, 1 month ago
    I wonder if Bill Clinton will dare to open his mouth once he is First Bitch.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ jdg 10 years, 1 month ago in reply to this comment.
    The Left does seem to enact a lot of rules -- such as the new CFPB rule about payday lending -- which show such a total lack of understanding of what it's like to be poor, that I call them "Let them eat cake laws."

    The Left's opponents, both conservative and libertarian, need to start calling them on it.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ allosaur 10 years, 1 month ago
    Mrs. Obummer has been fair game since this amateur Dietician-In-Chief turned school lunches into PC blaugh.
    In fact, Moochie first became fair game when first time around Candidate Hitlery openly reacted to the infamous "first time I'm proud to be an American" statement.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by scojohnson 10 years, 1 month ago
    Considering that she is far too important to diverge an hour or two from her schedule/agenda to share a ride on Air Force One (and instead spends millions of our money taking her own transport with her own entourage) - happens on all of their trips - I would label her as a moocher and a de facto administration staffer. If she was minding her own business like Laura Bush was and just encouraging kids to read, that would be different. M O'bummer seems to be intent on setting policy, arguing the liberal view points, and acting like a low-class piece of trash while pimping J.Crew clothes as product placement for side gifts & side cash.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Eyecu2 10 years, 1 month ago
    Don't throw a punch, verbal or otherwise unless you are willing to suffer the counter.

    She has long been a political animal therefore I feel that she was fair game from the start.

    The real question is whether or not she is worthy of notice? My personal opinion of her is that she is beneath whale feces, but then again The Donald has never shied away from slinging that kind of stuff in the past.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Esceptico 10 years, 1 month ago
    First of all, a commencement address is about the students, not politics. Secondly, if anyone chooses to enter the fray, they are fair game. Go get her Donald.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by term2 10 years, 1 month ago
    Michelle Obama reminds me of a backup singer in the Supremes group of the 60's. She has NO class and should just be ignored. Nancy Reagan had class. Jackie Kennedy had class. Even Barbara Bush had some class. But Michelle Obama has NONE
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by mia767ca 10 years, 1 month ago
    If she going to get involved by commenting, then she has invited feedback...
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Dobrien 10 years, 1 month ago
    Fair game gives the assumption that there are rules to be followed. The party in charge has been shredding the rules. Including the rule book.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 10 years, 1 month ago
    Yes. Once they interject themselves into politics their just meat on the hoof. By choice. Especially choosing an important or was an important rites of passage ceremony and cheapening it. She made her bed let the tomatoes fly....

    One should not cast unfounded aspersions however. for example terming her Michelle Antoinette the Queen Moocher because of the Paris jaunt 7.5 years ago. Antoinette is NOT her real name. The rest is accurate. Another example would be using her socialist leanings to change that name to ..mmmm....Eva Michelle Antoinette Obomba Braun. Her name is NOT Eva. Just two frinstances. (from For instance elided into one word).
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by dave42 10 years, 1 month ago
    In my opinion, the President's family is off-limits for political attacks as long as they remain non-political, only supporting non-partisan causes like encouraging reading, physical activity, or drug addicts getting treatment, or photo-op appearances at a small number of important political events (party nomination, inauguration, etc.

    Michelle Obama stepped outside of this circle of protection with her 'do it my way or lose federal funding' school lunch program, so she's fair game politically.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Thoritsu 10 years, 1 month ago
    Her and Matt Daemon from MIT's graduation ceremony. But what is the point?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ AJAshinoff 10 years, 1 month ago
    Anyone should be able to speak freely about anyone else. If truth is spoken moochelle can't do anything about it. DT, if he responds, shouldn't double barrel it. He should just speak truth, its damning enough.
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo