Jackson versus Hamilton, From Centralization to Jacksonianism

Posted by UncommonSense 12 years, 4 months ago to History
4 comments | Share | Flag

This is a brilliant article. It's funny how things never really change concerning money, power & perceptions by those who can enable change (for the good, not the collective)
SOURCE URL: http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/07/10/Jackson-v-Hamilton-from-centralization-to-Jacksonianism


Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by khalling 12 years, 3 months ago
    The original First Bank of the US was not a central bank. It was a private bank, had private investors who owned roughly 80%. Most of its directors were not appointed by the govt, it didn't have the power to create currency that was backed by legal tender laws. It was formed because a govt needs a place to hold its reserves, receipts, and to be able to pay people easily. Jefferson, nor Jackson for that matter, were not understanding of finance. remember Jefferson's stance that we would be an agrarian nation forever.
    Hamilton's plan to take on all the states' revolutionary war bonds and tie them to a national revenue source, caused the US bond rating to go from junk level, in today's terms, to AAA in less than three years. It wasn't fair initially to some of the states, such as VA, but overall benefited everyone in the US by making it easier to borrow and transact.
    Hamilton's greatest evil was in the whiskey rebellion (still tax).
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo