"Civilization is the progress toward a society of privacy. The savage's whole existence is public, ruled by the laws of his tribe. Civilization is the process of setting man free from men."
A savage works off impulse. His "reason" is his "need" as he determines it. He satisfies his needs through impulse and action. Think Aldus Huxley Brave New World.
A savage, by definition, does not employ reason. I don't see your implication at all. Tech. advancement results from freedom and productivity. Uncivilized societies do not cherish reason and freedom....
intrusion into our lives by other people; intrusion into our lives by government trying to compensate for human behavior; intrusion into our lives by advertisements and other media.
In which direction lies civilization? Choice? Or Intrusion?
Would a man with all the freedom to do whatever he wants short of infringing on the freedom of others be truly civilized?
Thanks, but I must then ask the question: what validity is there in the assumption that a savage can not enjoy the fruits of reason?
I think that the premise implied in the specific terms is fallacious: the implication that somehow one's lifestyle and environment are predicative of one's ability to employ reason rather than indicative, ie a cause rather than a result. Is it not societal structure and governance that indicate the level of individuality rather than their technological advancement?
I guess to me it is the lack of clarity employed in the argument that diminishes from its effectiveness.
Thanks. I found it on brainyquote when I was researching for the book I'm writing. I knew it sounded familiar but I couldn't place where I'd read it before.
Not really. In this world there is hardly a place to be born outside of a society nor are there many places to go to should you wish to leave one. Particularly in this time of technology almost all privacy is fleeting.
False premise. You do not need to sacrifice individuality to be part of society. You merely have to understand that if you want others to respect your rights you must respect their rights. In a proper society all relationships are voluntary.
Ok, but being part of any society means you give-up a certain amount of individuality and privacy just to conform to the standards set by the group. Sure they may not dictate every aspect of your life but just the same your individuality and privacy have been voluntarily sacrificed to be part of the group.
Many years ago, before any of us were born, wise men had a motto that has worked down through the centuries. It is easy to remember and was probably invented during the early days of this country. M.Y.O.B. Mind Your Own Business!
When people are free to do whatever they choose in the privacy of their homes or as private citizens without anyone interfering, especially government then shall people be truly free in society !
I think the NSA scandal makes this self evident. A true civilization is one where you are allowed to be your own person and not constrained by the rule and eyes of the majority.
Civilization allows for polite society, affording its denizens the freedom to be who they are without apology or explanation, therein the privacy aspect.
They are doing everything they can to demonize the truth teller who risked everything. And how many people are aware of snowmen and what he's done? Who's spying on the gov? Besides Edward?
Actually, I think pretty much everyone knows that at this point. Edward Snowden really let the cat out of the bag there. The NSA isn't a secret anymore.
The flip side of new technologies is that in addition to empowering the government to spy on citizens, they also empower citizens to spy on the government and fight back. There's a positive and a negative to everything.
Where did you get the quote? To me this means you can't be free without privacy OR being part of a tribe. The tribe will dictate. Freedom to choose who you want to associate with or not. Savages or the tribe or the collective will want control and it's easier done if they know everything about you. (I've had wine tonight so that's my disclaimer.)
Previous comments... You are currently on page 4.
I don't see your implication at all.
Tech. advancement results from freedom and productivity. Uncivilized societies do not cherish reason and freedom....
intrusion into our lives by other people;
intrusion into our lives by government trying to compensate for human behavior;
intrusion into our lives by advertisements and other media.
In which direction lies civilization?
Choice?
Or Intrusion?
Would a man with all the freedom to do whatever he wants short of infringing on the freedom of others be truly civilized?
Interesting quote. I tend to agree.
I think that the premise implied in the specific terms is fallacious: the implication that somehow one's lifestyle and environment are predicative of one's ability to employ reason rather than indicative, ie a cause rather than a result. Is it not societal structure and governance that indicate the level of individuality rather than their technological advancement?
I guess to me it is the lack of clarity employed in the argument that diminishes from its effectiveness.
"And Then There Were None" by Erick Frank Russell.
Read it; I'm sure you'll find it amusing.
There's a fatal flaw in the society presented, IMO. But, one of their favorite mottos is "MYOB".
Another is "F-IW!"
You have just stated the keystone to Objectivism, in my opinion.
"if you want others to respect your rights, you must respect their rights."
The flip side of new technologies is that in addition to empowering the government to spy on citizens, they also empower citizens to spy on the government and fight back. There's a positive and a negative to everything.