Major solar energy breakthrough

Posted by $ jbrenner 9 years, 11 months ago to Technology
11 comments | Share | Flag

I have been following solar energy since the mid-1980s. This is the most significant advance I have seen in the solar energy field during that time.

http://www.gizmag.com/four-junction-four...

Four-junction, four-terminal stacked solar cell hits 43.9 percent efficiency
By Darren Quick
April 30, 2014
7 Comments
3 Pictures

Arrays of stacked multi-junction cells achieving ultra high efficiencies were produced using a printing-based assembly process
Image Gallery (3 images)
The ultimate goal of solar cell technology is to be able to generate electricity at costs lower than sources such as coal, natural gas and nuclear. Key to this is continuing improvements in conversion efficiency, and with the development of the first four-junction, four-terminal stacked solar cell produced using a micro transfer printing process, researchers have taken another step towards this goal by achieving efficiencies of up to 43.9 percent, with the possibility of exceeding 50 percent in the near future.
The multilayer, microscale solar cell was created by North Carolina-based Semprius Inc. and California-based Solar Junction, working in collaboration with a team from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign led by Professor John Rogers. Using Semprius' proprietary high-speed micro transfer printing process high that it says is able to simultaneously produce thousands of stacked microcells with very high yields, the team stacked a triple-junction microcell on top of a single-junction microcell to create a four-junction, four-terminal stacked solar cell.
The team says the use of four junctions allows the stacked cell to capture a broader range of the solar spectrum, while the use of four terminals rather than the standard two increases the yield of the solar cell under normal operation in the field. Additionally, a new interfacial material that is placed between the top and bottom cells helps to optimize overall efficiency by minimizing optical losses within the stack.

The triple-junction solar cell is covered in an anti-reflective coating to ensure efficient transmission of light to the uppermost layers, while the bottom cell is a single-junction germanium microcell. Light with wavelengths between 300 and 1,300 nm is captured by the triple-junction cell, while light with wavelengths from 1,300 to 1,700 nm passes through to the germanium cell. The result is a multilayer, microscale solar cell that the team says outperforms conventional silicon and single-junction solar cell in terms of efficiency.
"The strategy involves high-speed, printing-based manipulation of thin, microscale solar cells and new interface materials to bond them into multilayer stacks,” Rogers said. "Quadruple-junction, four-terminal solar cells that we can build in this way have individually measured efficiencies of 43.9 percent."
However, Semprius, which was co-founded by Rogers in 2006 to commercialize ultrahigh efficiency photovoltaic modules, promises that the same process will be capable of achieving efficiencies exceeding 50 percent in the near future.
Like the 44.4 percent efficiency record reported by Sharp last year, the 43.9 percent efficiency figure was achieved using a lens system to concentrate light onto the solar cells. Using a dual-stage optics system, the incident sunlight was focused more than 1,000 times. Modules created from the microscale solar cells also achieved efficiencies of 36.5 percent under the same conditions.
"This is very nice work," stated Ali Javey, a professor of electrical engineering and computer sciences at the University of California, Berkeley, who wasn't involved in the research. "The results are impressive, and the schemes appear to provide a route to ultra-high efficiency photovoltaics, with strong potential for utility-scale power generation."
Rogers is first author of a paper detailing the new solar cell that is published this week in the journal Nature Materials.
Sources: Semprius, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
SOURCE URL: http://www.gizmag.com/four-junction-four-terminal-stacked-solar-cell/31868/?utm_source=Gizmag+Subscribers&utm_campaign=8e8ad0d51d-UA-2235360-4&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_65b67362bd-8e8ad0d51d-91018109


Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by hrymzk 9 years, 11 months ago

    jb
    Glad to see you maintain a fair-minded attitude about solar. After some of your previous comments.about solar capital costs
    And I'm sure solar will get more economical.
    We went from tubes to transistors in electronics.
    There's no end to our inventiveness

    Harry M
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ 9 years, 11 months ago
      The capital costs are very high for solar, but that collection efficiency is way beyond what is typically sold (5-10% collection efficiency normally vs. over 40% here). 20% is a key barrier for solar collection efficiencies.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Comment hidden by post owner or admin, or due to low comment or member score. View Comment
      • Posted by Hiraghm 9 years, 11 months ago
        I was thumbing through "The Complete Venus Equilateral" the other day, and in one of the stories there was a scene I'd forgotten where they were discussing efficiencies.

        One character pointed out the inefficiency of a lightbulb was terrible, as it put most of its energy out in heat... the other character pointed out that what they were after in this case WAS heat, therefore the lightbulb was 100% efficient.

        I need to read the whole story to get the context right, but I found that amusing.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by RobertFl 9 years, 11 months ago
    The only thing is, they're seeing 45% under lens/concentrators. What are they seeing without that? Current PV are ~25% efficient I believe, and their cost have come down a fair bit.

    About 15 years ago, I saw some promising work coming out of Germany (I think), where they were getting 85% effic, their only problem was the production yield was very low, hence costly. I haven't anything about that since.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by CircuitGuy 9 years, 11 months ago
    I don't follow solar, but isn't a big key getting the cost down rather than getting more efficiency? They say we'll get lower costs when there are fabs dedicated to processes optimized for solar rather than fabs geared toward ICs making solar cells.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ 9 years, 11 months ago
      Capital costs do tend to be very high for solar. You are correct, CircuitGuy. Unlike most of the other very efficient solar collection developments, this is much more scalable.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo