These "scientists" seem to forget the sun's influence on weather patterns. There has been various activities from Solar Flares and such that have been affecting the weather patterns over the earth's lifespan. If I find the article again about the NASA astrophysicist that had put out a report about the solar activity and the weather patterns, I will post it.

That's great! I missed that one as well. Thank you!

This sounds like something out of the State Science Institute. It would have come from Dr. Floyd Ferris. Robert Stadler was too much a shut-eye to write something like that.

Maybe the Biosphere near Tucson, AZ can be enlarged to hold all 7.5 billion people.

I'd suggest a great book by the late Michael Crichton called "State of Fear".

See Crichton was looking for the next great novel and thought - what could be better than an apocalyptic fiction? If' you've never read his books ("Jurassic Park", "Sphere", etc.), he's an assiduous researcher. So he started looking into the science behind man-made climate change to use the facts to supplement his book's premise. Then a funny thing happened. As he did more and more research, the answers he kept getting were exactly the opposite of what his story revolved around!

To his credit, he completely rewrote the book.

Yup, I didn't see that one come through in my email feed. Really like it though.

that's a fact.....if you get the book out, the news & the book MATCH......would be a great thesis for someone who has to write a paper for school!!

http://www.cato.org/blog/national-climat...

The evidence keeps getting stronger? What about the "pause" in warming that their dear models don't correctly predict?

Cyclical variations in weather patterns have been going on longer than man has walked this earth. Man has very little to do with it.

As I said before, we don't have proof. The evidence just keeps getting stronger though. I see it as time value of money problem in which we get streams of wealth generated now but risk large costs in the future. We can calculate the expected value of those costs (probability * cost of it happens) and then work out their present value. I don't know what the numbers are.

Everyday is another page straight out of AS.

you keep saying that and it' s projection. There is no statistical relevance for man made gw. We have given tons of stats tons of references and you ignore all of it. I deny that political bullshit. Show the proof.