LOL. Can't argue with that!!!

LOL

Wait until the Obama administration begins building more public housing in the suburbs for these "Justice Involved Individuals," and they begin committing crimes. Guess that they won't be prosecuted because they are not criminals.

This is what happens when you try to think and communicate like PC pinheads.

They would be bawling the word, "Unfair!" while lying there all bleedin' and dyin'
(Psst, I stole the last five words from what the bad boss said in "Open Range," a favorite Western).

I don't know. To me that sounds more like they are being injustly charged!!!

Besides manmade climate change deniers, I wonder if Lynching Loretta would also like to persecute if not openly prosecute all poppycocking Progressive partisans too.

One has to wonder what all these collegiate tender "snowflakes" would do if confronted with a "macro-aggression," such as being shot by some criminal in a "Gun-Free Zone?"

I'll call an ex-con an ex-con. I don't do political correctness.

Looks like they might try to shut me up to, as I think climate change is natural

It's the "fed up to here" sentiment about PC speech control that makes people gravitate to a figure like Donald Trump. Hateful epithets are one thing, and social disapproval should be the only weapon necessary to limit their use, but as the PC censorship becomes more ludicrous, with the birth of the term "microaggression," and such unfavored expressions creeping into the realm of indictable acts, there has to be an end to PC nonsense.

Poppycock. Progresive pandering, propagating potential partisans.

You just made me think of what the IRS does legally.
The EPA steals land legally.
Now the DOJ wants to "legally" shut down the free speech of man-made climate change deniers with civil actions. .

Call them politicians, The only difference is they do it legaly

LOL!

Aha! I suddenly feel enlightened over probable long term goal.

Better them than you.

That clears up your obvious.

Try saying THAT 3 times fast!! LOL Mr.A!

Scattering Roaches is what we DON'T WANT. (They have a NASTY habit of shitting everywhere)

Have you heard of how Australia deals with its economic migrants? We keep them in another COUNTRY while considering what to do with their claims.

I remember that Guantanamo was a good place for 'justice involved individuals'; time to make the precious little flowers we 'affectionately' call SJWs their new neighbours.

Nodju

Calling them "justice-involved individuals" makes it possible to restore their voting rights later, especially in Virginia.

I've always preferred to call them "Targets of Opportunity".