Benghazi emails point back to White House

Posted by $ blarman 7 years, 11 months ago to Politics
36 comments | Share | Flag

Now we all know that both the State Department under Hillary and the White House under Obama lied up and down about Benghazi, but now there are documents pointing to a carefully orchestrated plan to mislead the public.
SOURCE URL: http://freedomoutpost.com/benghazi-bombshell-newly-obtained-emails-point-past-state-dept-to-white-house-on-benghazi-lies/


Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by $ jbrenner 7 years, 11 months ago
    This is a surprise?
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ 7 years, 11 months ago
      Not really. The key is that now we have hard documentation.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by freedomforall 7 years, 11 months ago
        Anyone want to bet the AG decides it's not admissable or otherwise doesn't meet the standard and refuses to prosecute?
        Agents of the government act as judge on the guilt of government agents. Promotions and power are based on collusion, favortism, and corruption.
        It was not intended to work that way and it will not result in justice.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by $ 7 years, 11 months ago
          I would like to remain optimistic, but we don't know.

          In the end, it is all going to come down to Obama. There has already been a lot of media coverage of the issue. If they don't prosecute, I think it sends a message about government and tarnishes Obama's legacy even further. Bill Clinton has been lambasting Obama on the campaign trail, so Obama may want payback. There's no love lost between the Obamas and Clintons.

          On the other side, however, Obama does want to protect his legacy, and since most of his legacy was accomplished via Executive Actions instead of actual legislation, the next President can simply undo everything with a stroke of the pen and there's absolutely nothing Obama can do. He knows that the only way any of that survives is to have a Democrat in the White House.

          The last piece to throw in is FBI Director Comey, who by all reports is an honorable guy. FBI insiders have already leaked the fact that if the AG doesn't prosecute, they will leak all the evidence to the public, which might in the end be more damning - both to Hillary and Obama.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
          • Posted by $ allosaur 7 years, 11 months ago
            The evidence being leaked or not leaked to the public are the only foreseeable outcomes old dino can fathom.
            I knew Nixon and the Clintons were crooks, but I never imagined such blatant corruption before the Obama regime cane slithering along.
            Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by $ jbrenner 7 years, 11 months ago
        As if Susan Rice on five different networks wasn't enough hard evidence.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by $ 7 years, 11 months ago
          Yes, but what this confirms is that the State Department and White House both knew it was a false narrative and coordinated to perpetuate a false narrative.

          I think if I was the guy who made the video, I'd be pointing at this and taking the State Department and White House to court for about anything one can think of. And if he files the paperwork now, he stands a pretty good chance of no one in the court system moving on it until the next President (and Justice Department head) get put in office.

          And if we had anyone of conscience in the House, they would use this to immediately begin formal Impeachment hearings. It's highly unlikely, but in an ideal world, that is exactly what would happen.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by Herb7734 7 years, 11 months ago
    Did anyone in the Gulch doubt this for a moment?
    Since we now know it will likely be Trump VS Clinton, I hope Trump, unlike Romney, has the stones to use this kind of stuff against her. It should be crystal clear, that if she's not indicted that the voters know that she should be in jail.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ CBJ 7 years, 11 months ago
      Between this, the emails and Sanders' recent upset victory, it's possible that by convention time Hillary will be so weakened that she will not be the Democrat nominee. If faced with the likelihood of a Trump victory, many of her "superdelegates" might jump ship in favor of Sanders, Biden or someone else entirely.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ 7 years, 11 months ago
      I don't think anyone doubted it, but having the proof to put before a judge is key. Clinton has already wriggled out of of so many investigations it's literally criminal.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by Herb7734 7 years, 11 months ago
        I believe there is a documentary film coming out about the crookedness of the Clinton Foundation due to be released on the day of the democratic Convention. Should be interesting.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by evlwhtguy 7 years, 11 months ago
    As much as I hate the "wicked witch of the west" I really doubt we will ever see a prosecution. Yes she lied through her teeth....so did Obama....other than impeachment...I really don't see anything happening. I question whether it is even a crime for a politician to lie. Bottom line here.....the Obama justice department is not going to indite 1. Because it would smack of interfering with an election and 2. Because she has too much dirt on Obama. In the final analysis. Just as Dr. Ferris told Hank Reardon when Ferris wanted Hank to sell his steel to the state Science Institute. And Hank replied "if I do that I will break about ten of your laws" Faris replies "those laws don't matter for our friends" (or something like that, please excuse my guessing on the exact quote.) Bottom line here is there are different rules for people like Hillary and people like the rest of us.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by KevinSchwinkendorf 7 years, 11 months ago
    I saw the video in question when it was still on YouTube. Was it "disrespectful of Islam?" Well, yes, but Monte Python has been very disrespectful of Christianity, and nobody seems to care about that. I actually thought the video was funny, in the same style as Monte Python. But, I could only take MP in short bits, like the old "Flying Circus" shows (half an hour each). The longer movies (like Life of Brian, Meaning of Life") were too much in one sitting. Childish? Yes. Disrespectful? Yes. Cause for murdering 4 Americans? Hell No! But, of course, the video wasn't what initiated the attack in the first place, was it?
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ jdg 7 years, 11 months ago
      That topic was never anything but smoke and mirrors. It was never for one second plausible to anyone that the attack was a reaction to the film.

      We know that there were CIA agents in Benghazi to make an arms deal with the rebels who became ISIS. Kind of stupid for Obama and Hillary to try to paper over that public fact by letting the embassy staff die, but that's exactly what happened.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by KnowledgeisaBurden 7 years, 11 months ago
        Had to respond to the most relevant posting', benghazi WAS a GUN RUNNING PROGRAM! Ship loads of weapons were being delivered at the port, there were video documents showing this.... When barry stated 'arab spring' that was a coded message to RISE UP!!! for all this sprout in the spring, barry funded and supplied ISIS, destabilization of the mideast is the goal, that is why syria is in the sites' jordan is next, intel is avalable if folks just search and read.... Good for you jdg', dead men tell not the truth' that was the goal for all in the RENTED HOUSE (not embassey) to be silenced
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden by post owner or admin, or due to low comment or member score. View Comment
  • Posted by Mitch 7 years, 11 months ago
    Perfect, so now we have hard evidence for what we already knew. I think the bigger point is that these people that denied any wrong doing from the State Department and/or the White House have to eat crow. Clearly deception took place without a doubt, needs to be investigated, charges filed and impeachment proceedings started. Both the WH and the SD including the President and the Secretary of State have perpetrated in a cover-up. But unlike Nikon, people died…

    Nothing will come of it for three reasons, the head of the Department of Justice is a White House appointee, the news media isn’t news and the people are too dumb to care.

    I’m holding my breath until the election but I fell it is only to be let down.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by ProfChuck 7 years, 11 months ago
    All of the information regarding these events have been put into the Orwellian memory hole by the Obama administration and the history has been re-written.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by nicktheitguy 7 years, 11 months ago
    Did anyone else notice this is actually two year old news? The date on the original article that this references is April 29, 2014. Freedom Outpost reposted it, making it seem as if it is new news.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by IndianaGary 7 years, 11 months ago
    So, fast forward to 2017 when Donald Trump is sworn in as POTUS. What happens next? Could he afford to ignore the issue?
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ 7 years, 11 months ago
      IF (and it's a huge IF) Donald Trump becomes President, I believe he would press for Hillary's prosecution, but he would also have to get rid of Lynch (good riddance) before he could.

      I wouldn't count your chickens, however. Trump faces a huge uphill climb in the Electoral College - with no clear policy positions (aside from maybe Trade) with which to differentiate himself from Clinton. And while Trump fires up his base, he needs the entire Republican voting base to come out - and they're not going to do that. I see Trump going down in a defeat in the Generals the likes of which are rivaled only by Reagan v Carter.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Comment hidden by post owner or admin, or due to low comment or member score. View Comment
      • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 7 years, 11 months ago
        Once sworn in all it takes is a mandatory cabinet meeting and him to accept the pre signed letters of resignation already on file. About five minutes between clothes changes. His staff should have already figured out who to temporarily put in charge and what orders to issue. I's literally that simple. No need to Lynch Lynch just state lack of confidence and let it go at that. Have the FBI present it's case to date and then make a decision also have them checked for destroyed evidence.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Comment hidden by post owner or admin, or due to low comment or member score. View Comment
        • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 7 years, 11 months ago
          if the resignation letters are missing then a handwritten 'dismissed for lack of confidence in abilities.' will work or any number of other similar wordings. 'lack of trust' also serves to pull the security clearance. The only reason that is needed is as President I have a lack of confidence or trust in the ability of the individual. It's his cabinet at that point.

          He could do it over a cell phone two seconds after taking the oath if set up in advance.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo