Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by khalling 10 years, 10 months ago
    sounds like they're leaning toward a Bill Clinton interpretation
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by 10 years, 10 months ago
      hey, moral relativism. if it feels good, do it.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by khalling 10 years, 10 months ago
        ok, luken, I think I'm going to take you on in this. 1. if the business wants to offer happy endings and has demand, what should we care?
        2. this is exactly the kind of legislating morality stuff I find reduces liberty. like prohibition and the ATF. It's inefficient as well.
        3. The country has no right to make me a criminal because I exchanged sex for money or money for sex as long as we are consenting adults.
        4. only each individual can accurately assess the risks involved including relationship risks.
        5.why should the exchange of money and commercial location be immoral but sex in a private home without exchanging money moral?
        I just like to flush these things out, because legislating morality is a slippery slope in my opinion. :)
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by $ rockymountainpirate 10 years, 10 months ago
          Wouldn't giving it away for free be altruism?

          In high school another girl and I picked legalizing prostitution for a special assignment in government class. We both got an F
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
          • Posted by khalling 10 years, 10 months ago
            lol
            "Altruism declares that any action taken for the benefit of others is good, and any action taken for one’s own benefit is evil. Thus the beneficiary of an action is the only criterion of moral value—and so long as that beneficiary is anybody other than oneself, anything goes."
            I am stuck on action taken for one's benefit, would imply an exchange of value. "for free" would imply no exchange of value, so you correct. pity sex.
            Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo