VICTORY: Mexico Just Admitted Trump’s Won, Makes Humiliating Move to Save Face

Posted by $ Olduglycarl 7 years, 12 months ago to Culture
28 comments | Share | Flag

There’s no doubt that Mexico would like to blame Trump for its damaged reputation, but at the end of the day, it has been forced to admit that much of what Trump has said was right — an undoubtedly humiliating admission.

They're coming to DC to repair their image instead of stopping their own people from violating someone else's property and laws.
SOURCE URL: http://conservativetribune.com/mexico-admitted-trumps-won/


Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by khalling 7 years, 12 months ago
    how is coming to the US illegally a violation of property rights?
    2. They are breaking the law. I wonder how many "laws" you break daily that you don't even know about
    3. there are so many antiquated (from Spain) laws on the books in Mexico that the culture in Mexico is to stay under the radar and ignore many laws. It's getting more and more like that in the US from what I see.
    4. Objectivism rejects "us" vs "them" mentality
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ 7 years, 12 months ago
      They violate the property of America, of the land owners that are on the boarder, not to mention the property of the bodies of many.
      We can't have open boarders anywhere unless EVERYONE will naturally knock upon your door and ask to come in, respect the space on earth you've earned and paid for and respect your person....that may very well may take another 1000 years, provided we survive, provided we all grow up and all become "Conscious" human beings...right now...maybe only 1/2 of us are.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by khalling 7 years, 12 months ago
        there is no such concept as "the property of America" the govt should not own property. Only private property rights should be acknowledged. Trespass is a separate issue, but handled procedural-ly. Take that to the courts. "bodies of many" You mean Brian Tierry who was killed with a gun the ATF let "walk"? "respect the space on Earth"? what does this mean? being born in the US does not "earn you a damned thing except a tax bill in your future. "conscious human beings" all human beings are conscious by definition. They are rational. A starving mexican farmer is rational to get his family the heck out of a hellhole situation. .
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by Flootus5 7 years, 12 months ago
          However, The US Constitution does have a Property clause, and the Enclave clause acknowledges the property of the US government as being arsenals, forts, dockyards, etc for national defense.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by $ 7 years, 12 months ago
          Means respect MY/OUR individual property no matter where on earth...simple concept.
          Not government land...AMERICAN land...this is our country...if everyone in the world was honest, respectful, fully conscious with a conscience had mutuality with everyone, everyone on the same page...then countries would not need boarders.
          No...all humans are NOT conscious and if not conscious do not qualify as a "being"...they are only an entity. It's obvious, obobo, hiltery, sorass and 100,000's of others in the kakistocracy and in other countries are pagan bicameral barbaric, ignorant idiots.
          An if a mexican is in a hellhole...he still could ask to come in politely and assimilate into our culture, respect our laws and speak our language,,,no different than anyone else moving to a different country.
          Someday...far, far, off into the distant future...maybe we'll all grow up and be respectful. conscious, self ruling and be able to reason.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ Thoritsu 7 years, 12 months ago
      I agree in general. However, as long as we pay taxes to support various socialist government features, some necessary, those who seek these features without contributing are looters. That is the valid objection. Not taking jobs away from those who refuse to do them for a reasonable wage.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by mccannon01 7 years, 12 months ago
      "I wonder how many "laws" you break daily that you don't even know about" - Irrelevant. If I unknowingly break law X it has nothing to do with you deliberately and knowingly breaking law Y.

      "there are so many antiquated (from Spain) laws..." - Also irrelevant to the USA. This is Mexico's problem. The fact that the USA is going down the same road is OUR problem, not Mexico's.

      "Objectivism rejects "us" vs "them" mentality" - Sounds good on paper, but in real life you have to deal with real problems. In AS the Gulch was hidden and protected to keep looters and moochers (presumably them) out so the strikers (presumably us) wouldn't get raided and overrun. Gulch entry was by invitation only, which is even more stringent than lining up and applying for legal entry to the USA.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by khalling 7 years, 12 months ago
        your pragmatic approach has merit-however, why do so many focus on immigration and it is crickets on welfare state? be pragmatic about THAT
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by johnpe1 7 years, 12 months ago
          K, the simple fact that our national success results in
          looters and moochers being attracted here ... does
          not sanction their supplanting our citizens in the
          competition for life, against our laws. . I do not allow
          just anyone into my home and care for them. -- j
          .
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by mccannon01 7 years, 12 months ago
          Oh, you mean the giant Welfare State free-stuff-magnet sucking sound? No crickets from me on that. Zero benefits for illegal aliens, but I do believe they should be treated humanely as they are deported. Need to say bye-bye to the "anchor baby" concept as well when the child is of illegal alien parentage. Now, THAT should remove the giant Welfare State free-stuff-magnet as pertains to illegal aliens making that argument moot. Pragmatic enough?

          As for addressing the giant Welfare State for actual citizens, that's a subject of another thread.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Comment hidden by post owner or admin, or due to low comment or member score. View Comment
      • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 7 years, 12 months ago
        when I read or hear someone saying' you have to' my immediate response is 'no I don't.' You live in your dream world of pragmatism i live in a real world that is practical and useful. If you are stuck in the rut as described you are not in the 'real world.' Back to your TV.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by mccannon01 7 years, 12 months ago
          I see this statement in reply to my post. What is its relevance? Or was it supposed to reply to something else? What is this "you have to" you are referring to, and what "rut" are you referring to?
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
          • Comment hidden by post owner or admin, or due to low comment or member score. View Comment
          • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 7 years, 12 months ago
            That's how far pragmatism will get you...only through the moment. Then you can say 'why back in the moment.etc.'

            It's not very practical though but then that's why reframing was invented.
            Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by CircuitGuy 7 years, 12 months ago
      Yes, to all of that!
      " culture in Mexico is to stay under the radar and ignore many laws."
      You can insert most places in the world for "Mexico". The law degenerates into laws made to be broken and serve as a justification for why the gov't is messing with someone who's out of favor with gov't officials.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by Herb7734 7 years, 12 months ago
    How about repairing their image by working to stop the illegal border crossings? A PR effort. In this case it's like giving a glass of water to someone who is seriously bleeding. A nice gesture that doesn't solve the problem.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ jdg 7 years, 12 months ago
      Exactly. Half of all illegals came in legally and simply overstayed their visas. A wall won't do anything to stop them.

      If I wanted to stop people coming in that way, I would make everyone show their papers as they leave the US. That way the government would at least know who has overstayed their visas, so they won't just get issued new ones when they feel like coming back a second or third time. Right now DHS doesn't even collect that information, so it's easy to repeat the process of "get a tourist visa and overstay it" multiple times.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ allosaur 7 years, 12 months ago
    So Mexico thinks it has a PR problem that requires a diplomatic solution.
    Yeah, right.
    Me dino would only want to talk to that diplomat about how Mexico handles its own southern border. Until the man screamed. And even then I would refuse to change the subject.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden by post owner or admin, or due to low comment or member score. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 7 years, 12 months ago
    What did he win? Last I heard the rules committee is getting set to strip all the delegates based on winner takes all. I'll have to read the comments to find out what's it all about Alfie
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by term2 7 years, 12 months ago
    The government of Mexico is indeed bad. They stand by their policies while millions of their own citizens flee to survive over here. It should be a serious message to their government to get out of the way and let the people there make their own lives better.

    I had a plant there about 10 years ago, the taxes on people making more than the minimum wage were upwards of 60%. It didnt pay for people to better themselves over and above minimum wages. If we had to hire people worth more than the minimum wage, they got an addtional identity and we made out two checks on payday, each for the minimum wage. Pretty stupid.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo