How I discovered Ayn Rand and Objectivism – My personal story

Posted by Maphesdus 11 years ago to Philosophy
308 comments | Share | Best of... | Flag

It's difficult to say for certain when I was first introduced to Ayn Rand. For the longest time, “Atlas Shrugged” had always been one of those famous literary works, like “To Kill a Mockingbird” or “Catcher in the Rye,” which I knew were considered classics, but which I had never read and didn't know much about. Ayn Rand's magnum opus was among these, and it sort floated around in my subconscious, just below the level of awareness; existing, but in a state which was incorporeal and insubstantial.

One day, I was watching an episode of South Park titled “Chickenlover,” in which the character Officer Barbrady reveals that he is illiterate, but subsequently learns to read, and then reads “Atlas Shrugged” and decides never to read again because of it. This little cameo nudged “Atlas Shrugged” into my consciousness a bit more, and made me decide that perhaps maybe I wanted to possibly read it someday. I didn't know what the story was even about, but if it was getting made fun of on South Park, it had to be kind of a big deal, right? So I made a mental goal to eventually read “Atlas Shrugged” at some unspecified point in the indeterminate future. Then I went about my regular life as usual and soon forgot about it.

In 2009, I took a summer-sales job selling home security systems door-to-door. The company was sending sales-reps out of state, so I got to visit a part of the country I had never been to before. On the way there, during a layover between flights (tickets paid for by the company), I decided to browse the used book store at the airport. On one shelf there happened to be an old hardcover copy of “Atlas Shurgged.” I eagerly picked it up and read the brief synopsis on the back cover, which gave me a glimpse into a world on the brink of economic collapse. It sounded intriguing, and so I began flipping through the pages. Being somewhat impatient, I flipped towards the back of the book to see what state the world would end up in. Had the characters in the book solved the economic problems of their society? Had things fallen apart completely? What did their world look like? By pure chance, I happened to land on what turned out to be one of the most memorable exchanges of dialogue in the entire book:

––––––––––––––––––––––
“Okay, I'll tell you. You want me to be Economic Dictator?”
“Yes!”
“And you'll obey any order I give?”
“Implicitly!”
“Then start by abolishing all income taxes.”
“Oh no!” screamed Mr. Thompson, leaping to his feet. “We couldn't do that! That's . . . that's not the field of production. That's the field of distribution. How would we pay government employees?"
“Fire your government employees.”
“Oh, no! That's politics! That's not economics! You can't interfere with politics! You can't have everything!”
––––––––––––––––––––––

So... this was a novel about politics and economics? I smiled. This was in May of 2009, and the country was still feeling the effects of the 2008 financial crisis, so the story felt absolutely relevant to the current times. Unfortunately, I was flat broke, and didn't want to spend what little cash I had on a book, even if it did look like it would be a really good one. Looking at my watch, I realized my next plane was going to be departing soon, and I had only about ten minutes or so to get to the terminal. So I put “Atlas Shrugged” back on the shelf and walked out of the bookstore. It would be another three years before I finally picked it up again.

I spent that summer involved in what I had initially thought was going to be just another job to pay the bills, but which, looking back, I now realize taught me some very important life lessons. It was the first sales job I had ever had, and it gave me a totally new perspective on salesmen, business, and money. I admit I didn't do particularly well at the job, as I've always been an extremely shy and introverted person, and had a habit of being a bit submissive (when you're a salesman, these are not good personality traits to have).

Of course I wasn't the only one who was struggling. Many of the other sales reps also found they had significant difficulty in persuading people to buy our product. Taking note of our struggles, our team leader (who had done extremely well with sales in summers past) introduced us to a book which he said would help us overcome our weaknesses. That book was called “The Psychology of Selling,” by Brian Tracy. I didn't know it yet, but this book was going to have a profound impact on my life and my perspective on business and money. It was the first time in my life that I had ever read any self-help book, or any book that dealt directly with the issues of money, sales, and business. It was amazing. Although I admit my skills as a salesman didn't improve much, Brian Tracy's book started me on a journey of financial discovery, a quest to discover the inner workings of business, finance, and eventually, economics.

Following that summer, I started to develop a keen interest in money matters, and I began to actively seek out other self-help books on the subject. Over the next couple of years, I delved into various books like “Rich Dad, Poor Dad,” by Robert Kiyosaki, “Super Rich,” by Russell Simmons, “Think and Grow Rich,” and “The Law of Success,” both by Napoleon Hill, and “How to Win Friends & Influence People,” by Dale Carnegie, along with several others. Combined, these books taught me to think about business and money in a totally new light. They taught me that rather than slaving away for a paycheck at some mindless dead-end job where I would have little control over my own life, I could choose a different path – I could choose freedom. These books taught me that personal success, economic prosperity, and true financial independence were simply a matter of having the proper mindset, of understanding how to create and build real value. I still had not yet read “Atlas Shrugged,” but these other books had established in me a value system based on the principles of independence, personal responsibility, humility, productivity, and financial freedom. I was beginning to think like an entrepreneur.

[CONTINUED IN COMMENTS]


All Comments


Previous comments...   You are currently on page 12.
  • Posted by jimslag 11 years ago
    I agree with iroseland about the civil rights act, but we are also seeing it in current legislation about LGBT rights and how it is protecting one group while affecting another, larger group in Christians. Again it is causing people to be grouped and to be antagonistic against each other. I am gladly, a heterosexual male, but I have lots of friends who are part of the LGBT group. We are friends on the basis that I am who I am and they are who they are. We do not not try to convert each other into one way life or the other. We got along great until the administrations latest efforts. Now with all the lawsuits against people who stand on their beliefs has come forth, I have noted a more militaristic attitude that they try to find things where they can claim discrimination and file lawsuits. Not necessarily my friends but others that they associate with. I am a firm believer that you are free to associate with whomever you please to, that is one of our rights that the government keeps trying to take away. But again, it is government putting us in groups and putting us against each other. Race first, then economics, now gender and sexuality. The progressives definitely like those groups.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by khalling 11 years ago in reply to this comment.
    Notice how all of these equalrights acts came about fast and furiously after the passage of the civil rights act. The cocept of equal opportunity is absurd.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by Robbie53024 11 years ago in reply to this comment.
    If you look at the inner city schools they are more segregated now than they were in the 60's/70's as a direct consequence of "desegregation." So, in order to achieve better integration, we need to stop "desegregationist" policies. Comes from the law of unintended consequences. As that great philosopher Princess Leia said to Grand Moff Tarkin, "The tighter you grip the more they will slip through your fingers." And the more stringent have been the desegregation policies, the more those who could do so have fled the cities.

    So, no, if what you want to achieve is more integration then what you need to do is stop desegregation. Like I said before, you need to live a bit more of life in order to see the world as it truly is instead of how you would like it to be.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by Robbie53024 11 years ago in reply to this comment.
    The Goal by Eli Goldratt: A novelized business book about how to identify the constraint in your business and what to do about it. You'll love Herbie.
    Six Sigma by Richard Schroeder and some other hack: Once you've identified your source of unacceptable variation, here's the foolproof way to achieve breakthrough improvements.
    The Tao of Pooh by Ben Hoff: While not a business process book per se, it offers insights in to people and life which are helpful in all aspects of life including business.
    Oh, and I'd be remiss if I forgot Necessary but not Sufficient by Eli Goldratt: For anyone looking to implement SAP - read this book first and you'll understand why an ERP is necessary, but not sufficient to improve your business. While it doesn't specifically state this is about SAP, I've been through enough implementations to see that it was clearly meant with them in mind.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by 11 years ago in reply to this comment.
    The advice depends on the person. Some people, if they're irresponsible and incapable of doing what you said, probably would be better off just getting rid of their credit cards entirely. Your suggestion is the wiser course of action, and has superior results in the long term, but it requires a higher level of discipline and self-control, which not everyone has.

    (By the way, your suggestion is essentially identical to what Robert Kiyosaki advises in his books.)
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by 11 years ago in reply to this comment.
    Not at all. Teamwork is the most effective way to accomplish almost any goal. Acting alone allows one to accomplish only so much. Acting together allows all the entire group to achieve much greater heights.

    Which is more profitable? A small mom and pop grocery store that has only one location, or a huge national chain like Wal-Mart? The answer shouldn't be that difficult to figure out...
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Zenphamy 11 years ago in reply to this comment.
    When you begin feeling as and acting as a group, you become an animal and have given up your primary advantage in life, a mind that can reason.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • -2
    Posted by 11 years ago in reply to this comment.
    I was with you up until the point where you said environmentalists want to destroy humanity, and that it's therefore perfectly rational to refuse to associate with them. The idea that environmentalism is bad and evil is just absurd. Also, business transactions do not qualify as associations. Besides, it's totally within the proper sphere of government authority to ensure that employers do not abuse their employees. The purpose of government is to protect people from each other, and sometimes employees need protection against their employers. There is nothing wrong with that. This whole line of reasoning just goes right back to whether or not government has the authority to impose regulations on business, to which I say, yes, absolutely it does. Regulation is not anti-capitalism.

    Oh, and no, the Civil Rights Act does NOT require you to hire an equal number of men and women. That's a quota system, and the CRA does not impose any quotas.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by 11 years ago in reply to this comment.
    Uh... I don't think you understand what the word "desegregation" means. If people are being forced to group only with those who are like themselves, that's segregation. If we undo that and put a stop to it, then that's desegregation.

    Essentially you just said that desegregation stops desegregation, which doesn't make any sense. Desegregation does not stop itself. How can engaging in an action stop that action?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by Robbie53024 11 years ago in reply to this comment.
    Actually, under your perspective, you DO want to stop desegregation. Most people naturally group themselves with those like them. You would have this undone by use of force.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by Robbie53024 11 years ago in reply to this comment.
    Dave Ramsey is too simplistic. Destroy your credit cards - what hogwash, instead get as high a credit limit as you can, charge no more than 25% of that limit per month, and PAY IT OFF. You'll increase your credit score, and if you have a card like mine, get a great refund at the end of the year without paying any interest (since I travel extensively I get nearly $2000 each year in free cash).
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by dbhalling 11 years ago in reply to this comment.
    Sorry you are right I meant stop segregation.

    There is a difference between what is right at the governmental level and what is right on an ethical level. The government's job is to protect your natural rights, including your right to free association - meaning you (private citizen) can associate or not associate with anyone you want to and the government cannot force you to associate with anyone. However, the government does not have a right to free association, it must treat everyone the same under to the law.

    Ethically, it is irrational to turn away good customers, employees, etc because they are not the right religion, sex, race, etc. However, it is not irrational for me to not associated with terrorists, socialists, environmentalists and others that want to destroy humanity.

    The CRA clearly requires that I work with people I may not want to. For instance, it requires I hire and equal number of men and women even if they are not equally qualified. There are not as many qualified female engineers and male engineers. It just makes sense that if I have an engineering company, I will have more male employees as engineers. As a result, the males will be promoted more than the females - its an engineering company. If I run a company selling christian trinkets it is absurd to force me to hire muslims, jews, or atheists. And that is what the CRA does and it definitely violates my free association and it is evil and its result has been to divide people into pressure groups looking for ever greater legal privileges and goodies.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by 11 years ago in reply to this comment.
    I think you mean stop segregation, not stop desegregation. We don't want to stop desegregation.

    Also, the Civil Rights Act didn't inhibit freedom of association in any way.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by 11 years ago in reply to this comment.
    "Drive - It's about motivating employees."
    ----
    Are you referring to "Drive: The Surprising Truth About What Motivates Us," by Daniel H. Pink? If so, that's a good book, too, and is another example of a genuine businessman saying something that contradicts Ayn Rand, as Dan Pink said money isn't actually very good as a motivator for most people.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u6XAPnuF...

    Anyway, thanks for the list. :)
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by dbhalling 11 years ago in reply to this comment.
    The one led to the other. I can decide who I want to associate with the government cannot. The Civil Right Act turned that on its head. It is not about freedom, it is about using the power of government to limit people's freedom.

    The CRA was not necessary to stop desegregation in public places, all that was necessary was what you pointed to in your post "equal under the law."
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by 11 years ago in reply to this comment.
    I was talking about the Civil Rights Act, not affirmative action. Don't try to pull a bait and switch on me here. Let's keep the the focus of the discussion consistent, okay? A = A
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by 11 years ago in reply to this comment.
    Ayn Rand often wrote about how to interact and deal with other people, which is something that's very applicable to the world of business. And the advice she gave is often in direct conflict with the things actual businessmen have said.

    For example:

    "Successful people are always looking for ways to help others. Unsuccessful people are always asking, 'What's in it for me?'"
    ~ Brian Tracy

    http://www.galtsgulchonline.com/posts/1b...
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by 11 years ago in reply to this comment.
    Actually, I don't think it's a good idea to only ever look at individuals, as doing so inevitably blinds a person to the way groups operate and interact with each other in society. Judging people by their individual merit is always a good thing, but at the same time, saying that there is no such thing as groups is a denial of reality. Reductionism is important, but so is holism.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by dbhalling 11 years ago in reply to this comment.
    You can disagree all you want, but it is a fact. Affirmative action is a special legal privilege that only applies to certain people.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • -1
    Posted by 11 years ago in reply to this comment.
    I disagree with the sentiment that the Civil Rights Act constituted "special privileges," and I find such a political position to be absolutely abhorrent. Sorry if that sounds a bit harsh, but that's where I stand.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by CircuitGuy 11 years ago
    Business books:
    Financial Peace: Restoring Financial Hope to You and Your Family by Dave Ramsey - This is my favorite book on personal finance. I read some later ones by him, but they weren't as good. In this one he's still somewhat fresh out of bankruptcy and I could feel the emotion of him having been knocked on his bottom and having climbed out of it by hard work.
    Rich Dad, Poor Dad - I did not care for this book. It had a lot of needless dialog and an almost supernatural suggestion that owning a business solves all problems.
    The Innovators Dilemma and The Innovator's Solution - My favorite books. They tell the story of constant commoditization / de-commoditization
    The Lean Startup - Talks about how in the past we knew what wanted to produce and had to find efficient ways to produce it. Now the challenge is to work out what to produce.
    The Long Tail - It's about how we can sell to niche markets products that would not justify shelf space at a national chain.
    Drive - It's about motivating employees.
    The Better Angles of Our Nature - Not a business book, but the positive outlook toward the arc of human history is nice-- maybe helpful in business.
    Linchpin - It's by Seth Godin. I liked it better than his most famous book Tribes.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by CircuitGuy 11 years ago
    Thank you for sharing your story. I agree AS is not a manual for business. What I take away from it is that everyone owns their own lives must should explore it for themselves and never live for others' approval, reaction, attention, respect, etc. It shows how people following what they personally understand to be right and seeking their own wants powers the world. People arguing you must set aside your own thoughts, beliefs, wants for a greater cause are a threat to the world. We should trust that each of us finding our own way, without pressure from human institutions telling us what to think, will lead to a positive outcome. Some people who ask us to conform do it for their own needs. Maybe someone hurt them, and they are threatened by success. Maybe deep down they feel some inadequacy and they want to be sure everyone's inadequate too. Rand condemns this behavior. She says we should leave each other alone and only interact in fair exchanges that all parties in the exchange agree to. The other choice is do interact with people out of guilt, and that leads to a path of people using force on one another, which leads to an environment in which humanity does not thrive.
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo