How I discovered Ayn Rand and Objectivism – My personal story

Posted by Maphesdus 11 years ago to Philosophy
308 comments | Share | Best of... | Flag

It's difficult to say for certain when I was first introduced to Ayn Rand. For the longest time, “Atlas Shrugged” had always been one of those famous literary works, like “To Kill a Mockingbird” or “Catcher in the Rye,” which I knew were considered classics, but which I had never read and didn't know much about. Ayn Rand's magnum opus was among these, and it sort floated around in my subconscious, just below the level of awareness; existing, but in a state which was incorporeal and insubstantial.

One day, I was watching an episode of South Park titled “Chickenlover,” in which the character Officer Barbrady reveals that he is illiterate, but subsequently learns to read, and then reads “Atlas Shrugged” and decides never to read again because of it. This little cameo nudged “Atlas Shrugged” into my consciousness a bit more, and made me decide that perhaps maybe I wanted to possibly read it someday. I didn't know what the story was even about, but if it was getting made fun of on South Park, it had to be kind of a big deal, right? So I made a mental goal to eventually read “Atlas Shrugged” at some unspecified point in the indeterminate future. Then I went about my regular life as usual and soon forgot about it.

In 2009, I took a summer-sales job selling home security systems door-to-door. The company was sending sales-reps out of state, so I got to visit a part of the country I had never been to before. On the way there, during a layover between flights (tickets paid for by the company), I decided to browse the used book store at the airport. On one shelf there happened to be an old hardcover copy of “Atlas Shurgged.” I eagerly picked it up and read the brief synopsis on the back cover, which gave me a glimpse into a world on the brink of economic collapse. It sounded intriguing, and so I began flipping through the pages. Being somewhat impatient, I flipped towards the back of the book to see what state the world would end up in. Had the characters in the book solved the economic problems of their society? Had things fallen apart completely? What did their world look like? By pure chance, I happened to land on what turned out to be one of the most memorable exchanges of dialogue in the entire book:

––––––––––––––––––––––
“Okay, I'll tell you. You want me to be Economic Dictator?”
“Yes!”
“And you'll obey any order I give?”
“Implicitly!”
“Then start by abolishing all income taxes.”
“Oh no!” screamed Mr. Thompson, leaping to his feet. “We couldn't do that! That's . . . that's not the field of production. That's the field of distribution. How would we pay government employees?"
“Fire your government employees.”
“Oh, no! That's politics! That's not economics! You can't interfere with politics! You can't have everything!”
––––––––––––––––––––––

So... this was a novel about politics and economics? I smiled. This was in May of 2009, and the country was still feeling the effects of the 2008 financial crisis, so the story felt absolutely relevant to the current times. Unfortunately, I was flat broke, and didn't want to spend what little cash I had on a book, even if it did look like it would be a really good one. Looking at my watch, I realized my next plane was going to be departing soon, and I had only about ten minutes or so to get to the terminal. So I put “Atlas Shrugged” back on the shelf and walked out of the bookstore. It would be another three years before I finally picked it up again.

I spent that summer involved in what I had initially thought was going to be just another job to pay the bills, but which, looking back, I now realize taught me some very important life lessons. It was the first sales job I had ever had, and it gave me a totally new perspective on salesmen, business, and money. I admit I didn't do particularly well at the job, as I've always been an extremely shy and introverted person, and had a habit of being a bit submissive (when you're a salesman, these are not good personality traits to have).

Of course I wasn't the only one who was struggling. Many of the other sales reps also found they had significant difficulty in persuading people to buy our product. Taking note of our struggles, our team leader (who had done extremely well with sales in summers past) introduced us to a book which he said would help us overcome our weaknesses. That book was called “The Psychology of Selling,” by Brian Tracy. I didn't know it yet, but this book was going to have a profound impact on my life and my perspective on business and money. It was the first time in my life that I had ever read any self-help book, or any book that dealt directly with the issues of money, sales, and business. It was amazing. Although I admit my skills as a salesman didn't improve much, Brian Tracy's book started me on a journey of financial discovery, a quest to discover the inner workings of business, finance, and eventually, economics.

Following that summer, I started to develop a keen interest in money matters, and I began to actively seek out other self-help books on the subject. Over the next couple of years, I delved into various books like “Rich Dad, Poor Dad,” by Robert Kiyosaki, “Super Rich,” by Russell Simmons, “Think and Grow Rich,” and “The Law of Success,” both by Napoleon Hill, and “How to Win Friends & Influence People,” by Dale Carnegie, along with several others. Combined, these books taught me to think about business and money in a totally new light. They taught me that rather than slaving away for a paycheck at some mindless dead-end job where I would have little control over my own life, I could choose a different path – I could choose freedom. These books taught me that personal success, economic prosperity, and true financial independence were simply a matter of having the proper mindset, of understanding how to create and build real value. I still had not yet read “Atlas Shrugged,” but these other books had established in me a value system based on the principles of independence, personal responsibility, humility, productivity, and financial freedom. I was beginning to think like an entrepreneur.

[CONTINUED IN COMMENTS]


All Comments


Previous comments...   You are currently on page 7.
  • Posted by ewv 11 years ago in reply to this comment.
    You were not asked about the difference between a book and an audio-book. You were asked if you read Atlas Shrugged because in your long post entitled "How I discovered Ayn Rand and Objectivism – My personal story" you somehow neglected to mention whether you had ever actually read the book, and because in your stream of trashing Ayn Rand you reveal an obvious ignorance of and lack of concern for what she wrote.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by LetsShrug 11 years ago in reply to this comment.
    What about your private property? If I want to wire MY house all wrong it's MY risk and no one's business.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by ewv 11 years ago in reply to this comment.
    Ayn Rand knew that the antidote necessary to oppose racism and other forms of collectivism is an individualist philosophy of reason, not more political impositions of statism and collectivism such as overtly racist policies of forced associations through racial herding, quotas, and 'affirmative action' based on race. She knew that fundamental ideas drive a culture, and that, contrary to the anti-intellectuals, ideas cannot be either imposed or opposed by government force. One does not protect the rights of the individual by trampling them, but the progressives are not concerned with the rights of the individual.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • -1
    Posted by 11 years ago in reply to this comment.
    I will assert that I have a natural right to not have to worry about buildings collapsing on my head or falling through sidewalks due to shoddy construction work.

    Here's a video of a girl literally falling through a sidewalk in China because the construction regulations over there weren't strict enough:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tw156fND...

    Do you honestly want to have to worry about that sort of thing in the U.S.? I don't.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by 11 years ago in reply to this comment.
    Personally, I don't really like the terms "over regulation" and "under regulation," because they create this dichotomy where we start asking how much regulation do we need, and how much is too much, when really that's not the issue at all. It isn't a matter of having too much or too little regulation, but rather a matter of having the RIGHT regulation.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by ewv 11 years ago in reply to this comment.
    I did not mention politics in the post you responded to, let alone focus on it. You can discuss or not discuss anything you like, but I wouldn't say you don't belong here..

    I don't agree that almost all people are intellectually dishonest, but there are certainly trolls stalking about as agitators deliberately trying to be disruptive, and they certainly are intellectually dishonest. I don't know who this Maphesdus is and where else it posts, though your observation is interesting, but you can see from its posts in this forum alone that it has a record of supporting progressive propaganda and trashing Ayn Rand and individualism, so on those grounds alone your suspicions are warranted. Whatever Maphesdus is, I agree that it would be a waste of time to attempt to educate it, but that is not the only purpose of posting responses to trolls. This one in particular has revealed itself to be in way over its head, having a very poor understanding of Ayn Rand and relying on off the wall slogans, bogus misrepresentations from fringe detractors to spread its poison, and a pretentious, condescending, pseudo intellectual manner talking down at anyone who opposes it -- all trying to undermine anyone who might take Ayn Rand's ideas seriously. Like most such trolls, it has little understanding but a practiced technique of evasiveness for trying to throw its enemies off balance with irrelevant diversions and sudden pretense at concern for precision and objectivity. There is a reason to sometimes respond to a troll, but not to follow it down every evasive rabbit hole.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by 11 years ago in reply to this comment.
    So essentially you're saying that it's impossible for employers to harm their employees, based on the premise that employees always have the ability to quit if they don't like the way they're being treated?

    Well that's just shoddy reasoning...
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by 11 years ago in reply to this comment.
    I think the point of equal rights is to try and obtain equal treatment within society, not necessarily to establish equal opportunity.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • -1
    Posted by 11 years ago in reply to this comment.
    Leaders? Are you implying that "environmentalism" is some kind of singular, unified group with an organized, hierarchical structure? Cuz' I was operating under the assumption that it was just an abstract concept.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by ewv 11 years ago in reply to this comment.
    She denounced promoting racism in the name of opposing racism. Her rejection of your leftist dogma does not make her "inconsistent".
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by 11 years ago in reply to this comment.
    I've actually seen that site before, and read through most of it. Although I think John T. Reed does bring up some legitimate criticisms, he also brings up some faulty ones, such as complaining about Robert Kiyosaki's imprecise and inconsistent wording. Seriously, who cares if Robert Kiyosaki changes his mind about who the number one influence in his life has been? Then there are some criticisms that actually just make John Reed look like an ass, such as his bringing up the fact that Robert Kiyosaki used to be fat, or that Robert went by the name Bob when he was younger (which is actually incredibly common for people named Robert to do). John Reed raises some good points, but he raises a lot of bad ones, too.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by 11 years ago in reply to this comment.
    That's the war on poverty, not the Civil Rights Act.

    If you want to say that the war on poverty has had negative effects, despite it's good intentions, you may have a legitimate argument. However, that's still something entirely separate from the Civil Rights Act.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • -1
    Posted by 11 years ago in reply to this comment.
    Look, maybe you're not aware of it, but you are in fact expressing yourself in very vague and confusing terms. It's not just me; dbhalling was confused, too. Seriously, you need to work on your communication skills, because the things you say just don't make any sense. Maybe you did answer my question, and maybe you didn't. I can't tell. You've buried your message under so much technical jargon that I can't make any sense of it.

    If Stephen Hawking can explain the basic principles behind astrophysics in a way that anyone can understand, then surely you can find a way to clearly explain whatever it is you're trying to say.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by LetsShrug 11 years ago in reply to this comment.
    You'd be lost WITH a compass. As a matter of fact you would probably accuse the compass of being a bigot, and of persecution.
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo