"has the fewest ideas, right or wrong. It’s certainly a commentary on elite education."

I call them "ANTI" lectuals....

Nice article, had me right up until the part about Clinton supporters being the most educated. If you ask me, Clinton supporters are the most ignorant, otherwise they'd have to all be the most unethical or most sexist, or something other than the most educated. For me, I'm not looking at the campaigns either. That is a show, and let's face it, candidates say anything that moves them up in the polls. I look at the productive achievement of the candidates. That which Rand says is Man's noblest purpose. A man's soul is reflected by his works, and with that, any educated person, wishing to make a choice, has an easy one to make, and hint, hint, it sure as hell isn't a career politician mired in scandal, deception, theft, and worse a la Hilary Clinton. I have die hard Clinton supporting friends and relatives who say "we must go with who has the most experience" as their car sits in the driveway with a campaign sticker of a community organizer who hadn't ever done squat except be black and tell some really big lies. No, Clinton supporters are not, as the sweeping generalization suggests, the most educated. Far from it. As for not voting... Why wouldn't you vote? If this is our choice, three political frauds and a loose lipped self absorbed business man, why not cast that vote and turn the lights off on the world? If you have no better choice then give the moochers what they ask for, then let them eat cake.

Am I happy. Not at all. His description of the candidates is one of the reasons I will not be wasting my time voting.