ABC Refers to Chelsea Clinton's Pregnancy as American "Royal" Baby

Posted by Eudaimonia 11 years, 8 months ago to Politics
58 comments | Share | Flag

“One of the strongest natural proofs of the folly of hereditary right in kings is, that nature disapproves it otherwise she would not so frequently turn it into ridicule by giving mankind an ass in place of a lion” - Thomas Paine "Common Sense"

And now consider if the parents were asses in the first place.

Enough of American royals!
Enough of their sycophantic court of "Journalists"!

All Comments

Previous comments...   You are currently on page 3.
  • Posted by straightlinelogic 11 years, 8 months ago
    Didn't we learn a long time ago that the best thing to do with royalists was to behead them?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Sgtill 11 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    We have already had a Bush baby, and had no fanfare declaring that the royal princess was expecting. Liberal are just full of it up to their eyebrows.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Sgtill 11 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    To make things worse, you have the Obamas and the Clintons who have aspirations of being monarchs.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Your_Name_Goes_Here 11 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    No, the only time you see glowing praise like this is the liberal media (aka the mainstream press) about a liberal personality.

    Next, ABC will be speculating on the second coming since the due date is likely to be near Christmas.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Eudaimonia 11 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Except, at least one of the Bush daughters has already had a child and there was no similar coverage.
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo