Pragmatist Trump

Posted by $ TomB666 9 years, 1 month ago to Politics
154 comments | Share | Best of... | Flag

This article gives a little different take to Donald Trump.

Mychal S. Massie is an ordained minister who spent 13 years in full-time Christian Ministry. Today he serves as founder and Chairman of the Racial Policy Center (RPC), a think tank he officially founded in September 2015.

RPC advocates for a colorblind society. He was founder and president of the non-profit “In His Name Ministries”. He is the former National Chairman of the conservative black think tank, Project 21-The National Leadership Network of Black Conservatives and a former member of its parent think tank, the National Center for Public Policy Research.

Trump is not a liberal or conservative, he’s a Pragmatist.

We recently enjoyed a belated holiday dinner with friends at the home of other friends. The dinner conversation was jocund, ranging from discussions about antique glass and china to theology and politics.

At one point reference was made to Donald Trump being a conservative, to which I responded that Trump is not a conservative.

I said that I neither view nor do I believe Trump views himself as a conservative. I stated it was my opinion that Trump is a pragmatist. He sees a problem and understands it must be fixed. He doesn't see the problem as liberal or conservative; he sees it only as a problem. That is a quality that should be admired and applauded, not condemned. But I get ahead of myself.

Viewing problems from a liberal perspective has resulted in the creation of more problems, more entitlement programs, more victims, more government, more political correctness, and more attacks on the working class in all economic strata.

Viewing things according to the so-called Republican conservative perspective has brought continued spending, globalism to the detriment of American interests and well being, denial of what the real problems are, weak, ineffective, milquetoast, leadership that amounts to Barney Fife Deputy Sheriff, appeasement oriented and afraid of its own shadow. In brief, it has brought liberal ideology with a pachyderm as a mascot juxtaposed to the ass of the Democrat Party.

Immigration isn't a Republican problem – it isn't a liberal problem – it is a problem that threatens the very fabric and infrastructure of America. It demands a pragmatic approach not an approach that is intended to appease one group or another.

The impending collapse of the economy isn't a liberal or conservative problem, it is an American problem. That said, until it is viewed as a problem that demands a common sense approach to resolution, it will never be fixed because the Democrats and Republicans know only one way to fix things and the longevity of their impracticality has proven to have no lasting effect.

A Successful businessmen like Donald Trump find ways to make things work, they do not promise to accommodate.

Trump uniquely understands that China’s manipulation of currency is not a Republican problem or a Democrat problem. It is a problem that threatens our financial stability and he understands the proper balance needed to fix it. Here again successful businessmen like Trump who have weathered the changing tides of economic reality understand what is necessary to make business work and they, unlike both sides of the political aisle, know that if something doesn't work, you don't continue trying to make it work hoping that at some point it will.

As a pragmatist Donald Trump hasn't made wild pie-in-the-sky promises of a cell phone in every pocket, free college tuition, and a $15 hour minimum wage for working the drive-through a Carl’s Hamburgers. I argue that America needs pragmatists because pragmatists see a problem and find ways to fix them. They do not see a problem and compound it by creating more problems.

You may not like Donald Trump, but I suspect that the reason people do not like him is because: (1) he is antithetical to the “good old boy” method of brokering backroom deals that fatten the coffers of politicians; (2) they are unaccustomed to hearing a candidate speak who is unencumbered by the financial shackles of those who own them vis-a-vis donations; (3) he is someone who is free of idiomatic political ideology; and (4) he is someone who understands that it takes more than hollow promises and political correctness to make America great again.

Listening to Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders talk about fixing America is like listening to two lunatics trying to “out crazy” one another. Jeb Bush, John Kasik [sic] and Marco Rubio are owned lock, stock, and barrel by the bankers, corporations, and big dollar donors funding their campaigns. Bush can deny it but common sense tells anyone willing to face facts is that people don't give tens of millions without expecting something in return.

We have had Democrats and Republican ideologues and what has it brought us? Are we better off today or worse off? Has it happened overnight or has it been a steady decline brought on by both parties?

I submit that a pragmatist might be just what America needs right now.

And as I said earlier, a pragmatist sees a problem and understands that the solution to fix same is not about a party, but a willingness and boldness to get it done.

People are quick to confuse and despise confidence as arrogance, but that is common amongst those who have never accomplished anything in their lives (or politicians who never really solve a problem, because its better to still have an "issue(s) to be solved" so re-elect me to solve it, which never happens) and those who have always played it safe (again, all politicians) not willing to risk failure, to try and achieve success.

Donald Trump has his total financial empire at risk in running for president - that says it all. Success for the US!


All Comments

  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 9 years, 1 month ago in reply to this comment.
    How are you going to have a split party when the only party in the race is not split. Government
    Party is everything from extremist secular progressives to Republicans in name only.

    "Government Over People "

    It should be Citizens Over Government.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Dobrien 9 years, 1 month ago in reply to this comment.
    Thank you ewv that was very well written.

    It is a downward slope the US rides with the philosophy of progressivism that is permeating and has been fooling the masses. Telling them that they are not responsible---they deserve
    ----that A=A is not relevant
    ----that it's better to label then discuss.
    Endorsing the collectivist altruism that steals our liberty . It gives a pass on principles and allows for riots to occur when felons are being apprehended for serious crimes and are shot for their continued threatening behavior.
    Principals promoting rugged individualism have been the adversary of the large nonprofit's like the Carnegie foundation, the Guggenheim , standard oil , Ford Foundation. All included in the minutes of the board meetings dating back to 1908. Their stated strategy has three basic prongs
    1. control the diplomatic corp
    2. Control education
    3.Control the media

    Unfortunately the plan is working.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 9 years, 1 month ago
    Prragmatism at it's best. The story starts with a herd of cows.

    Sanders - Cows Fart and kill the ozone layer but if we turn them all in to hamburger they can be re-distributed equally at no charge and the income earned used to buy powdered milk for everyone.

    Hillary - All cows and dairy farmers into a collective with no profit allowed and norms set to provide each citizen with one glass of milk per day paid for by the equal distribution laws.

    Trump. The best dairy farmers get control over their neighbors herds. who will be come employees tied to their herds by executive order

    Students for a Safe Spot America. Cows should not exist as they kill the environment but one glass of milk per day provided to all students daily at no charge.

    RINOS - whatever you say Debbie.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by ewv 9 years, 1 month ago in reply to this comment.
    Progressive Education was a result of Dewey's Pragmatism. Both are described in the chapter "Kant versus America" in Ominous Parallels. Progressive Education is also analyzed in Ayn Rand's "The Comprachicos" in the anthology Return of the Primitive: The Anti-Industrial Revolution.

    The best general search engine for used books at low prices is http://www.bookfinder.com/ It has broader coverage than amazon and usually includes the amazon offerings. Frequently you will find new or essentially new books at significantly lower prices, too.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by ewv 9 years, 1 month ago in reply to this comment.
    Must have sounded like that in the bottom of the trash barrel. Frightening.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ allosaur 9 years, 1 month ago in reply to this comment.
    If you'll follow the conversation, ewv is helping me get up to speed on that.
    Appears I have a blind side in ignorance that requires corrective lenses.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 9 years, 1 month ago in reply to this comment.
    Instead they destroy any third parties that gets in the way of their left wing socialist fascist agenda
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by ewv 9 years, 1 month ago in reply to this comment.
    The GOP did not support a third party at all, let alone the Libertarian Party. The Republicans supported Gerald Ford in 1976, who won the primary against Reagan but then lost the election. The Republicans then won the election with Reagan the next time in 1980. Reagan overwhelmingly won the primary against George Bush I, who was the establishment candidate. John Anderson, the distant third in the primary who ran in the general election as an Independent, was no libertarian. David Clark was the Libertarian candidate. The Republican Party did not support Independent Anderson, who got less than 7% of the popular vote and no electoral votes in the general election, and never supported the politically irrelevant minority Libertarian Party, which in 1980 received 1% of the popular vote and no electoral votes.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 9 years, 1 month ago in reply to this comment.
    I don't care about the left wing fascist GOP or any of that left wing fascist shit. My oath of office and personal oath is to the Constitution of the USA and anything else is meaningless to me. Those that feel differently can take their place as traitors or prove...prove...prove their case. For me they are at present just red tie targets of opportunity
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by zzdragon 9 years, 1 month ago in reply to this comment.
    I agree with you about where the GOP stands now. But I would like to see you and everyone else on the thread below me here list just who you think is electable and where do they stand. Name names please don't just say alternatives.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ allosaur 9 years, 1 month ago in reply to this comment.
    A whitewash? Interesting.
    Anyway, the Ekrich book and the Peikoff book will be in my mail.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 9 years, 1 month ago
    Come to think of it the use of Pragmatic in relationship to a Presidential hopeful is not the best way of presenting the individual. In FACT it's a slam as to their suitability to any objectivist.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ jbrenner 9 years, 1 month ago in reply to this comment.
    Yes, it does mean murdered by the looters and suicide by the moochers who voted for those looters. The lack of understanding of an alternative makes those who didn't vote for Romney or Zero into Eddie Willers-like characters.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ sjatkins 9 years, 1 month ago
    We need a pragmatist that has advocated among other gems:
    1) torture;
    2) large tariffs on foreign goods;
    3) severe punishment of US companies that do any offshore manufacturing;
    4) building a literal wall around parts of the US
    ??
    This is "pragmatic"? WTF?
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo