Pragmatist Trump

Posted by $ TomB666 9 years, 1 month ago to Politics
154 comments | Share | Best of... | Flag

This article gives a little different take to Donald Trump.

Mychal S. Massie is an ordained minister who spent 13 years in full-time Christian Ministry. Today he serves as founder and Chairman of the Racial Policy Center (RPC), a think tank he officially founded in September 2015.

RPC advocates for a colorblind society. He was founder and president of the non-profit “In His Name Ministries”. He is the former National Chairman of the conservative black think tank, Project 21-The National Leadership Network of Black Conservatives and a former member of its parent think tank, the National Center for Public Policy Research.

Trump is not a liberal or conservative, he’s a Pragmatist.

We recently enjoyed a belated holiday dinner with friends at the home of other friends. The dinner conversation was jocund, ranging from discussions about antique glass and china to theology and politics.

At one point reference was made to Donald Trump being a conservative, to which I responded that Trump is not a conservative.

I said that I neither view nor do I believe Trump views himself as a conservative. I stated it was my opinion that Trump is a pragmatist. He sees a problem and understands it must be fixed. He doesn't see the problem as liberal or conservative; he sees it only as a problem. That is a quality that should be admired and applauded, not condemned. But I get ahead of myself.

Viewing problems from a liberal perspective has resulted in the creation of more problems, more entitlement programs, more victims, more government, more political correctness, and more attacks on the working class in all economic strata.

Viewing things according to the so-called Republican conservative perspective has brought continued spending, globalism to the detriment of American interests and well being, denial of what the real problems are, weak, ineffective, milquetoast, leadership that amounts to Barney Fife Deputy Sheriff, appeasement oriented and afraid of its own shadow. In brief, it has brought liberal ideology with a pachyderm as a mascot juxtaposed to the ass of the Democrat Party.

Immigration isn't a Republican problem – it isn't a liberal problem – it is a problem that threatens the very fabric and infrastructure of America. It demands a pragmatic approach not an approach that is intended to appease one group or another.

The impending collapse of the economy isn't a liberal or conservative problem, it is an American problem. That said, until it is viewed as a problem that demands a common sense approach to resolution, it will never be fixed because the Democrats and Republicans know only one way to fix things and the longevity of their impracticality has proven to have no lasting effect.

A Successful businessmen like Donald Trump find ways to make things work, they do not promise to accommodate.

Trump uniquely understands that China’s manipulation of currency is not a Republican problem or a Democrat problem. It is a problem that threatens our financial stability and he understands the proper balance needed to fix it. Here again successful businessmen like Trump who have weathered the changing tides of economic reality understand what is necessary to make business work and they, unlike both sides of the political aisle, know that if something doesn't work, you don't continue trying to make it work hoping that at some point it will.

As a pragmatist Donald Trump hasn't made wild pie-in-the-sky promises of a cell phone in every pocket, free college tuition, and a $15 hour minimum wage for working the drive-through a Carl’s Hamburgers. I argue that America needs pragmatists because pragmatists see a problem and find ways to fix them. They do not see a problem and compound it by creating more problems.

You may not like Donald Trump, but I suspect that the reason people do not like him is because: (1) he is antithetical to the “good old boy” method of brokering backroom deals that fatten the coffers of politicians; (2) they are unaccustomed to hearing a candidate speak who is unencumbered by the financial shackles of those who own them vis-a-vis donations; (3) he is someone who is free of idiomatic political ideology; and (4) he is someone who understands that it takes more than hollow promises and political correctness to make America great again.

Listening to Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders talk about fixing America is like listening to two lunatics trying to “out crazy” one another. Jeb Bush, John Kasik [sic] and Marco Rubio are owned lock, stock, and barrel by the bankers, corporations, and big dollar donors funding their campaigns. Bush can deny it but common sense tells anyone willing to face facts is that people don't give tens of millions without expecting something in return.

We have had Democrats and Republican ideologues and what has it brought us? Are we better off today or worse off? Has it happened overnight or has it been a steady decline brought on by both parties?

I submit that a pragmatist might be just what America needs right now.

And as I said earlier, a pragmatist sees a problem and understands that the solution to fix same is not about a party, but a willingness and boldness to get it done.

People are quick to confuse and despise confidence as arrogance, but that is common amongst those who have never accomplished anything in their lives (or politicians who never really solve a problem, because its better to still have an "issue(s) to be solved" so re-elect me to solve it, which never happens) and those who have always played it safe (again, all politicians) not willing to risk failure, to try and achieve success.

Donald Trump has his total financial empire at risk in running for president - that says it all. Success for the US!


All Comments


Previous comments...   You are currently on page 4.
  • Posted by ewv 9 years, 1 month ago in reply to this comment.
    Refusing to vote does say yes. The authoritarian will win and have power over you because enough people did not vote against it. When there is a difference between the candidates, vote to at least make the difference in the outcome.

    Splits in government do not mean nothing gets done. The government continues to operate under existing laws interpreted by whoever is the president, and agencies continue to make new rules under existing law granting ambiguous powers to the executive branch -- with more rules added in accordance with the political appointees of the president and the entrenched bureaucracy.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by ewv 9 years, 1 month ago in reply to this comment.
    Trump wants the women punished because he wants abortions to be banned. Abortions are legal. He wants to change the law to make abortions illegal. There is nothing to enforce against them and no law to "remove" for what he wants.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by ewv 9 years, 1 month ago in reply to this comment.
    Trump wants abortion to be illegal. There is no "qualifier". He said he wants women to be punished for their abortions, which he opposes and wants banned.

    And why wouldn't he want to punish them? If he thinks abortion violates a "right to life", then in his screwy mind it is murder and women should therefore be imprisoned for life or executed.

    His campaign backed off with a claim that his position is that the doctor is the murderer, ignoring and despite what Trump had just emphatically said -- which is typical of his Pragmatist campaign of shifting positions appealing to whomever he is trying to 'deal' at the time.

    Cruz responded with a crude evasion: "Of course we shouldn’t be talking about punishing women; we should affirm their dignity and the incredible gift they have to bring life into the world,”

    So are all murderers and their accessories now to be exempt from punishment: "we should affirm their dignity"?

    Are the doctor's to be executed instead of the women, or also have their "dignity affirmed"?

    The circus continues.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by ewv 9 years, 1 month ago in reply to this comment.
    "How a problem is solved" includes what is claimed to be a solution at all. More statism to "solve" government created problems is not a solution.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 9 years, 1 month ago in reply to this comment.
    You could but you didn't and you won't. So to keep me in my place I double dog dare you. Or are you afraid what you say you could do will get ripped to shreds on close examination.

    Don't bark like a big dog when all you have is a putting iron.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by ewv 9 years, 1 month ago in reply to this comment.
    Trump is not like Reagan and the GOP did not back a third party against him.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by ewv 9 years, 1 month ago in reply to this comment.
    He is a Pragmatist. Like the rest of them he has nothing practical to offer.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 9 years, 1 month ago in reply to this comment.
    And it's the duty of Congress to ensure he does so....where's the iimpeachment speeches. Why it's disappeared since the congress is just as liable. On only has to look at the situation in south central Arizona to see obeyme and his cabinet and the congressionals are a bunch of chicken doo doo gutless wonders And then one wonders how much was the payoff.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 9 years, 1 month ago in reply to this comment.
    That's your opinion If they were bad and removed such as in Oregon and similar states there would have been a lot of people let out of the prisons. That particular reason turned out to be a specious excuse for legalizing drugs. It should have been followed up on since the amount is extraordinarily high and wasteful of space for real criminals who do threaten society daily. But like the anti draft movement as soon as they got there wish list whatever that was they disappeared. probably both to smoking dope and supporting Pellosillyni.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 9 years, 1 month ago in reply to this comment.
    You missed a few alternatives and alternative choices Trumpet Boy is far from the only choice unless you limit your choices to left wingers only. Furthermore the Republicans aren't the party of Reagan anymore they are the right wing OF the left. Not for nothing are they called neo-cons and RINOSs. But if that's the kind you support then it's one more vote for the Comrades.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 9 years, 1 month ago in reply to this comment.
    I presume you are talking Cruz or the other outside the pale candidate since you couldn't possibly be talking anyone else with that description.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 9 years, 1 month ago in reply to this comment.
    A practical pragmatist all camouflage for yet another left wing socialist corporatist/statist. I've yet to see any thing good stated about or quoted from him. Just a bunch of meaningless doo hicky rah rah. No substance.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by JohnConnor352 9 years, 1 month ago in reply to this comment.
    Haha. Sorry it's from 1984. Newspeak is replacing English in the book. They are taking high emotion words, like bad, and replacing them with more neutral words, like "ungood." Very was replaced with "plus," and all other forms of bad, like awful, terrible, horrendous, etc were replaced with varying levels of "ungood." The worst was "double plus" ungood.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by DavidRawe 9 years, 1 month ago
    Trump knows problems and if there are none creates them. However its easy to say what the problem is and never really present how to solve them.

    If he sees he is not getting what HE wants he stammers and pouts and yells and insults. Wow that works. He is a master marketer and knows how to manipulate the emotions of the "mob". He is not a pragmatist by any means.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 9 years, 1 month ago in reply to this comment.
    Freaking nailed it. The Joke is exposed and the Joker becomes the trump card of the deck. What game? Look in Hoyle ...Stupid As Plays Stupid or Saps!.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Herb7734 9 years, 1 month ago in reply to this comment.
    I have tried to apply Einstein's thought experiment process to the mystery of Donald Trump. Here's what I came up with.I think that Trump, on a lark, decided he'd announce for the presidency. It would give him some publicity and some prestige and after he gets beaten in a couple of primaries, he could complain how unfair it was and then withdraw. Much to his amazement, and everyone else's he started winning. He'd tapped into white male American angst. (Yes he has some Blacks, Hispanics, and Asians so don't go all tangent on me). With the growth of his new found popular support, he was forced to get serious, although totally unprepared. It became a variation of the Prince and the Pauper in reverse, or maybe the Prisoner of Zenda. In other words, the guy who looks the part but doesn't know crap about it suddenly becomes the pretender to the throne. Are people just now beginning to see through the dog and pony show, or will the phony prince become the real king?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 9 years, 1 month ago in reply to this comment.
    There is no profit motive with income tax so first get rid of it and replace that fascist loser with an end user consumption tax. With income tax in place all else is just pandering and enabling.
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo