Obama, Michigan in talks to free up $100M to aid Detroit pension deal

Posted by $ Your_Name_Goes_Here 10 years, 1 month ago to Government
17 comments | Share | Flag

I'm sorry, but I don't recall the Constitution provide these powers to our Dear Leader, The One, Barack Hussein Obama (mmm, mmm, mmm)...


All Comments

  • Posted by cjmcd 10 years ago
    There is a difference between achieving and taking from achievers.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by johnpe1 10 years ago in reply to this comment.
    and while "greed", in this forum, is good, this greed was shortsighted and unwise -- trying to steal from the government till without increasing productivity! that's my opinion; feel free to make it yours!
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by johnpe1 10 years ago in reply to this comment.
    this is why our 2014 dollars are worth the equivalent of 1914 nickels (at least not wooden ones!). the quantitative easing tax is invisible to almost everyone. those of us on nearly fixed incomes are more likely to see this and vote against it!
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Herb7734 10 years ago
    As a former Detroiter, (thank the gods for "former") I can predict that $100 million, $500 million or ten times that amount won't clean up 10 square blocks of Detroit, but several people will be a lot wealthier in a few years.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by wiggys 10 years ago
    what's the big deal. all ob will do is free up the non-existent money. in my view the fed gov is a total disaster that will never get fixed anymore that the aca is going to be fixed. they in dc are a very bad joke!
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by ObjectiveAnalyst 10 years, 1 month ago
    During the years that precipitated the bankruptcy of Detroit the workers were required to be residents and therefore had opportunity to vote for the idiots that created the bankruptcy. The workers themselves let their unions make demands that were clearly unsustainable... I don't think we should feel sorry for them or bail them out. The governor is on this bandwagon too, but if the POTUS does this it will set a precedent and start an avalanche.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Abaco 10 years, 1 month ago
    If this method gets legs and becomes the new paradigm for dealing with such problems it has two possible outcomes, in my opinion. 1 - total economic collapse. And..2 - massive inflation (followed by related economic collapse).
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by SRS66East 10 years, 1 month ago in reply to this comment.
    I agree, there is no way we can bailout the States and Municipalities when the Federal Government is in no better shape. We cannot bailout one city and not another, that isn't a fair application of resources. If we bailout everyone we will break ourselves in the process, Lincoln's observation stands as true today as it was when he said it "Too many piglets, not enough tits".
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo