Woken Up to the Terrorist Attacks

Posted by $ Abaco 10 years, 2 months ago to Culture
38 comments | Share | Best of... | Flag

As I opened my eyes this morning my wife reported that there was another terrorist attack in Brussels. So, the first words I uttered to start my day were, "They need to allow citizens to arm themselves there. Let them all pack heat so that when the terrorists show up everybody can blast the s*&t out of them. That'd stop it. Liberals are into the whole cuckold thing. They hate life."

How's that for speaking before the brain turns on?


Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Comment hidden by post owner or admin, or due to low comment or member score. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 10 years, 2 months ago
    Agreed. It's like Swedes getting all bent out of shapes because rapes continue to rise and they see no connection. To quote a movie...Day of the Jackal version Two..

    "You can't protect your women."

    as for Belgium and the rest

    "You can't protect your citizens because the citizens won't allow it."

    Duuuuh UUUhhhhhhh.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ 10 years, 2 months ago
      A good friend of mine from college lives in Sweden. He's been there the past 20 years or so. Dates nothing but extremely beautiful women. I asked him and he seemed pretty tight-lipped about the immigrants abusing women. I have seen footage of the migrants walking up and literally punching blondes in the face. Frankly, I wouldn't allow that in my community. (that's all I'm going to say about that...)
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Comment hidden by post owner or admin, or due to low comment or member score. View Comment
      • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 10 years, 2 months ago
        Just because you said college Emory University has instituted a hunt for whoever chalked sidewalks with Trump 2016 classifying it as hate speech. That says it all about the left - home of hate speech. Not a Clue....

        and nothing about First Amendment....

        but then they think Free Speech must be paid for if you can afford it.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by lostinamerica 10 years, 2 months ago
          The next time I go to Atlanta, I may go write Trump in chalk on a sidewalk. I guess water does not wash chalk anymore. If that offends you, the issue lies within you.

          I may write Clinton or Bernie too somewhere and see if it gets any hate.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
          • Posted by plusaf 10 years, 2 months ago
            But don't write it in any college students' Safe Space or they'll track you down and beat the shit out of you...
            It's the New American College Way.
            :(
            Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by wiggys 10 years, 2 months ago
    REGARDING THE BELGIUM TERRORIST ATTACK

    There are 22 known Muslim training sites (guerrilla warfare) in America which are not being talked about openly one or more of which might be in your backyard. Federal law enforcement has been given a stand down order regarding these training sites - the same type of stand down order given to border control agents.

    In addition, tens of thousands of additional non-vetted Muslims are flowing into America. They refuse to assimilate with American Culture as they would rather change the culture.

    At the same time the president is in a hurry to disarm Americans by gutting the 2nd amendment.

    Check out the following link for Muslim organizations and mosques in your geographic area which may very likely be plotting a Belgium style incident that could impact you or family members.

    There is something very wrong with this picture and many think the punch line might be right around the corner.

    http://www.clarionproject.org/islamis...


    Diane Anderson
    Global Survival Institute
    www.survivaltrainingohio.com



    INTERESTING READ.
    My basic opinion is that the socalled world leaders must be paid off as not a one recognizes that the radicall muslim world which in my opinion is every one of them is never going to stop doing exactly what they want. Has one muslim stepped to the podium and said you are making the world worse for us? Has one said let us start to end their reign of terror? When each of these attacks takes place we in the usa lose a little bit more of our freedoms, and we have little left to lose. We don't have generals who will work in our favor today as well. as the big 0 said big deal just don't let them change haw you live your life. he is more than just an idiot as are his counterparts in europe. If you think that your children have any chance of a good productive life you are delusional.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by wiggys 10 years, 2 months ago
      Go to the druger report and read that the belgium intelligence knew about the bombing plot and did nothing. I keep thinking these leaders(?) are on the muslim payroll.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by Technocracy 10 years, 2 months ago
    It was two attacks. One at the airport, one at a metro train station.

    It was reported after the Paris terrorist was arrested a few days ago that he had stated he was there to plan attacks.

    Makes me wonder if the reporting of this led his fellow terrorists to execute the attacks before all the details were extracted. It seems to close in time to be a likely coincidence.

    Which leads to the corollary of...had the media not reported the captive talking about future attacks, would they have occurred before law enforcement found out who they were?
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by ewv 10 years, 2 months ago
      Everyone knows there will be future attacks. They are already planned and being planned. Are we supposed to not say that and not arrest them out of fear that it will 'cause' them?
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by Technocracy 10 years, 2 months ago
        Not at all. I was simply wondering if the reporting had been delayed say 48 hours, whether law enforcement would have picked them up before they attacked or sat on their hands like PC dictates.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by ewv 10 years, 2 months ago
          In this case it was probably more incompetence than PC. They already had these clowns fingered. They knew who and what they were, with a long list of evidence, but did nothing.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by ewv 10 years, 2 months ago
    After the string of seemingly weekly reports of mass shootings at defenseless school targets, my first reaction when hearing mention of an attack at "Paris" was "what American university is called 'Paris'"?

    But allowing the supposedly guaranteed 2nd amendment right to bear arms is not the same as telling everyone to "pack heat". It would stop some of the attacks but also a lot more with everyone running around ready to take the law into his own hands in a frenzy of "packing heat". After 'brain turns on" think of it in terms of encouraging self protection with carefully thought out responsible use of very limited use of self defense with the right of having a gun.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by term2 10 years, 2 months ago
    One thing they cant take away from Trump is that he has made political incorrectness OK. He has freed us from the shackles. So we should all speak our minds, which I am going to do now.

    I think we all have to consider personal safety our responsibility. We cant blindly trust that a police force is going to proactively protect us. They come in after the fact, and tell us what happened. NICE, but its not really that helpful.

    Carrying guns around would indeed cut out some terrorist activities that use guns. However if they are suicide bombers, shooting them after they have set off the bombs isnt going to help.

    I think that this whole muslim religion is very flawed and encourages killing the "infidels". Its right in their "bible". Personally, I dont want to interact with such people; and I dont want them living around me until they abandon that part of their religion. If they want to be intolerant, be intolerant in their own place, NOT here.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by ewv 10 years, 2 months ago
      Political incorrectness was already accepted. Trump didn't do that. People were waiting for some leader to recognize it. Trump did, but it doesn't make the 'man on the white horse' mentality the kind of political leader we need.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by term2 10 years, 2 months ago
        Yes, people didnt like political correctness already, but were afraid to be politically correct in their actions and words.

        Trump brought the issue to the surface and said that it WAS ok to ignore political correctness.

        I give him credit for that part, and am happy that he brought the issue up as he has.

        You dont have to give Trump credit for anything if you want. There are Trump haters out there, and apparently you are one of them. Thats what I think, even if its politically incorrect on this forum
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by ewv 10 years, 2 months ago
          You can't evade every rejection of Trump as nothing but "Trump haters".
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
          • Posted by term2 10 years, 2 months ago
            Of course not. BUT, all I hear is negatives about Trump, and nothing about the other candidates. I cant believe he is the worst of all the candidates (especially the democratic candidates). It seems to me that electing the least of the evils is better than allowing a REALLY evil one like Hillary in there. Trump is the only one with popular support to beat Hillary. The other repubs cant even beat Trump with the voters, and are only still there because the GOP establishment is ganging up to get rid of him (he must really be a threat to the establishment is all I can say).

            The whole election is getting boring, especially since the country is heading for a disasster with socialism anyway and the only reason to vote is to slow it down somewhat.

            If John Galt were in the race (which he wouldnt want to be anyway given the cronyism built into our government), he would hardly get anywhere in a popular contest.
            Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
            • Posted by ewv 10 years, 2 months ago
              "Of course not" but you keep saying it anyway.

              All of the candidates have been discussed here. It's you who has insisted on ignoring the other candidates in the primary while falsely insisting despite the evidence that Trump is the only one who can beat Hillary.
              Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
              • Posted by term2 10 years, 2 months ago
                I don't ignore the other candidates at all. I liked rand Paul for his relatively consistent ideas. But he got no traction. I was initially impressed by carson until the religiosity took over and his traction disappeared along with his bid for the job. I looked at Cruz but. His religiosity was a bit much for me. They say he can beat Hillary, but if he can't beat trumps vote count, and it's said trump can't beat hillary, then how could Cruz beat Hillary?. Not logical.
                That leaves trump as our chance to beat Hillary.
                Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                • Posted by ewv 10 years, 2 months ago
                  You have repeatedly pushed Trump in the primaries as better than Clinton, without regard to the others in the primary, along with the emotional fervor of bald assertions about 'making the country great' without regard to principle vs Trump's own overtly Pragmatist Deals idea of government power.

                  The evidence that Cruz (or Kasich) can beat Clinton and Trump can't, the opposite of what you keep announcing as if it were fact, is the numerous polls that show them significantly head and Trump significantly behind Clinton so far.

                  Trump's lead in the primaries to this stage are still a minority fraction of Republican voters, based on a minority zealot support in a primary with multiple split votes beginning with 17 candidates. Trump has record breaking negative rankings that have kept him from getting a majority and work against him even more in the general election. The splitting of votes among other Republicans, most of whom are now out, has allowed Trump to be ahead in delegates but not in popularity. That is why Cruz has wanted the others to drop out long ago rather than be spoilers with no chance of winning, and is why he can be ahead in the primaries with the worst chance in the general election.

                  It remains to be seen if Trump can get a majority at a contested convention if he still lacks the delegates he needs going in, which seems likely. If he does, he has a lot of work ahead of him to undo the damage he has done to himself causing such high negatives.
                  Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                  • Posted by conscious1978 10 years, 2 months ago
                    +1

                    One can only hope that pareidolia is not rampant among Trump supporters. However, I'm starting to consider that "The League of Shadows" has slipped something into the water supply. :-)
                    Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                  • Posted by term2 10 years, 2 months ago
                    I have looked at the number of citizens overall who have cast votes for trump vs who have cast votes for other candidates. He comes out on top by a lot over Cruz, rubio, and lasich. His delegate count is also higher. I am not pretending he has more support;. He just has. He is the anti establishment candidate who has correctly identified the Good ol boys in Washington are crony capitalists who don't tell the truth. Cruz IS the establishment

                    The old goo guard wants to stay in power. And hate trump. Romney hates trump out of envy. Hillary is afraid of trump and verbally is encouraging hop to dump him so she can win. From these polls you quote it would appear Hillary would win like 80% of the popular vote. Trump has more actual primary votes than Hillary does or Cruz does, which makes me think these polls you quote aren't reliable
                    Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                    • Posted by ewv 10 years, 2 months ago
                      Trump does not have a majority of the primary votes or delegates. You have just been given an explanation of why he is ahead with a plurality and split votes but is much more unpopular with record high negatives.

                      Romney is not motivated out of personal envy for Trump. The establishment wants the power for themselves and knows a loon when they see one.
                      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                      • Posted by term2 10 years, 2 months ago
                        Yes, its all about the establishment. Trump will bust up the power. Which I want. The delegate system and the rules are designed to keep out an anti-establishment candidate. The GOP is dead to me and should go down. It stands for nothing, and is just as into cronyism as the Democrats, which stand for nothing either. Then there is Hillary, who is not a human but a chameleon in disguise. She makes promises to everyone that we all know she wont keep if elected. She is going to pander to her financial supporters, thats all.

                        Romney IS into envy over the popularity of Trump and the relative lack of popularity of himself.
                        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by edweaver 10 years, 2 months ago
      You actually believe that any single person can give power or free us from some shackles?? That is allot of power to give anyone, especially someone running for political office. But then again maybe you just summed up why the Donald is doing so well. It is almost to the point of worshiping the ground he walks on.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by ewv 10 years, 2 months ago
        Worshipful idolatry is part of the emotional man-on-the-white-horse syndrome substituting for principles and rational evaluation with respect to them. That lack characterizes politics as a whole; Trump is cashing in on it.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by term2 10 years, 2 months ago
        I do think that one person could just NOT enforce certain governmental excesses, or just not spend the money. I dont think congressional approval would be needed for that.

        I do think one person could also choose to enforce certain existing policies more. BUT, that said, I suspect that to significantly speed up enforcement would take more money, and that would require agreement of the congress.

        I have to laugh when they encourage business to create jobs !! Government doesnt create anything, only standing in the WAY of the economy to need more workers. As a business owner, I never WANT to create jobs. I hire people only if they can pay for themselves and make the business money.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by ewv 10 years, 2 months ago
          Governmental "excesses" are built into law which the Executive branch must enforce and act to impose. Who is president makes a difference, but he can't decide on his own to allow the agencies to function.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
          • Posted by term2 10 years, 2 months ago
            The first step in my opinion is to bring what the government does to LIGHT. So much is hidden from us that its hard to deal with it. Hillary is the poster child for hidden deals behind our backs, and I definitely do NOT want her in power. Sanders really wouldnt get anywhere if he were president- he is too far socialist for right now. Maybe in 4 years, the socialists will totally take over, but not right now.
            Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo